Leyonhjelm - Pensions are charity

systematic said:
bordsilver said:
systematic said:
Thats all we need ... more desk jobs .....
"Desk jobs" invent, design, finance and protect a lot of the really important stuff in life. Nearly anyone can move some dirt around with a shovel. The "desk jobs" work in conjunction with the shovel jobs to enhance the productivity of all to the mutual benefit of all.

like the "GFC" ....
Which also required guys with shovels building far too many houses.
 
Jislizard said:
thatguy said:
Yeah there is the little bit about tax they have paid all their working lives. If they did not get robbed of hundreds of thousands of dollars they may well be able to look after themselves


Agreed!

As he said...

...What Australians have an entitlement to is the assets we own; our houses, our superannuation, our savings. If we give in to the notion that everyone is entitled to government handouts when we are not poor, then our assets will surely suffer the death of a thousand taxes...

Ummm... thats not what he was saying at all! In fact he was saying the exact opposite
 
Hospitaller said:
systematic said:
bordsilver said:
"Desk jobs" invent, design, finance and protect a lot of the really important stuff in life. Nearly anyone can move some dirt around with a shovel. The "desk jobs" work in conjunction with the shovel jobs to enhance the productivity of all to the mutual benefit of all.

like the "GFC" ....

Systemic, there are many underlying factors to the way our economy is setup, where jobs are located and especially in the boom-bust business cycle we are experiencing.

My suggested readings are:

"How an economy grows and why it crashes" by Irwin and Peter Schiff

"economics in one lesson" By henry Hazlitt

"What has government done to our money" Murray Rothbard

This will give you a good foundation and set you up for further readings if you are so interested.
The first one is even a comic book to make it easier ;)
 
bordsilver said:
mmm....shiney! said:
I applaud the ingenuity of companies who can do this.
+1

If anything, what SlipperyPete's article tells me is that Australia should adopt the company tax policies of countries like Ireland, Singapore, Switzerland etc and attract more head offices here.
That was the first thing I thought when I read the article. If they movie it to countries where they pay 5%, why not just lower our rate to 5% and then they won't need to leave, it will give small businesses a huge boost and maybe even get companies from other countries to want to pay their taxes here instead haha.

While we're at it why don't we abolish income taxes as well and increase the gst to 20% to pay for everything. We could pretty much get rid of the ATO :)
 
Leave the family home alone ....Leyonhjelm can eat my hairy beanbag.
Now im not planning on having to rely on the pension but for the ones that do the fact a house they bought 40 years ago for 30k is now worth 1m shouldnt come into the equation.
 
I've worked in retail, wholesale, yard, dayshift, nightshift, floor, desk and classroom. Each has it's place and perks and downsides.
I preferred physical labour as it keeps my mind free to wander, and kept me fit. I'm surprised how draining being a mouse jockey can be some days, but not at all surprised how my gut has expanded being sedentary. It pays better, but if factoring the cost of the education to get there it took 5 years to get even. Had to do it though, too often I would snap at the stupidity of a so called superior, and they'd target me as a threat or troublemaker for exposing their ineptitude and being more capable at their job. Our bodies also don't last forever and I knew that if I was going to have to work for a few more decades it would be prudent to be able to derive income from knowledge and skills once my knees and back began to betray me.

I don't expect a pension nor feel entitled to one. It'd be a rude shock to get to retirement assuming it would be there to find out it isn't. I also don't trust my money in the hands of others, so I setup a SMSF. If it goes pear shaped I only have myself to blame and I'm okay with that, if I end up needing a pension and it's on offer I'll take it, but I'd hope it doesn't come to that.

I don't think I could spend my life complaining about genuinely underprivileged freeloaders and then take a place on the state's tit I didn't need in retirement. I'd feel that I'd become worse that what I had despised.

My dad never retired, he died a struggling small businessman who managed at least to pass on the intangible wealth of knowledge to the next generation. The tax office helped him into his grave, and from that I learnt the importance of awareness of financial matters and forward planning without state reliance. Though this was the only inheritance on offer, it's one no-one can take from me. I'd be content to manage to do the same to those that come next.
 
And yet we have the financial planning industry built around maximizing pension benefits.

Could you imagine the outrage if there was an industry built around people retaining and maximizing unemployment payments. There really is no difference between unemployment and pension benefits.
 
bordsilver said:
Hospitaller said:
systematic said:
like the "GFC" ....

Systemic, there are many underlying factors to the way our economy is setup, where jobs are located and especially in the boom-bust business cycle we are experiencing.

My suggested readings are:

"How an economy grows and why it crashes" by Irwin and Peter Schiff

"economics in one lesson" By henry Hazlitt

"What has government done to our money" Murray Rothbard

This will give you a good foundation and set you up for further readings if you are so interested.
The first one is even a comic book to make it easier ;)

I doubt you understand how an economy works but thanks anyway ....
 
Do a little reading on "corporate sedentarism" and learn what a real problem is and at what social and economic cost ....
 
From what i gather Leyonhjelm doesnt care what people do as long as they arent on the pension as it is mathematically impossible to sustain .... it was known in the 1980s when projections on the ageing population studies were done ....
 
systematic said:
From what i gather Leyonhjelm doesnt care what people do as long as they arent on the pension as it is mathematically impossible to sustain .... it was known in the 1980s when projections on the ageing population studies were done ....
He doesn't care what people do so long as their peaceful projects don't infringe on the rights of others.
 
bordsilver said:
systematic said:
From what i gather Leyonhjelm doesnt care what people do as long as they arent on the pension as it is mathematically impossible to sustain .... it was known in the 1980s when projections on the ageing population studies were done ....
He doesn't care what people do so long as their peaceful projects don't infringe on the rights of others.

Its all about the money ... always follow the money ....
 
systematic said:
bordsilver said:
systematic said:
From what i gather Leyonhjelm doesnt care what people do as long as they arent on the pension as it is mathematically impossible to sustain .... it was known in the 1980s when projections on the ageing population studies were done ....
He doesn't care what people do so long as their peaceful projects don't infringe on the rights of others.

Its all about the money ... always follow the money ....
Especially if they are giving it away at centrelink :lol:
 
renovator said:
systematic said:
bordsilver said:
He doesn't care what people do so long as their peaceful projects don't infringe on the rights of others.

Its all about the money ... always follow the money ....
Especially if they are giving it away at centrelink :lol:


They dont seem too concerned when people get burned by BankWest though ... they are too busy focussing on pensioners ...
 
Bullion Baron said:
renovator said:
Bullion Baron said:
Should they be able to live in their million dollar home, claim the pension and then pass on their million dollar home to their children?
YES !!! Of course otherwise you are discriminating against others.
So the person that has a cheaper house can stay where they are but the other person has to sell & move ? Its all too hard & a can of worms that even the powers can see it would open . There is no middle ground
As I've already said, it's not my position that they should be forced to move. I think anyone who owns a home (regardless of value) should have any welfare benefits received while alive garnished from the estate once they've passed (before the assets are distributed to beneficiaries). I don't think that's unreasonable, do you?
renovator said:
Im shocked at the amount of people who think that paying massive amounts of tax dont deserve a pension ...obviously you havent given them enough ....yet
They didn't save these taxes up so that they can fund your retirement :rolleyes:, they were spent on services, infrastructure and other benefits while you were paying them.

Talk about a sense of entitlement.

Bullion Baron......... unless your situation has changed recently from previous RE threads you have stated that you have not purchased RE and whilst waiting for your RE "Bubble to Burst", you have been somewhat condescending to the many of us here, that are in the game.

Hence with regards to your comments above ...................Talk About A Sense Of Entitlement :D
 
Stacked said:
Bullion Baron said:
renovator said:
YES !!! Of course otherwise you are discriminating against others.
So the person that has a cheaper house can stay where they are but the other person has to sell & move ? Its all too hard & a can of worms that even the powers can see it would open . There is no middle ground
As I've already said, it's not my position that they should be forced to move. I think anyone who owns a home (regardless of value) should have any welfare benefits received while alive garnished from the estate once they've passed (before the assets are distributed to beneficiaries). I don't think that's unreasonable, do you?
renovator said:
Im shocked at the amount of people who think that paying massive amounts of tax dont deserve a pension ...obviously you havent given them enough ....yet
They didn't save these taxes up so that they can fund your retirement :rolleyes:, they were spent on services, infrastructure and other benefits while you were paying them.

Talk about a sense of entitlement.

Bullion Baron......... unless your situation has changed recently from previous RE threads you have stated that you have not purchased RE and whilst waiting for your RE "Bubble to Burst", you have been somewhat condescending to the many of us here, that are in the game.

Hence with regards to your comments above ...................Talk About A Sense Of Entitlement :D
edit he just answered my question
 
Back
Top