wrcmad said:
Miloman said:
The whole market is completely rigged and it's the big boys that can make the market anyway they want.
For every short sale, there is someone buying the long side.
Read my sig....
Miloman said:
The paper market doesn't even need to hold a single ounce of metal.
That's because futures are not an equivalent to physical. They represent an agreement only. However, the permabulls will unequivocally push this idea to support their own interests.
The futures market mainly serves as a hedging environment, where people hedge themselves against price changes due to money for nothing clubbers' purchases and dumps.
The hedging takes place along a contract with an amount dollars backing it up, coming from those that take the positions.
The money one gains doesn't come from thin air, it comes from opposite position (long versus short) owners, doesn't really matter which name is sticked on it. If the spot price is moved up, the ones with short positions get dollars subtracted and the ones with long positions get those dollars added.
What IS sure is that by the time of expiration (being a certain month / contract maturation), that the market arbitrators will perform steps (by buying or selling silver) to make the spot price equal to the forward price of that month. They have to, otherwise the very existence reason of the futures market, as a hedging environment, would be lost.
And this makes clear that the entire blaming of the Comex / futures market is actually blaming those that the Comex futures market hedges against: the temporary buyers. Those that buy, dump, buy back in, dump, rinse and repeat.
You ridiculized me for my monitoring of the Comex position, but that total net position reflects the price risk that the futures market / hedgers see. They can be wrong, but usually they are, as a whole, right. That's why the price trend shows a correlation with the Comex position trend.
Of course, in the end, the price depends on the whole of the market. Not just the money for nothing club, the real speculators and the real users. And beyond this: other markets, and the world economy, as a whole.
The difference between fundamental analysis and technical analysis is that the former observes past and present market data, much like producers, while the latter observes peoples buy/sell behaviour, much like thieves.

So the market, IS, in a part rigged, but indeed not by the Comex / paper represented purchases (or agreements, it's irrelevant since both drive the price and that's all what matters). It's rigged by the shorter term / high speed frontrunners, the parasitic drain upon the market we all depend. So if one sees a vertical in the price, no matter up or down, without apparent 'fundamental' reason (read: production, real users), it should be a think twice before following it (read: pay the higher price, or, sell at the lower price). Because doing so, then means paying them a free ride. So if you read here and there that Joe and Freddy sold, became King Cash, Got Out, well, those are who are hedged against.