p.s. I will add one comment which I forgot to mention
That is a straw man argument which you seem to make a lot of. I never said a job is a right. I never said we should have a minimum wage (I merely suggested that voluntarily paying higher wages can get you reliable local employees).
However what is a right as a nation is the right to decide who we let into our country (I bet you wouldn't like it if 20 million Indians and 20 million Chinese turned up next week because we just let everyone in) with my point being there are more productive people we should be letting into our country than the backpackers washing dishes or serving your latte.
I'm done now. Thanks for the debate guys.
In the context of my explanation the comment that a job is not a right was not a strawman. I was hardly misrepresenting you. Labour is just one factor in the means of production and just as with the other factors of production, the best outcomes for consumers are achieved when the factors of production are used with maximum efficiency and to do so, the businessman must have the freedom to employ who best suits his needs ie he must have access to a flexible labour market.
Your concerns have no basis in sound economic policy and your conclusions drawn from them have ramifications that have unintended negative outcomes for consumers eg:
point being there are more productive people we should be letting into our country than the backpackers washing dishes or serving your latte.
So who is going to wash the dishes, serve me my latte or pick pineapples? I'll tell you who - the labour force that the business owner freely chooses to employ that enables him to maximise productivity which in turn enhances the wealth of all.