There are many silver mines in the us that are sitting idle. They will wait until its profitable. It's not a problem.
I had a deja vu moment, and had to look back at previous discussions - we've been here before.
Fantastic. Now we are getting somewhere.
As pointed out in previous discussions, silver ore is prevalent at good concentrations.
So, following your logic above, price rises will cause an increase in production. New mines will open if price makes it feasible, or old mines will reopen.
In this case, a price ceiling will develop as supply soaks up increases in demand. This is feasible because of the relatively small 30% dependancy on primary production - with only 5 major producers, it would only take 1 or 2 new primaries to cover a doubling to 60% demand.
It works both ways.
There are many silver mines in the us that are sitting idle. They will wait until its profitable. It's not a problem.
They are probably at different stages but they are just sitting on it for now. It's not worth digging up.
Yeah, I'm not going to bother going over the same ground.Yes, we have had this same conversation previously and I intend to debunk your theories with the same logic. Ore grades aren't the important factor by itself, it's production output that is important. I am still baffled that you believe we can just open more silver mines and/or ramp up production and that will be the end of the story. Where are these silver deposits? Majority of the largest deposits have already been discovered and are already being mined. Most mines are already at or very close to their ore processing capacity, so where do you propose this new silver comes from, and in what timeframe? It can take over 10 years for a new mine to produce 1oz of silver and once it's up and running that mine still has annual production limits.

Not 10 years, and FIFO.How long does it takes to make them operational again? And where's the workers coming from?
That's exactly the point. If silver price rises, and becomes profitable, then it will be mined to fulfil demand.Yes but why would anyone want to mine silver if gold is more profitable?
That's exactly the point. If silver price rises, and becomes profitable, then it will be mined to fulfil demand.
Yep not worth it at all. They can just hold the mines until whenever, theres no time limits.
There is still alot of prospecting going on and locating minerals and lots of mining land changing hands.
I've even got a guy that wants to help me dig my gold claim. He has the capitol and the machinery to get it done and that's what I need.
It might be a couple years before then but he isn't the first to offer the help. Everyone wants a piece!
Silver deposits usually run much more rich than gold. There might be a couple ounces of gold in a ton but there could be hundreds of ounces of silver in the same ton.
Gold is often a secondary metal in those instances.
Yeah, I'm not going to bother going over the same ground.
All I will add is that I have already shown there is silver everywhere ready to be mined if the price is right.
And that a 10 year lead time is BS - the reserves have already been discovered.
Just in Australia alone, there are way more reserves than operating mines. And this is a world-wide phenomena:
View attachment 32638
There might be a couple ounces of gold in a ton but there could be hundreds of ounces of silver in the same ton.
Believe what you want to believe - makes no difference to me.Your arguments are too easy to poke holes in.
You can take raw data based on today's price in isolation - makes no difference to me.Mining ratio of silver to gold is 9:1 globally. Deposit density and ore grades do not correlate with the mining ratio. It only matters what can be produced and we are far from a 100+:1 mining ratio.