Are you saying because private entities retain XRP tokes, they could be used to manipulate prices, or is there some other angle you're comparing?
No. I'm saying that a privately issued asset shouldn't be included in a publicly funded national treasury because the issuers would get a windfall in profits and that while it doesn't come at the expense of the electorate, unlike government investment in infrastructure projects the devs would gain more value than the public.
Edit to add: basically, if it's pre-mined then the government shouldn't buy it. So from that angle I wouldn't object to BCH or XMR for example. It's just good tokenomics.
Are you suggesting a crypto 100% owned by the gov would be a better alternative? I'd have serious doubts any gov could innovate to that level.
Absolutely not. That would be a completely pointless exercise.
Edit to add: And anyway, the XRP thing isn't going to happen, maybe even the whole crypto reserve. And there's talk that the topic is just Ripple publishing a "self-serving" rumour, which is pretty standard for them if it's true. Maybe Charles Hoskinson will be jumping on board as well.
Last edited:
