Preciousmetal
New Member
Hi,
I'm new here. I thought I would introduce what I hope is an interesting topic.
I have been involved in stacking gold for several years now, and got heavily into silver last October. I follow the various silver videoblogs on Youtube pretty much on a daily basis. Although there's a lot of fluff there, it's been nice to have the support. Unfortunately, I do not know of such a community on the gold side.
That being said, I also noticed that as silver reached above $30, there was more and more infighting between the silver video bloggers. As silver peaked at $49 and went through its pullback/mini-crash, the bickering got really bad. It also seems that lots of the bloggers have gone through a metamorphosis. Some of it has been positive where an ability to reassess previous assumptions has been observed. However, some bloggers have proven to be nothing but volatile (e.g. "I'm calling you out" Rawdoglet - he should call himself out for changing his positions so many times).
As I observed all these various changes, one thing crossed my mind. For sure, much of what occurred can be attributed to human nature, the love of authority, and even processes of maturing thought. However, I also wonder whether any of this can be attributed to disinformation agents who infiltrated this particular movement, and - to a certain degree - might have been instrumental in turning blogger against blogger.
I am interested to see if anyone else has had any similar thoughts...
I'm new here. I thought I would introduce what I hope is an interesting topic.
I have been involved in stacking gold for several years now, and got heavily into silver last October. I follow the various silver videoblogs on Youtube pretty much on a daily basis. Although there's a lot of fluff there, it's been nice to have the support. Unfortunately, I do not know of such a community on the gold side.
That being said, I also noticed that as silver reached above $30, there was more and more infighting between the silver video bloggers. As silver peaked at $49 and went through its pullback/mini-crash, the bickering got really bad. It also seems that lots of the bloggers have gone through a metamorphosis. Some of it has been positive where an ability to reassess previous assumptions has been observed. However, some bloggers have proven to be nothing but volatile (e.g. "I'm calling you out" Rawdoglet - he should call himself out for changing his positions so many times).
As I observed all these various changes, one thing crossed my mind. For sure, much of what occurred can be attributed to human nature, the love of authority, and even processes of maturing thought. However, I also wonder whether any of this can be attributed to disinformation agents who infiltrated this particular movement, and - to a certain degree - might have been instrumental in turning blogger against blogger.
I am interested to see if anyone else has had any similar thoughts...