Bitcoin under attack by Crypto Hacker.? 5400 btc stolen?

Maybe the guys in the gold rush would have been early adopters of some sort?
 
Bullion Baron said:
Load of Bullion said:
How do you feel about the "early adopters" in regards to gold and silver. Is it really any different to Bitcoin in regards to early adopters?.
Once Gold/Silver go from a few cents value to $1000 in the space of a few years (or equivalent from current prices) then I'd be wary the early adopters are probably stepping out as millionaires and dumping the metal on suckers too ;)

Gold and but particularly silver is capable of skyrocketing in price.I think we agree.

Some people on this forum brought silver in the 40's!!!!!but look at the chart below for a classic "bubble" formation.

14_silver_bubble_chart.png
 
Bullion Baron said:
Maybe we look at the Silver chart in another 10 years and the correction we are going through now is the 'first sell off' on the way to a larger bubble phase, that is my suspicion, although only time will tell. Regardless Silvers return over 10 years to the peak ($5 to $50) was nothing compared to bitcoins rise in only the last 12 months. The rise in Silver is far from comparable in magnitude to bitcoins price increase.

You still have the early adopters and the "greater fools" though. Thats when the lines form outside the bullion stores with speculators. I remember them.
 
Load of Bullion said:
Bullion Baron said:
Maybe we look at the Silver chart in another 10 years and the correction we are going through now is the 'first sell off' on the way to a larger bubble phase, that is my suspicion, although only time will tell. Regardless Silvers return over 10 years to the peak ($5 to $50) was nothing compared to bitcoins rise in only the last 12 months. The rise in Silver is far from comparable in magnitude to bitcoins price increase.

You still have the early adopters and the "greater fools" though. Thats when the lines form outside the bullion stores with speculators. I remember them.
And.......
 
beeteecee said:
Are you aware we are a planet floating in a sea of precious metals and every other substance, and that space exploration is at an all time high? Personally I wouldn't want to be holding gold in 50 years, let alone 100.

Are you aware there is an infinite amount of electricity, and therefore infinite amount of 0 & 1 that can be used to create infinite amount of digital currencies.

Yes bitcoin his hard to hack and hard to produce. But Gold is a trillion+ times harder to create and the probability of a gold meteor falling here is not even worth calculating.

So you can be guaranteed gold will still hold its value in 100, 1000, or 1 million years. Unless stars start exploding all around us and showers the earth with gold, but if that happens the value of gold will be the least of your worries :D
 
I still don't understand how an educated community like SS can badger about btc not having any worth time and again. By this same notion, Hard work, knowledge, information, pen on paper, idea's and symbols all are worthless and have no value because it's not a PM.
 
leo25 said:
Are you aware there is an infinite amount of electricity, and therefore infinite amount of 0 & 1 that can be used to create infinite amount of digital currencies.

Yes bitcoin his hard to hack and hard to produce. But Gold is a trillion+ times harder to create and the probability of a gold meteor falling here is not even worth calculating.

So you can be guaranteed gold will still hold its value in 100, 1000, or 1 million years. Unless stars start exploding all around us and showers the earth with gold, but if that happens the value of gold will be the least of your worries :D
Certainly I can understand that, but the limiting factor there is going to be hardware. I get what you're implying of course, but as someone all-in on btc, I can tell you that the alt-coins are not a bother and they're actually complimentary & beneficial. Maybe a governmentcoin will come along, I can't deny. The issue is that metalzzz, and now you, empirically stated that their gold will be worth something in 100 years and on. Depends what "something" is.

People put their aluminium in vaults too, how did that work out for them? I hope they didn't tell everyone their aluminium would be worth something in a million years, eh. Regardless how whacky space exploration (not meteors falling to earth) may seem to you, it doesn't make it not exist. I'm not going to push the point because I'm sure it's provocative behaviour on a PM forum, and I'll probably be dead when it comes to that time anyway. But it never hurts to do your research on what the future has in store. :P
 
9832982738572938575 <------------- What's this worth in 100?



[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/2471_mr-t-gold-chains-sparkling.gif]
2471_mr-t-gold-chains-sparkling.gif
[/imgz] <--------- What's this worth in 100?
 
Bullion Baron said:
Load of Bullion said:
How do you feel about the "early adopters" in regards to gold and silver. Is it really any different to Bitcoin in regards to early adopters?.
Once Gold/Silver go from a few cents value to $1000 in the space of a few years (or equivalent from current prices) then I'd be wary the early adopters are probably stepping out as millionaires and dumping the metal on suckers too ;)

Cat among the pigeons time... gold on 14th August 1971 was $35.00/oz. Or, 3500 cents. Nine years later it was worth $850, to be sure, that's shy of your $1000, but it's close.

Things that make you go "Hmmmm..."? ;)
 
metalzzz said:
"Depends what "something" is."

Is something better than nothing?

No.

As production soared, prices plummeted. In the mid-1800s, the first aluminum ingots on the market went for $550 per pound. Fifty years later, not even adjusting for inflation, it cost 25 cents for the same amount.

Getting around 50c to $2 for every kilogram of gold you own is not better than nothing, as even fiat doesn't depreciate that quickly. My own gold stack would be worth a fraction of a cent. That would be useless to me, and only serve to remind me that I made a bad choice.
 
Hahahahah $1 per kilo.

Maybe Greenspan is off his tree about the intrinsic value of bitcoin too!
http://m.smh.com.au/business/bitcoi...-fed-chief-alan-greenspan-20131205-2yrs8.html

Former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan said Bitcoin is a bubble after it surged 89-fold in a year and that the virtual money isn't currency.
"It's a bubble," Greenspan, 87, said in a Bloomberg Television interview from Washington. "It has to have intrinsic value. You have to really stretch your imagination to infer what the intrinsic value of Bitcoin is. I haven't been able to do it. Maybe somebody else can."
 
...because 87 year old ex Fed Reserve chairman's are always at the forefront of Tech speculation and investment. :lol:
 
Midnight Man said:
Bullion Baron said:
Load of Bullion said:
How do you feel about the "early adopters" in regards to gold and silver. Is it really any different to Bitcoin in regards to early adopters?.
Once Gold/Silver go from a few cents value to $1000 in the space of a few years (or equivalent from current prices) then I'd be wary the early adopters are probably stepping out as millionaires and dumping the metal on suckers too ;)

Cat among the pigeons time... gold on 14th August 1971 was $35.00/oz. Or, 3500 cents. Nine years later it was worth $850, to be sure, that's shy of your $1000, but it's close.

Things that make you go "Hmmmm..."? ;)


Bitcoin started at 1c - 2c and now it's at $1200
If you want to compare bottoms to tops, bitcoin is light years ahead

Sorry bro
 
beeteecee said:
People put their aluminium in vaults too, how did that work out for them? I hope they didn't tell everyone their aluminium would be worth something in a million years, eh.

Your point about Aluminium is pointless as it has no relation to gold. Aluminium is very abundant on the earth, Gold is not. So over time more Aluminium could be mined and thus the value can drop, where as more Gold cannot be easely mined.

Aluminium is the third most abundant element on earth.
44,900,000 tonnes of Aluminium vs 2,700 tonnes of Gold mined in a year. This my friend is the reason why Gold will have value for as long as this earth around. Unlike Aluminium, Tulips or bitcoins.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abundance_of_elements_in_Earth's_crust
 
Aluminium used to be a precious metal. The Washington Monument is capped with an aluminium pyramid - it was almost going to be silver but aluminium was considered more valuable at the time. True story bro.
 
leo25 said:
So over time more Aluminium could be mined and thus the value can drop, where as more Gold cannot be easely mined.
Do you suppose aluminiumbugs thought that more aluminium couldn't be easily mined at the time?
 
Back
Top