What will happen at the next time bad economical news from US side?

SilverPete said:
Pirocco said:
Should I now watch my silver wallet?
Yes, you should check that there is room for more silver.
If the stock markets collapse, there will be plenty of room created in your silver wallet - a void left by a chunk of disappearing value.
 
wrcmad said:
SilverPete said:
Pirocco said:
Should I now watch my silver wallet?
Yes, you should check that there is room for more silver.
If the stock markets collapse, there will be plenty of room created in your silver wallet - a void left by a chunk of disappearing value.
Sound's like a stock market crash would be a good time to stock up on silver before the price bounce.
 
wrcmad said:
If the stock markets collapse, there will be plenty of room created in your silver wallet - a void left by a chunk of disappearing value.
Your 'value' doesn't alter metal.
Just like it doesn't alter paper, cotton, ink, electronic figures, etc. :D
 
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
If the stock markets collapse, there will be plenty of room created in your silver wallet - a void left by a chunk of disappearing value.
Your 'value' doesn't alter metal.
Just like it doesn't alter paper, cotton, ink, electronic figures, etc. :D
Exactly correct, though a little irrelevant. :/
My 'value' doesn't alter metal..... it also doesn't alter the logs my dog deposits on the lawn. :lol:
Value alters purchasing power and wealth, the very foundation of stacking philosophy.
 
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
If the stock markets collapse, there will be plenty of room created in your silver wallet - a void left by a chunk of disappearing value.
Your 'value' doesn't alter metal.
Just like it doesn't alter paper, cotton, ink, electronic figures, etc. :D
Exactly correct, though a little irrelevant. :/
My 'value' doesn't alter metal..... it also doesn't alter the logs my dog deposits on the lawn. :lol:
Value alters purchasing power and wealth, the very foundation of stacking philosophy.

Also irrelevant, but the log deposits will alter the value of your grass. :D
 
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
If the stock markets collapse, there will be plenty of room created in your silver wallet - a void left by a chunk of disappearing value.
Your 'value' doesn't alter metal.
Just like it doesn't alter paper, cotton, ink, electronic figures, etc. :D
Exactly correct, though a little irrelevant. :/
My 'value' doesn't alter metal..... it also doesn't alter the logs my dog deposits on the lawn. :lol:
Value alters purchasing power and wealth, the very foundation of stacking philosophy.
Value does nothing.
It doesn't create voids in a wallet, it doesn't alter metal paper cotton ink electronic figures and it doesn't alter your dog lawn deposits.
All you summed up was, and stays, a little irrelevant. :/
Value is not an economical agent.
Value is a result of what agents do.
The "very foundation of stacking" is having assets instead of promises.
The "very foundation of stacking" is to control instead of to undergo.
Philosophy? Wot? It's just saving instead of spending. If that was philosophy then banks would deal books not money lol.
Whether or not that is in terms of purchasing power and wealth succesful, depends on the prices you targeted, relative to the prices of the products you used it as inbetween step to.
And that applies to anything.
Not just silver. Or gold. Or dollar.
 
Pirocco said:
Value does nothing.
.......
Whether or not that is in terms of purchasing power and wealth succesful, depends on the prices you targeted, relative to the prices of the products you used it as inbetween step to.
And that applies to anything.
Not just silver. Or gold. Or dollar.
Although you can't stand it, I still agree. :D
Agree. Agree. Agree.

You called it 'relative prices'.
I called it 'value'.
Mere semantics.

Like your recent charts too. Good for giving you an insight into forward prices (not front running! :cool: ) Very becoming. Who would have thought? :)
 
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
Value does nothing.
.......
Whether or not that is in terms of purchasing power and wealth succesful, depends on the prices you targeted, relative to the prices of the products you used it as inbetween step to.
And that applies to anything.
Not just silver. Or gold. Or dollar.
Although you can't stand it, I still agree. :D
Agree. Agree. Agree.

You called it 'relative prices'.
I called it 'value'.
Mere semantics.

Like your recent charts too. Good for giving you an insight into forward prices (not front running! :cool: ) Very becoming. Who would have thought? :)
I think this could be the start of a bromance between you & pirocco.
 
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
Value does nothing.
.......
Whether or not that is in terms of purchasing power and wealth succesful, depends on the prices you targeted, relative to the prices of the products you used it as inbetween step to.
And that applies to anything.
Not just silver. Or gold. Or dollar.
Although you can't stand it, I still agree. :D
Agree. Agree. Agree.

You called it 'relative prices'.
I called it 'value'.
Mere semantics.

Like your recent charts too. Good for giving you an insight into forward prices (not front running! :cool: ) Very becoming. Who would have thought? :)
I wasn't striving for your agree or disagree.
I made clear what you failed to make clear.
Your 'void in a wallet' is not a void in assets.
Silver nor dollarpaper/cotton nor dollarink nor dollarelectronic figures disappear when their prices drop relative to other prices.
Your denominator is dollar.
My denominators are all the assets that are ones start and end, and where the monetary asset served as inbetween step to.
 
renovator said:
I think this could be the start of a bromance between you & pirocco.
I can use somebody to manage the food of the chickens.
They have lotsa place and lotsa corners to dig for food, in case wrcmad measures the wrong thing. :)
 
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
Value does nothing.
.......
Whether or not that is in terms of purchasing power and wealth succesful, depends on the prices you targeted, relative to the prices of the products you used it as inbetween step to.
And that applies to anything.
Not just silver. Or gold. Or dollar.
Although you can't stand it, I still agree. :D
Agree. Agree. Agree.

You called it 'relative prices'.
I called it 'value'.
Mere semantics.

Like your recent charts too. Good for giving you an insight into forward prices (not front running! :cool: ) Very becoming. Who would have thought? :)
I wasn't striving for your agree or disagree.
I made clear what you failed to make clear.
Your 'void in a wallet' is not a void in assets.
Silver nor dollarpaper/cotton nor dollarink nor dollarelectronic figures disappear when their prices drop relative to other prices.
Your denominator is dollar.
My denominators are all the assets that are ones start and end, and where the monetary asset served as inbetween step to.

:lol: Good morning!
I agree! I agree! I agree!
Silver nor dollarpaper/cotton disappear when their prices drop relative to other prices (Pirocco code for value ;) )
This was figurative speech. :) Not literal. ;)
I will try to make clear what you have failed - your 'relative prices' code uses dollar as the denominator for inbetween step. (Pirocco code for not want to measure in fiat, but unable to avoid). :P
Good day.
 
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
Although you can't stand it, I still agree. :D
Agree. Agree. Agree.

You called it 'relative prices'.
I called it 'value'.
Mere semantics.

Like your recent charts too. Good for giving you an insight into forward prices (not front running! :cool: ) Very becoming. Who would have thought? :)
I wasn't striving for your agree or disagree.
I made clear what you failed to make clear.
Your 'void in a wallet' is not a void in assets.
Silver nor dollarpaper/cotton nor dollarink nor dollarelectronic figures disappear when their prices drop relative to other prices.
Your denominator is dollar.
My denominators are all the assets that are ones start and end, and where the monetary asset served as inbetween step to.

:lol: Good morning!
I agree! I agree! I agree!
Silver nor dollarpaper/cotton disappear when their prices drop relative to other prices (Pirocco code for value ;) )
This was figurative speech. :) Not literal. ;)
I will try to make clear what you have failed - your 'relative prices' code uses dollar as the denominator for inbetween step. (Pirocco code for not want to measure in fiat, but unable to avoid). :P
Good day.

try not to take a fight with Pirocco.he might give u a longer than before respond... :P
 
wrcmad said:
:lol: Good morning!
I agree! I agree! I agree!
Silver nor dollarpaper/cotton disappear when their prices drop relative to other prices (Pirocco code for value ;) )
This was figurative speech. :) Not literal. ;)
I will try to make clear what you have failed - your 'relative prices' code uses dollar as the denominator for inbetween step. (Pirocco code for not want to measure in fiat, but unable to avoid). :P
Good day.
If your smilies were corn you'd do a good job feeding my chickens.
Nicely arranged in a row, with little arguments between. :D
 
dragafem said:
try not to take a fight with Pirocco.he might give u a longer than before respond... :P
No. Not a fight.
I like Pirocco... he gives me good entertainment, I give him corn. :D :D :D
 
wrcmad said:
No. Not a fight.
I like Pirocco... he gives me good entertainment, I give him corn. :D :D :D
Again 3 corn in a row for my chickens. You'll make them fat and lazy this way. I think I'm gonna hoard these for tomorrow. And bonus, if you fail to deliver, I have a buffer.
 
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
No. Not a fight.
I like Pirocco... he gives me good entertainment, I give him corn. :D :D :D
Again 3 corn in a row for my chickens. You'll make them fat and lazy this way. I think I'm gonna hoard these for tomorrow. And bonus, if you fail to deliver, I have a buffer.
OK, I'll back off on the corn... it is quite clear you are very proficient at feeding the chooks, and do it quite frequently. ;)
 
wrcmad said:
OK, I'll back off on the corn... it is quite clear you are very proficient at feeding the chooks, and do it quite frequently. ;)
You just gave another one.
INC %CornStack
INC %Independency
 
wrcmad said:
Pirocco said:
wrcmad said:
No. Not a fight.
I like Pirocco... he gives me good entertainment, I give him corn. :D :D :D
Again 3 corn in a row for my chickens. You'll make them fat and lazy this way. I think I'm gonna hoard these for tomorrow. And bonus, if you fail to deliver, I have a buffer.
OK, I'll back off on the corn... it is quite clear you are very proficient at feeding the chooks, and do it quite frequently. ;)
aaaaaannnd another one through to the keeper
 
Back
Top