U.S. strikes Syrian military airfield

Aureus

Aureus

Active Member
Silver Stacker
and pop.

watch this space I guess, metals are gonna like the news for a bit at least i'm sure.
 
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh believes that Hillary Clinton approved the sending of sarin gas to Syria. At a time when Clinton is trying to secure the 2016 democratic presidential nomination, Hersh is coming forward with allegations that the democratic presidential front-runner and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a go-between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Middle Eastern nations (namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey) to set up a horrific sarin gas attack and place the blame on the shoulders of Assad. Why? So that the U.S. could invade Syria and blame Assad.

"By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi's arsenals into Syria."
Hersh didn't elaborate as to whether the "arms" he referred to encompassed the chemical precursors for creating sarin gas, which Libya stockpiled. However, multiple independent reports have independently confirmed that Gaddafi of Libya did, indeed, possess such stockpiles. Additionally, the The Free Thought Project reports, the much-touted U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya was operating as a "rat line" for Gaddafi's weaponry while Hillary Clinton was at the helm.

Seymour Hersh

http://www.inquisitr.com/3059683/hi...-approved-sending-sarin-gas-to-syrian-rebels/
 
JulieW said:
Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh believes that Hillary Clinton approved the sending of sarin gas to Syria. At a time when Clinton is trying to secure the 2016 democratic presidential nomination, Hersh is coming forward with allegations that the democratic presidential front-runner and former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was a go-between the Obama Administration and the leaders of Middle Eastern nations (namely Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and Turkey) to set up a horrific sarin gas attack and place the blame on the shoulders of Assad.

Seymour Hersh

http://www.inquisitr.com/3059683/hi...-approved-sending-sarin-gas-to-syrian-rebels/
Click to expand...

Trump must release this information, when do you think he will twit it and arrest Hillary?
 
Putines response to this has the potential to send metals flying upwards. I'm sure that everyone knows that this attack is basically an act of war. If that becomes official, then metals should fly to the moon.
 
Silver_Dealar said:
Purine response to this has the potential to send metals flying upwards. I'm sure that everyone knows that this attack is basically an act of war. If that becomes official, then metals should fly to the moon.
Click to expand...

Whats your definition of the Da Moon?
 
Ipv6Ready said:
Silver_Dealar said:
Purine response to this has the potential to send metals flying upwards. I'm sure that everyone knows that this attack is basically an act of war. If that becomes official, then metals should fly to the moon.
Click to expand...

Whats your definition of the Da Moon?
Click to expand...

If a war were to break out, I wouldn't be surprised to see USD $25-$30 in the short term. I mean, look at how much silver moved in a matter of days in 2011, it is possible.
 
Kremlin: 'Aggression against a sovereign nation'
Posted at 16:01 BREAKING
Russian President Vladimir Putin's spokesman has described the US air strikes on the Shayrat airbase as an "aggression against a sovereign nation". Mr Putin sees them as an "attempt to distract the world from civilian casualties from US military action in Iraq," and they "do significant damage" to US-Russia ties", Dmitry Peskov said.
 
after the 59 Tomahawk strike the airfield is operational again, plane still flying from there.
 
alor said:
after the 59 Tomahawk strike the airfield is operational again, plane still flying from there.
Click to expand...

Trump should man up and drop a nuclear bomb. Show the world he is a real man.
 
To describe the US attack on Syria as a serious development is to be guilty of understatement.

Without any recourse to international law or the United Nations, the Trump administration has embarked on an act of international aggression against yet another sovereign state in the Middle East, confirming that neocons have reasserted their dominance over US foreign policy in Washington. It is an act of aggression that ends any prospect of dtente between Washington and Moscow in the foreseeable future, considerably increasing tensions between Russia and the US not only in the Middle East but also in Eastern Europe, where NATO troops have been conducting military exercises for some time in striking distance of Russian territory.

In the wake of the horrific images that emerged from Idlib after the alleged sarin gas attack, the clamour for regime change in Damascus has reached a crescendo in the West, with politicians and media outlets rushing to judgement in ascribing responsibility for the attack to the Syrian government. No one knows with any certainty what happened in Idlib, which is why an independent investigation should have been agreed and undertaken in pursuit of the truth and, with it, justice.

However only the most nave among us could believe that this US airstrike against Syria was unleashed with justice in mind. How could it be when US bombs have been killing civilians, including children, in Mosul recently? And how could it be given the ineffable suffering of Yemeni children as a result of Saudi Arabia's brutal military campaign there?

No, this US attack, reportedly involving 59 Tomahawk missiles being launched from ships in the eastern Mediterranean, was carried out with regime change in mind, setting a precedent that can only have serious ramifications for the entire region.

Regarding the attack in Idlib, what we can say with certainty is that a time when pro-government forces in Syria were in the ascendancy on the ground, and when the Syrian government was making significant progress on the diplomatic front, it would have constituted an act of ineffable self-harm to launch a chemical weapons attack of any kind, much less one of this magnitude. In fact it would have conformed to the actions of a government that was intent on bringing about its own demise. What also must be taken into consideration is the fact that the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), an organisation supported by the US, confirmed back in June 2014 that the process to destroy Syria's entire stock of chemical weapons had been completed.

Moreover, the horrific images and eyewitness testimony that have emanated from Idlib in the wake of the attack have come from pro-opposition sources. No Western journalist or news crew would dare set foot in Idlib, or indeed any other part of opposition-held territory in Syria, knowing that as soon as they did they would be abducted and slaughtered.

Trump has proved with this unilateral military intervention that he can easily be dragged into conflict. Just a few days after his administration confirmed that regime change in Syria was off the table, that its focus was on defeating terrorism, he unleashes an airstrike that will only have emboldened the very forces of terrorism whose defeat he had stressed was the focus of his foreign policy previously.

So what now? Clearly, this military action places Russia in a very difficult position. Since joining the conflict in Syria at the end of September 2015, at the behest of the country's government, Moscow had been working tirelessly to bring about a negotiated settlement, one involving opposition forces and parties deemed moderate relative to the Salafi-jihadi fanatics of ISIS and Nusra, etc. It is a diplomatic process that has just been dealt a shattering blow, with the opposition now undoubtedly convinced that regime change is in the offing via Washington and therefore encouraged to work towards this end.

more >

http://www.counterpunch.org/2017/04/07/airstrikes-without-justice/
Click to expand...
 
Yep.. It was 100% trump would be a peace loving no war kinda president, what was that? 2 months?.. Deplorables :rolleyes:
 
Women & children among casualties of US missile strike Homs governor

US fired missiles, because Assad is to blame for causing the bombs to drop in the first place, now that we know https://www.rt.com/news/383968-civilians-killed-syria-airbase-attack/ civilians got killed here. then the blame is Assad killed his own people, so Trump must drop more bombs again, cause Assad has caused the miscalculation... :lol:
 
Let's solve violence with more violence... That seems like an appropriate response.
 
So Trump is now a murderer. Most politicians get broken into it slowly, with motions and off to war votes. This man now has his own conscience full of innocent victims of his order.
 
18747_c80pg8rvyaevjbl.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top