New laws targeting criminal spoils could breach basic legal rights
the introduction of the Crimes Legislation Amendment (Unexplained Wealth and Other Measures) Bill 2014, the Law Council of Australia has raised several concerns about the BIll in a submission to the Senate Standing Committee on Legal and Constitutional Affairs, including in relation to the:
a. Bill's proposed
expansion of the disclosure of information obtained using coercive powers under the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 (Cth) (the POC Act) , without appropriate safeguards to protect the information;
b.
lower proposed standards for information in affidavits to support the making of preliminary unexplained wealth orders;
c. inequality of arms that would arise between the Commonwealth and the respondent from
preventing assets being used to meet legal expenses;
d. lack of demonstrated necessity in expanding already extensive search and seizure powers;
e. need to retain judicial discretion in making unexplained wealth orders, which may significantly impact upon a person's livelihood;
f. proposals to allow consideration of applications ex parte in certain circumstances to infringe a person's right to a fair hearing; and
g. difficulties which arise more broadly for individuals in responding to unexplained wealth proceedings, and the negative implications that may arise for an individual's right to a fair trial in criminal proceedings.
-----
...the reversal of the onus of proof within unexplained wealth regimes, arguing that this runs contrary to established common law principles and to the presumption of innocence.
a. the Commonwealth unexplained wealth regime allows the confiscation of assets without the need for a criminal conviction, and there is no requirement to demonstrate an evidence-based link between the property in question, and the commission of a criminal offence; and
b. the reverse onus means that the respondent may lose legitimately obtained assets if he or she cannot show that they have been lawfully obtained. There is a risk, for example, that liberal use of these powers may result in those who have failed to keep receipts or records losing their lawfully acquired assets; and
c. there is a lack of safeguards in unexplained wealth provisions to ensure that these extraordinary powers are only used when necessary and in pursuit of a legitimate end
http://www.lawcouncil.asn.au/lawcou...nexplained-wealth-legislation-causes-concerns