Tony Abbott on 'Insiders' at 9am.

Which was one of my original points. You cannot "have" something if you cannot take it away. This is fundamental to "having" natural rights (and the associated concept of natural law). This is a very important point. The concept of inalienability is different to the way it has been used in this debate.

Edit: Simply think about punishment. You cannot punish a murderer without taking away their natural rights.
 
SS so you don't think people have the right to choose to end their lives? Or are you opposed to euthanasia without consent (murder).
 
Your making it impossible to talk to you about this so im not going to bother.
Take away that statement

"You cannot "have" something if you cannot take it away" and I want you to go round and ask people to think about that statement.

You can punish a murderer without taking away their rights....

think about it....
 
col0016 said:
SS so you don't think people have the right to choose to end their lives? Or are you opposed to euthanasia without consent (murder).
Click to expand...

Ive answered this.... above. Im not speaking about this anymore
 
SilverSanchez said:
Your making it impossible to talk to you about this so im not going to bother.
Take away that statement

"You cannot "have" something if you cannot take it away" and I want you to go round and ask people to think about that statement.

You can punish a murderer without taking away their rights....

think about it....
Click to expand...
Uh-huh. Yep. Convinced me with that one.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top