1for1 said:
Hi, what costs are involved in producing.. i dont see any legitimate reason why they would be capped at that quantity stated, as they are a law unto themselves with no government backing id assume as profit maximisers.. they will just keep the free money rolling..
These guys remind me of diamond traders.. drip feed the supply and claim scarity.
I have read about all i can.. to me this is worse than a ponzi as no-one benefits except those that PRODUCE the coin (albeit with ZERO overheads)!
You clearly have not read all about it. There are no "these guys" who issue bitcoins (it is a peer to peer system), there are legitimate hard cash costs to the transaction validation process (which "produces" bitcoins) and the maximum limit of bitcoins that can ever be produced is hard coded into the mathematics.
I don't have any problem with those aspects and think it is a very smart design. The issues I have are:
1. all transactions are visible, so you have to use randomising services to mix up bitcoin addresses
2. you have extra risks trying to secure your bitcoin "files" from loss
3. because the costs of validation are high it seems this is becoming limited to "miners" who have the big dollars to set up the hardware, which means over time you may well end up with a limited number of these validators, who then effectively "own" the system and if enough of them with a majority of processing power agree with each other, they can change the rules (and thus I assume the max number of bitcoins).
4. Is electronic, relying on the internet and electricity, without either you can't spend bitcoins.
The first two points I see as a turnoff for average people. There is a tradeoff between ease of use and security/robustness. Unfortunately average person wants ease of use.