ATO & eBay selling bullion, paying tax

dragafem said:
how would ATO figure out from the $10k how much was the profit? and why I mean why include postage too in the $10k? are they really that desperate for the money? I think its already pretty unfair from ebay that they charge the final value fee with postage included.

They're on a fishing expedition.

6641_fishing1.png
 
willrocks said:
You're confusing civil law with criminal law.

But yes, in general I agree that gov numpties are trying to erode foundations of the Australian legal system by reversing the onus of proof. And by having summary judgements, no juries in civil cases ... It's the way things are heading, and it's a slippery slope.

I don't think I drew a distinction between the two but I meant to focus on the various laws that are reversing presumption of innocence in various matters of finance and taxation (and now anything that falls under the umbrella of "terrorism") in relation to the topic of this thread.

Some more info:

New laws targeting criminal spoils could breach basic legal rights

the introduction of the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Unexplained Wealth and Other Measures) Bill 2014, the Law Council of Australia has raised several concerns about the BIll in a submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, including in relation to the:

a. Bill's proposed expansion of the disclosure of information obtained using coercive powers under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (the POC Act) , without appropriate safeguards to protect the information;

b. lower proposed standards for information in affidavits to support the making of preliminary unexplained wealth orders;

c. inequality of arms that would arise between the Commonwealth and the respondent from preventing assets being used to meet legal expenses;

d. lack of demonstrated necessity in expanding already extensive search and seizure powers;

e. need to retain judicial discretion in making unexplained wealth orders, which may significantly impact upon a person's livelihood;

f. proposals to allow consideration of applications ex parte in certain circumstances to infringe a person's right to a fair hearing; and

g. difficulties which arise more broadly for individuals in responding to unexplained wealth proceedings, and the negative implications that may arise for an individual's right to a fair trial in criminal proceedings.

-----

...the reversal of the onus of proof within unexplained wealth regimes, arguing that this runs contrary to established common law principles and to the presumption of innocence.

a. the Commonwealth unexplained wealth regime allows the confiscation of assets without the need for a criminal conviction, and there is no requirement to demonstrate an evidence-based link between the property in question, and the commission of a criminal offence; and

b. the reverse onus means that the respondent may lose legitimately obtained assets if he or she cannot show that they have been lawfully obtained. There is a risk, for example, that liberal use of these powers may result in those who have failed to keep receipts or records losing their lawfully acquired assets; and

c. there is a lack of safeguards in unexplained wealth provisions to ensure that these extraordinary powers are only used when necessary and in pursuit of a legitimate end

http://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/lawcou...nexplained-wealth-legislation-causes-concerns
 
dragafem said:
how would ATO figure out from the $10k how much was the profit? and why I mean why include postage too in the $10k? are they really that desperate for the money? I think its already pretty unfair from ebay that they charge the final value fee with postage included.

The ATO doesn't have to figure it out. They can just guess. You have to prove to them that it's not all profit (or whatever they claim is a taxable amount).
 
It probably goes something like this:

1. Match eBay data with ATO/ABN/Company records.
2. If eBay member does not have a business or company then:
2.1 If gross eBay earnings >= $10K and < $20K then send warning letter (hobbies vs business)
2.2 If gross eBay earnings >= $20K and < $40K then review previous tax returns, bank records. Request an explanation if required
2.3 If gross eBay earnings >= $40K then audit individual
...
 
SilverPete said:
dragafem said:
how would ATO figure out from the $10k how much was the profit? and why I mean why include postage too in the $10k? are they really that desperate for the money? I think its already pretty unfair from ebay that they charge the final value fee with postage included.

The ATO doesn't have to figure it out. They can just guess. You have to prove to them that it's not all profit (or whatever they claim is a taxable amount).

I dont sell that much on ebay so nothing to prove...
 
dragafem said:
SilverPete said:
dragafem said:
how would ATO figure out from the $10k how much was the profit? and why I mean why include postage too in the $10k? are they really that desperate for the money? I think its already pretty unfair from ebay that they charge the final value fee with postage included.

The ATO doesn't have to figure it out. They can just guess. You have to prove to them that it's not all profit (or whatever they claim is a taxable amount).

I dont sell that much on ebay so nothing to prove...
If the ATO send you an assessment notice and you dispute it, you'll need to provide something (accountants can usually help you find something).
 
If you have a accountant and mentioned that you sell on Ebay he or she would have told you that the threshold is $10,000 AU. As once you hit the $10,000 mark you are no longer considered to be a hobby or clearing out some used items. You are now considered to be a online business. I've been selling for many years on Ebay a life time of odds and sods ( non bullion ) and it may take another lifetime to get rid of it, but I've been well aware of this ATO law for many years. I do this outside of my regular work. You need to be wary, if you look in your Ebay summary total sales are listed in US dollars and this can pose a problem for those who are unaware. I would say that being marginally over, you may incur a small slap on the wrist in a form of a warning. If you have a partner or are married set up another account in her name and sell from two different accounts. This means that there are 2 separate Paypal accounts, plus separate bank accounts, plus credit cards so both accounts are totally unique. That way you can stay under the threshold. I feel for you, as a fair percentage is lost in Ebay, Paypal fees plus postage costs. Gee if you sold a caravan or a car on Ebay that could easily put you over the $10,000 threshold in one foul swoop.
 
The $10,000 threshold is just a commonly used yardstick by accountants - it's not legislated anywhere.

From the ATO: https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Starting-your-own-business/Business-or-hobby-/

Characteristics of a business

There is no single rule that determines if you're in business, but below are indicators that you may be.

You've made a decision to start a business and have done something about it, such as registered a business name or got an ABN.
You intend to make a profit or genuinely believe you'll make a profit from the activity, even if you're unlikely to do so in the short term.
You repeat similar types of activities.
The size or scale of your activity is consistent with other businesses in your industry.
Your activity is planned, organised and carried out in a businesslike manner. This may include:
- keeping business records and account books
- having a separate business bank account
- operating from business premises
- having licenses or qualifications
- having a registered business name.

Other tests I've seen applied are whether or not you market your services - e.g. I'm often contacted by people wanting to advertise on Silver Stackers as a "private" or "hobby" dealer, but they're not registered for AUSTRAC as "oh it's just a hobby". Nope. If you're paying for advertising it's not a hobby. The main ones that can affect people selling bullion "as a hobby" are whether you intend to make a profit, and engage in repeatable activities (e.g. steady stream of flipping on eBay). If you buy product with the sole intention of reselling it you're carrying on a business even if you don't want to be. The ATO will probably argue that if you're flipping your rolls of 1oz Goats as singles on eBay you're carrying on a business, as you bought silver with the sole intention to flip it for profit, repeatedly.

While on the subject, if you turned over more than $75,000 in a year and you're found to have been carrying on a business rather than a hobby, you've now also failed to register for GST- the $75k threshold for GST registration is revenue based, regardless of whether or not you're selling input taxed items at 0% GST (e.g. 999 silver bars). I've run into some smaller dealers before who didn't register for GST simply because they thought they didn't have to if they didn't collect any, or as long as they didn't make more than $75,000 of GST sales (alongside of say $500,000 of GST-free sales). Doesn't work that way.
 
I stoped using Ebay many years ago, but if you sell coins or bars many of you sale will be at loss.
It is easy to prove; just try to sell a 1 oz gold bar with profit after fees and postage. You suppose to pay tax on you profit, not on you turnover, so if they consider your activity as business I would try to claim for small losses on my eBay sales if I were you.
 
goldpelican said:
The $10,000 threshold is just a commonly used yardstick by accountants - it's not legislated anywhere.

From the ATO: https://www.ato.gov.au/Business/Starting-your-own-business/Business-or-hobby-/

Characteristics of a business

There is no single rule that determines if you're in business, but below are indicators that you may be.

You've made a decision to start a business and have done something about it, such as registered a business name or got an ABN.
You intend to make a profit or genuinely believe you'll make a profit from the activity, even if you're unlikely to do so in the short term.
You repeat similar types of activities.
The size or scale of your activity is consistent with other businesses in your industry.
Your activity is planned, organised and carried out in a businesslike manner. This may include:
- keeping business records and account books
- having a separate business bank account
- operating from business premises
- having licenses or qualifications
- having a registered business name.

Other tests I've seen applied are whether or not you market your services - e.g. I'm often contacted by people wanting to advertise on Silver Stackers as a "private" or "hobby" dealer, but they're not registered for AUSTRAC as "oh it's just a hobby". Nope. If you're paying for advertising it's not a hobby. The main ones that can affect people selling bullion "as a hobby" are whether you intend to make a profit, and engage in repeatable activities (e.g. steady stream of flipping on eBay). If you buy product with the sole intention of reselling it you're carrying on a business even if you don't want to be. The ATO will probably argue that if you're flipping your rolls of 1oz Goats as singles on eBay you're carrying on a business, as you bought silver with the sole intention to flip it for profit, repeatedly.

While on the subject, if you turned over more than $75,000 in a year and you're found to have been carrying on a business rather than a hobby, you've now also failed to register for GST- the $75k threshold for GST registration is revenue based, regardless of whether or not you're selling input taxed items at 0% GST (e.g. 999 silver bars). I've run into some smaller dealers before who didn't register for GST simply because they thought they didn't have to if they didn't collect any, or as long as they didn't make more than $75,000 of GST sales (alongside of say $500,000 of GST-free sales). Doesn't work that way.

Hi there, you are wrong about your opening statement- " The $10,000 threshold is just a commonly used yardstick by accountants - it's not legislated anywhere." Let's put things into context. Miniroo had breached the $10,000 threshold with Ebay online trading. What has happened, once Miniroo had breached the limit Ebay sent him a generated message requiring him to notify the ATO.

Here is the link from the ATO about " Online selling data matching program protocol "

https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Gen/Data-matching-program-protocol/

There is a lot to read, but in a nutshell all online selling activities can be data matched and online business have to hold data.

Here's a small except from the ATO data matching protacol which mentions the $10,000 threshold applied by ATO's own laws.

Data elements

The ATO endeavours to work collaboratively with data providers to ensure that requests for data are easily understood and reasonable in terms of costs of compliance.

The following data elements, where available, will be requested from the online selling site, in relation to all online sellers with sales of $10,000 or greater in the 2013-14 financial year:

Account name
Account identification
First name
Last name
Business name
Address
Telephone numbers
Date of birth
Email address
Registration date
Number of annual sales transactions
Value of annual sales transactions
Number of monthly sales transactions
Value of monthly sales transactions
Internet Protocol (IP) address
Seller status tier type
Business / Store status indicator yes/no


Even those members on this forum who trade in excess of $10,000 per per annum on Silverstackers just be wary, as this would also be considered as online trading. And the ATO could also data match accounts or data from in relation to transaction activities. Just play by the rules.

In essence, I agree mostly in part with the rest of what you said. Particularly about flipping your rolls of 1oz Goats regularly on Ebay. That in it's self sends up a red flag. As for those just getting rid of Odds and Sods you don't have much to worry about. Most of us have accumulated a lifetime of junk could spend a lifetime to off load it. That's what Ebay and Gumtree are good for. As for Miniroo, just be honest with the ATO about your activities.

Cheers......
 
silversearcher said:
Even those members on this forum who trade in excess of $10,000 per per annum on Silverstackers just be wary, as this would also be considered as online trading. And the ATO could also data match accounts or data from in relation to transaction activities. Just play by the rules.


Cheers......

Bump.
 
I said legislated. A variable annual data matching threshold is not legislation. Last year it was $20,000 that they used as a data matching threshold. So anyone that felt that staying under $20,000 because that's what the ATO use on eBay sales last year would have been caught out this year.
 
silversearcher said:
Hi there, you are wrong about your opening statement- " The $10,000 threshold is just a commonly used yardstick by accountants - it's not legislated anywhere." Let's put things into context. Miniroo had breached the $10,000 threshold with Ebay online trading. What has happened, once Miniroo had breached the limit Ebay sent him a generated message requiring him to notify the ATO.

No. Ebay will automatically send the details to the ATO. The user does not have to contact the ATO.
Ebay have been ordered/asked by the ATO to provide all the details of anyone who earned more than $10k in a year, and they are complying with that request.
 
goldpelican said:
I said legislated. A variable annual data matching threshold is not legislation. Last year it was $20,000 that they used as a data matching threshold. So anyone that felt that staying under $20,000 because that's what the ATO use on eBay sales last year would have been caught out this year.

Yep, spot on.
One could argue though that anyone who was deliberately trying to run a "business" on ebay and stay under that threshold, then they aren't even worth the effort to go after anyway, the tax is pitiful in the scheme of things. Almost by definition $10k-$20k in sales in a year would not be a serious attempt at a business.
Heck you could sell your car on ebay and be over that threshold and potentially be asked for a "please explain" from the ATO. What a pain in the arse and a waste of tax office resources.
I do hope they look for trading history because hassling people. e.g. selling the same new items over and over would be indicative of a business. Selling a bunch of 2nd hand items would not be.
 
goldpelican said:
I said legislated. A variable annual data matching threshold is not legislation. Last year it was $20,000 that they used as a data matching threshold. So anyone that felt that staying under $20,000 because that's what the ATO use on eBay sales last year would have been caught out this year.

Wrong again- Online selling data matching program protocol - 2013-14 financial year 2013 - 2014 is the last financial year and the ATO specifies $10,000 not $20,000. Do people actually carefully read posts. You have a habit of this.

Cheers.
 
I'm guessing they are working off the assumption that as a result of last year's $20k threshold, they're expecting to find a number of people operated multiple accounts that tried to stay under $20k to avoid detection. Hence lowering the threshold to $10k this year.

They're asking for IP addresses and dates of birth - there's some simple data matching points. Also note that they're seeking information on number of transactions - ok, so they can exclude the people who sold a car and an old TV, but breached $10k - but they can identify people who ran say 5 different accounts that they abandoned after $18k in sales each or their first negative feedback, and registered them as personal accounts, and had 100+ sales over the year.
 
Speaking of reading carefully, re-read my post - it's in the context of determining in the eyes of the ATO if you're engaged in a hobby or business, period. A protocol is not legislation.

This has come up on the forum before - previously the ATO has done eBay / tax return data matching on a $20,000 threshold. I may have skipped a year.
 
goldpelican said:
Speaking of reading carefully, re-read my post - it's in the context of determining in the eyes of the ATO if you're engaged in a hobby or business, period. A protocol is not legislation.

This has come up on the forum before - previously the ATO has done eBay / tax return data matching on a $20,000 threshold. I may have skipped a year.

Regardless of the word protocol or legislation the ATO are up front with their threshold. From Miniroo's point of view I'd think he's more concerned about answering to the ATO...I hope all goes well for him.

Cheers
 
Back
Top