Nugget said:
Pirocco said:
This determined tax on silver and NOT on gold just proves once again that they want to drive precious metals savers to gold, a market they control way better than silver.
In Netherland there is a determined legal case going on about this tax difference gold versus silver:
http://www.silvertv.tv/index.php?option=com_content&view=section&layout=blog&id=2&Itemid=3
I think the reason would have far more to do with that the big money stacks gold (denser concentration of wealth) and of course they're not going to want their preferred PM taxed
That 'big money' doesn't need denser concentration of wealth.
Do you think 'big money' can't afford 50 times bigger storage facilities?
Do you think the 'big money' acquisition of a cheaper precious metal itself wouldn't erase the very property 'cheaper'?
How did they acquire that 'big money'. Competition on a free market? Or consequences of / interventions by central planning?
Of course they don't WANT gold to not be taxed. That it also IS not taxed, indicates exactly the link between central planning and your 'big money'.
And there you arrived on exactly what I said: they control the gold market better than the silver market.
Nugget said:
As an aside - the 20% VAT on Silver and not Gold would mean that Gold would be what I'd stack if I were in the UK
Also as an aside -
Imagine the entire world taxed silver 1%
Imagine the entire world taxed silver 50%
Imagine the entire world taxed silver 99%
Do you think tax makes a difference then?
Tax is essentially just another argument based on competition. If there is no place that sells silver without tax then you pay the price and you receive the price.
I see it on auction sites. People bid more than the silver price without tax.
At least half the tax you get back, and if you are willing to put some time/effort in it, even less.
That causes the tax burden to be spreaded uniformly.
It's only when you sell back to dealers that you suffer the immediate loss (and not only tax, also the silver kind (ASE/MP/etc) premiums are lost).
Look at ebay. Often you read on forums posts alike "look they pay DOH! higher prices on ebay, those people must be <UGLYWORDHERE>!"
But that is exactly what I ment, the ebay fee has the same effect as tax. But ebay has alternatives (auction sites that don't demand fees).
This UK - Guernsey Islands example shows that the foreign alternatives are taken out.
For a UK based person, that means that selling in UK itself is spreading the cost inflicted by the tax element, you pay more, but you get more.
Selling to foreign countries is an extra burden (foreign tax insertion(Guernsey example) shipping costs/extra risks) that can easily equal the local tax cost.
Maybe for those that do NOT stack the precious metal, but play the cyclic game sell/buy back in game instead, tax makes it harder. But on the other hand, the gold market has less newbies willing to pay too much, so the profit outlook there is smaller. So that's why even those (temporary!) opt for silver, despite tax, haha. But as said, that's cyclic game doesnt stack the metal, and you clearly said 'would be what I'd STACK'.