Wow!bloomst said:Abc waiting room is 1hr minimum. Lol
Gold Stackers (unless you meant the other ABC)bloomst said:Whos downstair?
bordsilver said:Gold Stackers (unless you meant the other ABC)bloomst said:Whos downstair?
iceblue said:AS far as a blacklist go's this is something a few dealers are looking into. FIRSTLY we must establish the LEGALITY of such a list, which IS being done.
iceblue said:If you dont like lead times wait until the stock is in and pay the price on the day.
Midnight Man said:BullON said:I can see how it would make things a lot more complicated though. maybe a reward system for good payers would be better?
I'll chip in with my two cents worth here, if I may?
Goldstackers, just like all the other dealers here work hard to give us all access to trustworthy supplies of PM's in order to build our stack - and from my conversations with some of these dealers, there's very little in the way of financial reward for them - they're keen to get the best possible prices for us, and pass on as good a price as they possibly can.
Honestly, I couldn't support the idea of giving a reward to folks for doing what they're supposed to do (and agree to!) in the first place... that is, place and order, and make a direct deposit (or other accepted payment) in time.
Heck, I make the transfer within 5 minutes of getting the invoice, and I do that intentionally to get the cash to the dealer as quickly as possible to help them who help us.
[Kr]5s14d10 said:iceblue said:If you dont like lead times wait until the stock is in and pay the price on the day.
You are selectively reading, I have zero issue with lead times provided that it is upfront on the item for purchase. Many online dealers will display product is either "In stock, Out of stock, Approx <insert value> days/weeks for delivery."
If there is a lead time on a product it should be displayed on the item's page, even if it says "In Stock, Approx 4 week delivery time" etc. This means buyers can shop around and actually find stores that have the actual product on hand.
IE: What's the point of me paying a premium to BB over say Gold Stackers if both need to order and wait on a 4 week lead time opposed to say purchasing from KJC whom physically have it in stock? When everybody displays "in stock" when it physically isn't means those holding more stock than others are not being rewarded with the business throughput. I would pay a greater premium to those whom have stock on the day happily, the issue right now is the inability to differentiate immediately through their websites.
[Kr]5s14d10 said:iceblue said:If you dont like lead times wait until the stock is in and pay the price on the day.
You are selectively reading, I have zero issue with lead times provided that it is upfront on the item for purchase. Many online dealers will display product is either "In stock, Out of stock, Approx <insert value> days/weeks for delivery."
If there is a lead time on a product it should be displayed on the item's page, even if it says "In Stock, Approx 4 week delivery time" etc. This means buyers can shop around and actually find stores that have the actual product on hand.
IE: What's the point of me paying a premium to BB over say Gold Stackers if both need to order and wait on a 4 week lead time opposed to say purchasing from KJC whom physically have it in stock? When everybody displays "in stock" when it physically isn't means those holding more stock than others are not being rewarded with the business throughput. I would pay a greater premium to those whom have stock on the day happily, the issue right now is the inability to differentiate immediately through their websites.
iceblue said:Ahh yep cool, is called false advertising yes? Advertising IN STOCK when it is not?
I disagree bigad . If its in stock its in stock on the shelf Available is not in stockBig A.D. said:iceblue said:Ahh yep cool, is called false advertising yes? Advertising IN STOCK when it is not?
"In stock" and "In stock and available for immediate delivery" are two different things.
Big A.D. said:iceblue said:Ahh yep cool, is called false advertising yes? Advertising IN STOCK when it is not?
"In stock" and "In stock and available for immediate delivery" are two different things.
renovator said:Im not a computer person but it couldnt be that hard
renovator said:I disagree bigad . If its in stock its in stock on the shelf Available is not in stockBig A.D. said:iceblue said:Ahh yep cool, is called false advertising yes? Advertising IN STOCK when it is not?
"In stock" and "In stock and available for immediate delivery" are two different things.
Big A.D. said:renovator said:I disagree bigad . If its in stock its in stock on the shelf Available is not in stockBig A.D. said:"In stock" and "In stock and available for immediate delivery" are two different things.
I'm going by the accounting standards used in pretty much all of the businesses I've ever worked in.
For example, I have one company that has manufacturing done in Wollongong and a warehouse in Sydney. An item that has just rolled off the line in Wollongong is "in stock" because the item exists, we own it and we're in control of where it is and where it goes. That's just normal accounting practices. Items stored in the warehouse in Sydney are available for immediate delivery but we'll still sell the item in Wollongong, knowing that it's at some stage in the transport pipeline and it will arrive in Sydney as quickly as the logistics people can get it there.
Should we also have an availability category that says "Available for almost immediate delivery because our driver will probably need to stop and have some lunch on the way to your place"?
Aurora et luna said:When it is less than 2 hours from the manufacturing facility to the warehouse I would be happy with that sort of accounting standard![]()