i am indebted to max - he highlighted many aspects of irreality to society, and put them into a context that makes sense - big banks' collusion with global politics. it makes 'tangible' sense, whereas other conspiratorial angles just prey on emotions. but i don't trust him. someone else doesn't - mk posted this video of someone speculating who is the real maxkeiser ...
http://maxkeiser.com/2011/09/15/is-...i-nakamoto-creator-of-bitcoin-or-keiser-soze/
based on mk's prior experience in showmanship and holywood capitalization experience, and his hyping bitcoin, that video suggests he and stacey are behind bitcoins. indeed, bitcoins seem to be a departure from tangible assets, right?
anyway, i still check in with his site regularly, but find the preaching to the choir and the choir's adulation a bit of a put-off.
http://maxkeiser.com/2011/09/15/is-...i-nakamoto-creator-of-bitcoin-or-keiser-soze/
based on mk's prior experience in showmanship and holywood capitalization experience, and his hyping bitcoin, that video suggests he and stacey are behind bitcoins. indeed, bitcoins seem to be a departure from tangible assets, right?
anyway, i still check in with his site regularly, but find the preaching to the choir and the choir's adulation a bit of a put-off.