Pirocco
Well-Known Member
Isn't that pimple on the other side of the monetary multiplier?tolly_67 said:The point I was trying to make is that he was linking Q.E. with the stock market in a simple cause and effect relationship which is simplistic and wrong. He fails to understand the real driver of the market. Q.E. or tapering is but a pimple on an elephants ass when you look at capital flows globally.
QE brought expectations.
The authors of QE don't like general price risings in an uncontrolled/noncontained fashion.
On the other hand, they don't like seeing the places where they steal, get empty, with nothing or what is hard to steal left.
So, their rather obvious motive is to get rid on bank deposits, in one way or another.
One way, is to trick people into paying temporary bloated prices, prices that their buddies increased by backing up the truck earlier.
To then drive the truck back, and dump it for sale. They don't need the dollarprofits, remember, they are the dollarcreation-privileged side. All they want, is to destory existing dollars, as to give their new no competition, and thus can continue to spend, without general price risings, simply because the losing side lacks the bank deposits to spend.
Stock markets sit over recordhighs. It must be their wet dream to lure people further in even from those levels. What you name as 'elephants ass', is in reality the ass of an inflated plastic elephant. Some people sit on its top. New people join them. Then they will open the valve.
That's what I think is happening, based on a number of elements, and a certain level of understanding of the whole.
But I and anyone can be wrong nevertheless, so if you think something else is going on, feel free to explain.