sammysilver said:
Photonaware said:
Guess my silver would cost me about half the price paid if bought now. No chance of replacing my car with such negative equity. Where are all the optimistic stackers from last year hiding these days ?
I thought silver stackers stacked silver, not capital gains.
The idea is to get out of fiat, if you are so inured to fiat why stack silver, stack fiat.
I'm an optimistic stacker, and I have never hid.
Stackers' intention is to stack gain nor loss, but to stack purchasing power.
Paying prices bloated by outside inflation-temporary buyers of silver is destinied to loss, since their gain implies loss.
sammysilver said:
Why, when you make a capital loss, would you throw it in the face of others? Why bring others down to justify your own failings?
Reality is that alot of those 'optimistic stackers' actually weren't stackers, at least not then, and most of them also not later, because if all purchasing power gains had been converted to more silver, the price wouldn't have dropped at all, it would be a net neutral supply(sales)/demand(purchases), thus nothing but a shift of silver ownership.
They didn't stack silver then, they stacked other peoples purchasing power.
Money 'made' by frontrunning, misleading then dumping.
They didn't say that they sat ready to sell.
The same period wherein they recommended others to buy, they sold themselves.
It's funny how in the forum threads lists of that period, topics about selling are very scarce to find, and the few that are there, claim to sell for coincidental / unrelated to the price-reasons (need money due to unforeseen event, someone else wants to sell and asks where best place, so on).
But during the following months and even years, gradually the posts pop up scattered around in various threads, where some 'optimistic stackers' of back then, proudly declare that they managed to sell in the high $40's.
Also, those 'optimistic stackers', after the big profitgrab and consequential steep price decline, suddenly become 'pessimistic stackers'. Spreading around pessimism. On the moment that they are 'out'. Ready to do the opposite of what they did in the high $40's.
So I can understand Photonaware very well. All it needs is to have seen it yourself.
I think optimism and pessimism should have no place in any market. If I go to the baker to buy a bag cookies while knowing the price, why should I be optimistic or pessimistic? Those feelings are not relevant in real market, at exchanging stuff. They are only relevant on thievery places, where something gets nothing in return, and prices sweep hefty around in year/month/day and even hour fashions. So don't give those feelings a place. Silver is an asset. Whatever happens to the price, the amount ounces stay. But it requires taking care when buying. By trying to find out who all holds silver, and for which reasons, and the general price increasings rate that gradually (or fast sometimes) removes profit at steadily higher price levels.
See, the idea is not to get out at fiat alone, but also to do that in a lossless operation, meaning that you get an amount ounces silver of whose production/processing/distribution cost is comparable to what you produced today to earn that fiat. Failing that means already starting with a loss, much like a fiatcurrency devaluation round would have done to your bank account. Those that bought silver at $40, and now see $20, well, it's exactly the same as a 50% devaluation operation by the central planning. Succesful hedging against inflation is thus more than just buying 'always optimistic', and Photonaware's post makes exactly that clear.