Silverpv said:
The electronic part just makes things more organized. Government in general doesn't know what to do with all the information. The private companies that make sense of all the data is why this is being driven. This is not a bad thing, in the past, you could lose your identity if there was a fire in one of the state or federal department buildings that housed your original records. It was significantly easier to falsify data and make you disappear back then as well. In every day and age it doesn't really matter. When you have stuff electronically, you can take screen captures and trending information. There are enough 3rd party aggregators that connect to the banks and download data, you could do it yourself as well. You could do the classic printouts what not but going electronic does not mean more control, its the same control with a clear picture of your behavior that ultimately a computer and not a really a human looks at. They would only look at you if you fit a certain criteria. For you to go off the grid would be different. Instead, it would be easier and better to stay within boundries and common behavior patters so you blend in with the general population vs. trying to disappear which will ultimately have a better chance at flagging you. lol. Think of it as camouflage in data. If you have typical patterns, you disappear in the billions of transactions. Remember these computers and algorithms are looking for outliers. People complain the gov't is slow and error prone, paper processing is why that is true.
Of course one can take screenshots and print them etc. If State wipes out a 500 euro banknote then one can use 5 100 euro banknotes. If State puts a heavy tax on cigarettes one can roll tobacco into paper too.
Get the point? They inflict inefficiency burdens / time / cost if you try to circumvent what they wanna push.
And there is nothing private about the company types I listed. Their existence is State sponsored / forced. Even the internet provider, has as 50% shareholder the local government.
You state here that government doesn't know what to do with all the information. If all what you do is recorded on a central place, then you have a single database, allowing the easiest data searching / selection possible.
Camouflage in data? Typical patterns? Their input is your name, their output is all that sits on the remote / central database. Your name gets attached to any move you make. For ex with cash money it isn't. That's why they gradually cap it more and more. Forbidding cash transactions above 10000, 3000, 1000?
How can you not recognize this? They can nearly write your diary in your place, by simply listing all the identity-attached moves you make. Paycard at supermarket. Login at sites. Never noticed how much sites nowadays have trackers? How nearly all pass to Google? Some weeks ago I've read articles in the newspaper about persons (criminals/terrorists), wherein data appeared that Google recorded. Look at the censoring nowadays on internet. Where Google filters search results based on government directions. Where internet providers refuse certain sites access based on government directions. Where internet routing dns records are rerouted to block sites.
Clearly, governments know what to do and are processing those billions records. That's what a central database facilitates: input can be any field. If they want to know who watches Simpsons all they have to do is enter Simpsons for a certain database record or field token, and they get a list of names, on which they can then perform further filtering.
So lol, giving government and other criminals as least data as possible, appears to me as the way to put a brake on the (further) crap they (might) want to inflict you.
Do you trust organisations that dictate you? I don't. If there is one organisation in the world that isn't to be trusted, it's a government. Just look at history. It's infested with government inflicted crap, worlds wars included. Do you think it's different today?
Government, is only slow and error prone in what they do BACK as excuse for their theft. For the theft themselves, they ofcourse DO have the motivation.
Look at their central banks, their biggest theft organizers. I pasted in recently in another topic.
The Federal Reserve.
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/ "Download, graph, and track 390,000 US and international time series from 79 sources. "
The EBankscope is the most comprehensive, global database of banks' financial statements, ratings and intelligence.
Bankscope combines comprehensive financial statements with a wide range of other banking intelligence including ratings, an analysis model, bank structures, news, AML documentation and banking research. Its coverage of banks is unique. Bankscope has information on 32,000 banks and is the definitive tool for bank research and analysis.uropean Central Bank
http://www.eui.eu/Research/Library/ResearchGuides/Economics/Statistics/DataPortal/ECB.aspx
Take a look here:
https://bankscope.bvdinfo.com/version-201689/home.serv?product=scope2006
"Bankscope is the most comprehensive, global database of banks' financial statements, ratings and intelligence.
Bankscope combines comprehensive financial statements with a wide range of other banking intelligence including ratings, an analysis model, bank structures, news, AML documentation and banking research. Its coverage of banks is unique. Bankscope has information on 32,000 banks and is the definitive tool for bank research and analysis."
That's what their toplevel (central banks) do.
Be sure that national banks have similar national data of local banks.
And local banks similar data of their customers.
Replace "bank" with whatever you're (forced) customer of...
So to me, it looks like the opposite of what you say: camouflage is NOT sitting on a pointed to place with a flag above it with your name on it lol. That's where you give them the criteria to find you.
