Thanks @markcoinoz .
Interestingly, and this won't be a popular view on this forum, but most of those issues don't feature on my "horizon of concern".
I think the issue of stablecoins (CDCs?) is overblown. I don't think Western governments want to control every facet of our lives nor have the capacity to. The "petro-dollar" is not a binding contract, it's just a solution to the excessive build-up of foreign currency when the value of exports denominated in USD held by a nation exceeds the value of imports denominated in USD. Changes we've witnessed in the sale of oil in exchange for USD reflect operational matters related to credit risk, but it's not going to go away. And the valid concerns around migration levels is an outcome of governments seeking to create growth in the absence of other traditional promoters of growth ie demographic change, technological development and the increase in the availability of credit. And I can't see how BTC can be taken over by governments.
My concerns are, and not in any particular order, the impact of migration on living standards, the re-emergence of megalomaniac leaders around the world, the increasingly polarised political environment in many Western nations, dumb politicians who don't understand how our fiat system operates and the impact of climatic changes on our health and society. None of which BTC can provide any solution to. It's just handy to have, much like a second passport or shares that pay a nice return. or a highly liquid form of gold or RE.
Interestingly, and this won't be a popular view on this forum, but most of those issues don't feature on my "horizon of concern".
I think the issue of stablecoins (CDCs?) is overblown. I don't think Western governments want to control every facet of our lives nor have the capacity to. The "petro-dollar" is not a binding contract, it's just a solution to the excessive build-up of foreign currency when the value of exports denominated in USD held by a nation exceeds the value of imports denominated in USD. Changes we've witnessed in the sale of oil in exchange for USD reflect operational matters related to credit risk, but it's not going to go away. And the valid concerns around migration levels is an outcome of governments seeking to create growth in the absence of other traditional promoters of growth ie demographic change, technological development and the increase in the availability of credit. And I can't see how BTC can be taken over by governments.
My concerns are, and not in any particular order, the impact of migration on living standards, the re-emergence of megalomaniac leaders around the world, the increasingly polarised political environment in many Western nations, dumb politicians who don't understand how our fiat system operates and the impact of climatic changes on our health and society. None of which BTC can provide any solution to. It's just handy to have, much like a second passport or shares that pay a nice return. or a highly liquid form of gold or RE.
Last edited:

