mmissinglink
Active Member
This may be the big drop below $20 that I was warning about this week coming on now....on your knees, silver!!!
Chillidog said:many there remember silver pushing $50 so are licking their wounds. The same people would think silver is cheap at the moment and are adding to their stack.
thatguy said:#Breaking - Federal Reserve #FOMC statement says no taper, Federal Funds rate UNCHANGED at 0.00-0.25%. #finance #economy
Nothing really changed but gold's taking it hardhttp://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-06-19/fomc-hints-no-taper-yet
The much-anticipated statement of the most powerful body in the world is upon us -
*FED MAINTAINS $85 BILLION MONTHLY PACE OF BOND BUYING
*FED SAYS LABOR MARKET SHOWS `FURTHER IMPROVEMENT'
*FED SAYS DOWNSIDE RISKS DIMINISHED SINCE AUTUMN
*BULLARD, GEORGE DISSENT FROM FOMC STATEMENT
and - as usual - there's a little in there for everyone.
Pre-FOMC: S&P 500 Futs 1645, 10Y 2.21%, USDJPY 95.25, Gold $1375, Oil $98.50![]()
Bernanke On Soaring Rates: "We Were A Little Puzzled By That"Ronnie 666 said:Look at the 10 year rate ! 2.36% - they can't afford that Bernanke is done, bring on the new money printer
http://www.marketwatch.com/investin...=50&lf=1&lf2=4&lf3=0&type=2&size=2&style=1013
anyone seen the plot?QUESTION: Mr. Chairman, you've always argued that it's the stock of assets that the Federal Reserve holds which affects long-term interest rates.
How do you reconcile that with the very sharp rise in real interest rates that we've seen in recent weeks? And do you think the market is correctly interpreting what you think is most likely to be the future path of the Federal Reserve's stock of assets? Thank you.
BERNANKE: Well, we -- we were a little puzzled by that. It was -- it was bigger than can be explained, I think, by changes in the ultimate stock of asset purchases within reasonable ranges, so I think we have to conclude that there are other factors at work, as well, including, again, some optimism about the economy, maybe some uncertainty arising. So I'm agreeing with you that -- that it seems larger than can be explained by a changing view of monetary policy.