yennus said:dccpa said:The coins may be fake walking liberty half dollars. Still the wrong year, but they were minted in the early 1900s and would be as worn. Possibly the reason you don't see the back of these coins is that they don't match the ASE design.
As spoken above, it is a fake ASE.
dccpa said:Still the wrong year, but they were minted in the early 1900s and would be as worn.
There is another silverstacker member that was present with me. I'll leave it up to that person to decide whether to enter into this dispute. Together I'm pretty sure we saw fake ASEs dated the year 2000.
dccpa said:Possibly the reason you don't see the back of these coins is that they don't match the ASE design.
A picture of the reverse is provided:
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/675_counterfeit_silver_eagle_dollar.jpg]http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/thumbs/675_counterfeit_silver_eagle_dollar.jpg[/imgz]
yennus that does not look like the same coin that you showed the front of in the other picture. The previous picture shows the front of a very worn coin. The picture above shows the reverse of an ASE in very good condition. I have never seen a coin with an extremely worn front and a very good reverse.