chowdersilver
New Member
100% trust and use SDB.
I think it by far best option for most.
I think it by far best option for most.
dccpa said:Niveka said:Let me ask you a question, if you had a neighbor that you knew pretty well and thought he was a good fellow, would you trust him to keep your stack for you? Probably not. So if your not willing to trust your neighbor to hold your stack, why would you trust a bureaucracy/corporation who looks at you as nothing more than a number to hold onto it for you? In both cases you are likely to lose it when things go badly, however you neighbor will at least feel a little guilty about taking your retirement from you, the bank will just look at you with a blank face and say "sorry sir, those are the rules, we no longer have your stack, please step aside your holding up the line".
Mind you, I'm not saying that keeping it at home is a good idea either. Personally, I tie mine to weather balloons and keep a spreadsheet calculating how long they will stay in the stratosphere and when I should expect them to come back down.
Why would your bank know you have pms in a SDB? I rent a SDB and that is the end of the bank's involvement. In the US, only the renter of the SDB has the second key. A bank would have to drill your SDB to open it. There are only two know instances of SDBs being opened (BAC in San Francisco & the British police (London?)). Both entities paid dearly for what happened. How many SSer members have had their pms stolen from their homes?
Stick with local banks where you know the employees and where they live.![]()
dccpa said:No, it isn't that simple. Such a plan would leak and cause mass public panic and bank runs. There is no way on God's green earth that the US Government could carry out such a plan without first imposing Martial Law.
I scanned the rumor posted on that web site. You really want to plan your investing based on something somebody's relative supposedly said 9 years ago? If what was written was true, don't you think other banks would have been involved? Homeland Insecurity doesn't have enough employees to cover bank branches. And if a SHTF scenario were to occur, they would be very busy with invasion, disaster, whatever.
It's a free world. You guys keep on planning based on scenarios that don't make any sense.
SilverDJ said:Bullion Baron said:What is the nature of the crisis unfolding that sees Australian banks seize the contents of safe deposit boxes for their Gold?
There basically isn't any. It's a prepper fantasy.
sammysilver said:I wonder if a monster safe within a lock up storage facility, with 24 hour security, is an option?
trew said:There are plenty but they are very unlikely - much like cyclones and earthquakes hitting southern AustraliaSilverDJ said:There basically isn't any. It's a prepper fantasy.Bullion Baron said:What is the nature of the crisis unfolding that sees Australian banks seize the contents of safe deposit boxes for their Gold?
Still if the govt suddenly needed gold it would be much easier to just take over all the gold mines and keep their output than chase the holdings of individuals
The govt owns the perth mint - plenty in storage there to confiscate easily as well
Niveka said:dccpa said:No, it isn't that simple. Such a plan would leak and cause mass public panic and bank runs. There is no way on God's green earth that the US Government could carry out such a plan without first imposing Martial Law.
I scanned the rumor posted on that web site. You really want to plan your investing based on something somebody's relative supposedly said 9 years ago? If what was written was true, don't you think other banks would have been involved? Homeland Insecurity doesn't have enough employees to cover bank branches. And if a SHTF scenario were to occur, they would be very busy with invasion, disaster, whatever.
It's a free world. You guys keep on planning based on scenarios that don't make any sense.
I did talk to a representative at my bank and although their response was not black and white I did not like their answer, good enough for me not to trust them with my PM's. Back to my original statement, it amazes me how so many people are so eager to give complete control over to a large organization that doesn't know you, doesn't care about you, and when the chips are down will follow whatever their policy is irregardless of who truly owns the contents of the box. Not for me, I like the control right where it should be, in my hands.
Surely a private vaulting system is not so safe? How many armed guards do they have to protect it? One? How thick is the safe? 1 cm? Surely experienced bank robbers can steal from a private vaulting system much much easier than from a bank safe.tozak said:The 3rd option and what I think is the better option is to store in a private vaulting system. Just think the biggest moves up in the metals is when there is extreme market volatility which will most likely see the banks closed for a bank holiday, would suck having your stash non-accessible when prices are spiking up.
SilverDJ said:- It's a secure facility. Not remotely close to private vault secure, but good enough to keep the casual opportunistic thieves away. (Anyone ever heard a report of any being broken into?, can't say I have).
sammysilver said:Food, water and shelter will be my first concerns, then my stack.
I wonder if a monster safe within a lock up storage facility, with 24 hour security, is an option?
Only to barter for women.The Crow said:sammysilver said:Food, water and shelter will be my first concerns, then my stack.
I wonder if a monster safe within a lock up storage facility, with 24 hour security, is an option?
Sammy, I am shocked at your warped priorities .....
Food & water before your stack!!