SilverPete said:Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
I deny changing the climate.
SilverPete said:Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
That only makes you look more guilty!willrocks said:SilverPete said:Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
I deny changing the climate.
SilverPete said:Shippeevt said:Jeez you guys are so serious... I don't know anything about vat... I'm sorry I tried to make a joke... Relax!
Don't worry, some people are completely humor-impaired and couldn't see a joke if it smacked them in the face. Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
Another one: If we were looking at a collapse of manufacturing capacity, maybe convert the proftits from silver into a stock of high quality, hardened, alloy steel tools, especially for essential equipment that would be around for a long time, maybe for things like diesel generators.SilverPete said:sammysilver said:SilverPete said:It will certainly bring some excitement back onto the market.
I wonder if we will see periodic plateaus as people who bought at previous price points before the current slump liquidate their silver holdings?
Would you sell? If silver hits $50 an ounce, the highest price point in our history, what would you do with the proceeds? I'm talking thousands of ounces not hundreds. With both the stock and property markets collapsed and going down, which hard asset becomes attractive outside of precious metals?
Depends on the specific conditions at the time, but even if property prices were declining, I'd go for productive farmland with rich soils and dependable access to fresh water.
As I said, " ... even if it smacked them in the face" :lol:Court Jester said:SilverPete said:Shippeevt said:Jeez you guys are so serious... I don't know anything about vat... I'm sorry I tried to make a joke... Relax!
Don't worry, some people are completely humor-impaired and couldn't see a joke if it smacked them in the face. Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
I am a Labor supporter AND dont believe in man made climate change
so much for your stereotypes
sammysilver said:SilverPete said:DailySilverStacker said:I feel like many people are demoralized by the past few correction years. However once silver starts rising again, the demand will come back with a VENGEANCE!
Once silver trends above $25 I can see investors swooping back in like crazy!
It will certainly bring some excitement back onto the market.
I wonder if we will see periodic plateaus as people who bought at previous price points before the current slump liquidate their silver holdings?
Would you sell? If silver hits $50 an ounce, the highest price point in our history, what would you do with the proceeds? I'm talking thousands of ounces not hundreds. With both the stock and property markets collapsed and going down, which hard asset becomes attractive outside of precious metals?
SilverPete said:As I said, " ... even if it smacked them in the face" :lol:Court Jester said:SilverPete said:Don't worry, some people are completely humor-impaired and couldn't see a joke if it smacked them in the face. Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
I am a Labor supporter AND dont believe in man made climate change
so much for your stereotypes
SilverPete said:The Crow said:Water - invest in water! It is going to be THE commodity of the future.
How? - well, that's a different issue.
I believe the largest water licence in Australia was sold to the Chinese a couple of years ago.
But if we ever get affordable fusion generators or some other cheap source of power, desalination may become economically viable for irrigation.
The good thing is that the patents only last for a number of years. 20 for technology I believe. After that, everybody can copy it.phrenzy said:Cause you know with their background that if they Crack the fusion nut they will have it patented and locked up do tight we'll be using LM fusion reactors for 100 years.
Unfortunately there are a number of strategies for extending the life of patents.Cheepo said:The good thing is that the patents only last for a number of years. 20 for technology I believe. After that, everybody can copy it.phrenzy said:Cause you know with their background that if they Crack the fusion nut they will have it patented and locked up do tight we'll be using LM fusion reactors for 100 years.![]()
Governments can, and regularly do, override patent rights in the national interest.SilverPete said:Unfortunately there are a number of strategies for extending the life of patents.Cheepo said:The good thing is that the patents only last for a number of years. 20 for technology I believe. After that, everybody can copy it.phrenzy said:Cause you know with their background that if they Crack the fusion nut they will have it patented and locked up do tight we'll be using LM fusion reactors for 100 years.![]()
SilverPete said:As I said, " ... even if it smacked them in the face" :lol:Court Jester said:SilverPete said:Don't worry, some people are completely humor-impaired and couldn't see a joke if it smacked them in the face. Usually it goes along with being a climate-change denier and an extreme right-wing Liberal Party supporter.![]()
I am a Labor supporter AND dont believe in man made climate change
so much for your stereotypes
I read about this some time ago, but I think it hasn't really been talked about to the extent it should have, considering the repercussions. Is LM being paid off by BP and Shell to abandon the technology? LM has a market capitalisation of 58 billion, and BP one of 80 billion. If you add Shell, Texaco, etc. and the weight of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, etc. and Canadian Tar sands, etc. and put together all the oil interests LM is little more than chicken pee.phrenzy said:Plus with 20 years of never before seen profits and the attraction of having the first practical reactor they will have basically the whole field to themselvs to continue patenting things in slightly different combinations and all the technology for the best generation reactors. Just like big pharma making small variations on popular drugs to maintain patents after they should have expired.
LM are just the sort of company with ties to every level of government, domestically and internationally, to get exactly what they want and you better believe they will squeese every cent out of their work. Still the benefits are so great even with LM's massive profit making the benefits for everyone will be huge.
I suppose we can all hope EMC2 get there first.
Also I wouldn't be surprised if China starts making knock offs within a year or two.
It will be fascinating to see the effect the announcement and confirmation of practical fusion will have in economies and PMs. I wouldn't want to be holding BP or shell stock when it happens. Eventually the completely amazing availability of energy will allow us to mine gold/silver/rare earths from sea water but that will take a decade or two after fusion is rolled out. I think in the meantime there will be chaos in the market as people figure out the repercussions abd a short term flight to PMs as big companies in energy collapse.
I noticed that the difference between buy and sell is really low, like 1.7% or something (if I remember correctly), while the difference for 1 kg coins is like 15% or something. There 10 oz RCM bars are a great deal!!a1nipper said:Just bought another 10 ounce RCM bar. Hooked on government issued bars!