You dont understand how comodities work lol.
Because those shinny metals get used to make shit which is what gives them value.
Eg those computers that store cryptos on.
So your comparing apples to oranges, and your statement about metals value is the value some one assigns to them is wrong, simplified and silly.
It will be flawed by one single notion - you believe price is directly underpinned by production costs, and not derived by supply and demand.I intend to write an article, create a thread or even a video outlining everything I understand and providing all links and sources to back up my understanding, beliefs and position. I'll post it up here when that time comes. I'm not claiming my analysis is correct, it just makes sense to me and enabled me to feel confident in my decision to buy and hold PMs... specifically silver.
It will be flawed by one single notion - you believe price is underpinned by production costs, and not derived by supply and demand.

Probably this statement:It interests me to know what you read and how you have chosen to interpret what I have written. I had outlined above that the ongoing environment of year-on-year deficits between mining SUPPLY vs global DEMAND makes the cost of production relevant.
Global AISC has been falling for a few years, while at the same time global silver supplies have been consistently in supply/demand surplus. There is always some +ve correlation coefficient between AISC and silver price, no matter how small that is.In an environment of year-on-year deficits between mine supply and global demand, the primary silver miners have never been more critical in establishing a bottom for the silver price. This bottom is $15-17USD for me. Many people tout the fact that byproduct mining making up the majority of silver production is the sole reason why silver can go much lower. This may be the case if we didn't have deficits in supply/demand and also had an abundance of above ground available stockpiles, but we don't. The bottoming of the silver price has directly correlated with the AISC of the primary silver miners over the past 15 or so years.
Definitely provocative - I like to delve deeper where I see data that can be disputed... it tends to result in me learning something new.Knowing that you are, in many ways, an intelligent and reasonably educated individual, I'm inclined to believe that the true intentions behind your mildly provocative comment was to simply flex your position as a bona fide
Global AISC has been falling for a few years, while at the same time global silver supplies have been consistently in supply/demand surplus.
The primary miners represent <30% of global mine supply, and about 23% of total global supply, so I'd suggest the focus on this factor misrepresents the bigger picture.My point with AISC have been specifically focused on the primary miners.
I don't believe this to be true, and industry insiders like Bron have also disputed you on this point in the recent past.They do and will withhold selling a portion of their production when price moves "Too low".
Actually, on the contrary - this is your focus. That is what I pointed out above in post #67.No one metric should be used to determine when silver is undervalued. You specially narrow your sights in on the AISC.
I don't believe this to be true, and industry insiders like Bron have also disputed you on this point in the recent past.
The primary miners represent <30% of global mine supply, and about 23% of total global supply, so I'd suggest the focus on this factor misrepresents the bigger picture.
Actually, on the contrary - this is your focus. That is what I pointed out above in post #67.
My view is that AISC has nothing to do with price - I am a believer in the supply/demand price balance.
I feel like I owe you money after reading your in depth posts, much appreciated, a genuine wealth of knowledgeThere are so many. Much of the supply and demand data comes from silverinstitute.org -
The known silver deposits in Australia were taken from Geoscience Australia:
https://www.ga.gov.au/education/classroom-resources/minerals-energy/australian-mineral-facts/silver#:~:text=Australia has the largest share,lead-zinc-silver deposits.
Things like All-in-sustaining-costs can be taken from mining companies, but that data is constantly manipulated to appease existing and prospective investors and it's my understanding the AISCs typically don't include Administration costs not directly associated with production and other important elements, like interest paid on loans. AISC data by itself from a single company is pretty much useless information. But aggregate data suggests an AISC average for the primary silver miners is around the $15USD range. The chart data has also shown that when silver dips below $15, it encounters enough resistance to make any time spent below $15 a relatively short-lived event, and a buying opportunity for me.
my understanding has been obtained by 1000's of hours research and study into as many areas I could in an attempt to understand benefits and risks In holding PM as a financial asset. It's still just my personal opinion, formulated over years of analysing the benefits and risks associated with using PMS as a long-term saving and retirement strategy. I don't have singular sources, however, the silver institute does provide a comprehensive analysis of mine supply, global demand and a general breakdown of where the demand is coming from.
Gold had my interest when its price was around the $1100USD range, as this was my assessment of when gold was undervalued relative to production costs globally. Of course, USD strength is also an important factor to consider.
Here's an article which provides a bit of insight to mine lifespan, but most can be calculated by the annual production output vs estimated reserves.
https://www.mining-technology.com/features/feature-the-10-biggest-silver-mines-in-the-world/#:~:text=Fresnillo is also considered to,estimated to be 12 years.
You can compare the reserves to annual production and get a reasonable idea of how what volume of reserves = actual production over time and get an idea of a mines lifespan in the short to mid-term. There were more primary silver mines than I thought there'd be which have an estimated lifespan of 10 years or fewer.
I intend to write an article, create a thread or even a video outlining everything I understand and providing all links and sources to back up my understanding, beliefs and position. I'll post it up here when that time comes. I'm not claiming my analysis is correct, it just makes sense to me and enabled me to feel confident in my decision to buy and hold PMs... specifically silver.
I will add, I am subject to confirmation Bias since 2018, but the majority of my views on silver were formulated between 2014-2018, all whilst having little exposure to the metal, if any at all. 2018 presented an opportunity that I took advantage of. The same is true for March this year.
It may be worth sharing that a sizeable portion of my stack is made up of 1oz coins. The rest is in 10oz and kilo bars, nothing larger. I did this to provide more options when the time comes to sell, with particular focus on having the flexibility of liquidating in small portions, rather than bulk. 100oz bars were the most appealing in relation to size and price over spot, but coins suited my needs when speculating on certain outcomes relating to price movements and options to sell outside of the 'dealer sphere' - a decision I am yet to regret.
It goes without saying though; buying Bullion when the market is low @ and/or as close to spot will be most advantageous. If selling below or @ spot to a dealer, you will only need a marginal uptick in spot price to break even or be in the profit. The 1oz coins were a choice I made and don't think it's the best decision for most, yet it was a decision I was happy to live with whilst understanding the sacrifices I was making in regards to volume and the $$ cost average per Oz.
I feel like I owe you money after reading your in depth posts, much appreciated, a genuine wealth of knowledge
Thanks STKR for the insight. Do you put much weight into price manipulation and/or price discovery interference claims long term? IE differences in paper vs physical prices, concentrated long/short ETF positions, money printing being funnelled into certain asset classes etc.
Or would you expect the fundamentals are strong enough to overcome these over your 10+ year investment timeframe mentioned?
What is worth mentioning, is in the current situation with price setting on the comex, there is only so low they can influence the price for any length of time. As I've mentioned in the previous posts, the AISC of the primary miners have appeared to be a decisive factor in setting a bottom in the silver price.