New 2014 Proof Britannia is an absolute beauty

yrh0413 said:
Compare 2015 against 2014... 2015 looks terrible.

I just got both my 1oz and 5oz 2015 proof Brits, didn't bother to take any decent photos or unboxing. They go straight into my safe.



If the 2015 coins you received look terrible as you claim, why are you putting them in your safe...why not return them?





.
 
I personally really like the design. But not enough to pay the premium for the 5/oz, especially given the weakness of the AUD. Also, my 2014 is just sitting in a box, hidden away, so what's the point?
 
jazzy988 wrote:

Received my 5oz silver coin a couple of days ago. I think it is stunning. The finishing is way better than the 2014 coin - no spots.

Yet.


With the 2014 5oz coins, the spots were there when the coin arrived. Didn't have to wait .
 
mmissinglink said:
yrh0413 said:
Compare 2015 against 2014... 2015 looks terrible.

I just got both my 1oz and 5oz 2015 proof Brits, didn't bother to take any decent photos or unboxing. They go straight into my safe.



If the 2015 coins you received look terrible as you claim, why are you putting them in your safe...why not return them?


.

Just filling the gaps for a running series, 1oz and 5oz proof Brit. 2013 was ugly enough, 2015 is a close second.
 
jazzy988 said:
jazzy988 wrote:

Received my 5oz silver coin a couple of days ago. I think it is stunning. The finishing is way better than the 2014 coin - no spots.

Yet.


With the 2014 5oz coins, the spots were there when the coin arrived. Didn't have to wait .

Same thing happened to me. Both 2013 and 2014 5oz proof Brit has milk spots straight out from the mint packaging. 3 returns for 2013, 1 return for 2014.
Surprisingly zero spots for 2015!

And from the finishing looks like it is from the initial production run (nice and sharp edges). My 2014 5oz 1st copy was decent (although with spots), but its replacement has some "wear" on the corners.... clear sign of the die wearing off.
 
SilverPete said:
Looking at the sluggish sales of this year's 2015 Britannia, I think we can say that last year's 2014 is a winner. I think the 2014 design surprised allot of people, and while the 2015 design is also very good, it is not as daring or as much of a departure from expectations as was the 2014 design.

With the Royal Mint having learned that T&A moves product, rumor has it that the 2016 Britannia will feature ample cleavage.. ;)
 
Gatito Bandito said:
SilverPete said:
Looking at the sluggish sales of this year's 2015 Britannia, I think we can say that last year's 2014 is a winner. I think the 2014 design surprised allot of people, and while the 2015 design is also very good, it is not as daring or as much of a departure from expectations as was the 2014 design.

With the Royal Mint having learned that T&A moves product, rumor has it that the 2016 Britannia will feature ample cleavage.. ;)

ultra high relief... comes to mind :lol: :lol:
 
yrh0413 said:
jazzy988 said:
jazzy988 wrote:

Received my 5oz silver coin a couple of days ago. I think it is stunning. The finishing is way better than the 2014 coin - no spots.

Yet.


With the 2014 5oz coins, the spots were there when the coin arrived. Didn't have to wait .

Same thing happened to me. Both 2013 and 2014 5oz proof Brit has milk spots straight out from the mint packaging. 3 returns for 2013, 1 return for 2014.
Surprisingly zero spots for 2015!

And from the finishing looks like it is from the initial production run (nice and sharp edges). My 2014 5oz 1st copy was decent (although with spots), but its replacement has some "wear" on the corners.... clear sign of the die wearing off.



Perhaps, since 2014, due to RM customers who'd purchased the 5 oz Britannia proof and consequently made complaints to their customer service, the mint actually changed their protocol or finishing or QC or all 3. The fact that the design of the 2015 proof was not appealing to me in the least and knowing full well that the RM is capable of producing a far better design, is the reason I will not buy the 2015.




.





.
 
Question for you guys,

What do you guys think of a 2014 5oz proof that's slabbed but no COA? Does the COA matter more than the slab? It's a PF70 btw. I just picked one up, but it didn't come with the COA. It does say its one of the first 750 slabbed by NGC.

Thoughts?
 
Silverpv said:
Question for you guys,

What do you guys think of a 2014 5oz proof that's slabbed but no COA? Does the COA matter more than the slab? It's a PF70 btw. I just picked one up, but it didn't come with the COA. It does say its one of the first 750 slabbed by NGC.

Thoughts?



There are two types of designations for NGC graded 2014 5 oz proof Britannia's:
1) "Numbered First Struck"
2) standard designation

The "Numbered First Struck" designation is the best designation from any of the TPG companies, in my opinion. You can read more about the various NGC designations here: http://www.ngccoin.com/coin-grading/scale-designations/other.aspx


If the slabbed coin you have does not state "Numbered First Struck" then it is a standard designation...which, being that it's 70, is still superb. We don't know how many dies were used to mint these 5 oz coins, but if only 1 set then with great likelihood, the "Numbered First Struck" coins will have a more crisp strike than those minted later in the run. Dies wear down and wear out....especially those used for proof high relief products....the difference may not be readily noticeable to the naked eye but common sense tells us it is there - to what degree depends on the number of die changes or if changed at all.

Being that the slabbed coin you have says that it's one of the first 750, then with near certainty, you have a "Numbered First Struck" PF70 coin...which is the highest possible grade and designation. It's the cream of the crop (creme de la creme!). You may be able to get a replacement COA from NGC...it can't hurt to ask what is their policy on that.


Big congrats on your amazing purchase! The 2014 5 oz proof Britannia is a favorite with quite a few stackers and collectors.



.
 
The COA is from the Royal Mint, not NGC. I'm still thinking I'll have it checked out just to be sure. For the price I paid, I'm really surprised I got a PF70.
 
Silverpv said:
The COA is from the Royal Mint, not NGC. I'm still thinking I'll have it checked out just to be sure. For the price I paid, I'm really surprised I got a PF70.



If it's slabbed, then there's no reason to believe that the RM will create a duplicate numbered COA for you...that just won't happen.

I wouldn't worry that you don't have a COA but if you are concerned you should ask the seller why there's no COA. You can do a cert look-up on NGC's website for further verification. You can contact the RM but I think it will end up being a waste of your time.

It is technically very, very difficult to create a large, high relief, proof fake of such a coin which actually looks convincing and measures and weighs correctly and secured inside an intact fatty slab with appropriate looking NGC labels. The odds that you have a fake is probably very low to zero.

It's far more likely that you just got very, very lucky if you got it for under USD $1,500.


Post pics please.



.
 
;) I asked the seller about it and he kept reiterating it was slabbed and therefor genuine. I'm going to take it to my authorized NGC dealer just to be sure.

I also wonder if there are any known cases of these spotting. I'm so worried about that on such a high dollar piece it sucks. The COA I didn't think was that big a deal, but to some it might be. I took the risk of buying just the coin in the slab. It's my largest premium silver purchase / oz, but at the price I couldn't refuse. I just want to make sure its legit. The 5oz is so beautiful!

I will post pics once I receive it. Thanks for the info.
 
I bought mine late as well and overpaid it. Well at least based on the initial price. I was looking quite some time to get another one. I was offered at least 3 for sale, that had milkspots. I hope mine won't develop them. Pretty lame for such an amazing coin with big premium.
 
Stark said:
I bought mine late as well and overpaid it. Well at least based on the initial price. I was looking quite some time to get another one. I was offered at least 3 for sale, that had milkspots. I hope mine won't develop them. Pretty lame for such an amazing coin with big premium.

You never know with proofs which is disheartening... I'm a little gun-shy for this very reason! I'm hoping the one i purchased doesn't have milkspots and its only the picture blur...
 
Geez, I got the coin and it has milkspots... Quite depressing... What a pity! I ended up talking to the dealer for a return.
 
Always wondered what NGC's policy is when it comes to milkspotting, even when they have graded it perfect.
 
Back
Top