His Gold, Guns and a Getaway Plan was first quoted around 2009 from memory, so I don't think it's super urgent, though it's a great slogan. Gerald cranks up some beauties. Another one I like is 'when people have nothing left to lose, they lose it'.
I really like Gerald Celente but his predictions past a one month timescale are like everyone else. Dart throwing.
You're right, "dart throwing"

Not to mention obscene teenager language.
Yes, the Guns, Gold and a Getaway Plan sounds great

But he's right: if you were from Venezuela, Greece... wouldn't you want to get away?
What I could sum up about Celente:
1. PAPAGALLO:
Gerald Celente keeps repeating himself. I remember him saying that his father once told him "papagallo" (parrot in Italian), because instead of thinking for himself, he keeps repeating things that others say.
It looks like he's still "papagallo" today, because he's repeating a few ideas over and over again.
I'm stunned how many TV shows invite him again and again. He keeps saying the same things again and again. Papagallo!
And he's quite ill-informed, especially about certain countries. Countless factual misunderstandings (his sources are to blame, though).
2. BANDWAGON PREDICTIONS:
Yes, he predicts a crisis each year. And I don't know how he can keep up with the same enthusiasm and typical "Italian fire".
I love Italians, don't get me wrong!
He is poor in originality. 90 % of his bandwagon speech has already been said (back in 2012... 2014... 2017...)... by him!
Schiff is great, he's like an avalanche of arguments. Very detailed analyses. He too can keep the "fire" up and runnin'.

Bought some of Schiff's books.
But his voice is so abrasive and exhausting to listen to.
The most pleasant soft voice to listen to is James Rickards. But he seems too flat serious.
So a combination of the three will get you entertained and (quite) informed
Marc Faber is original with great vision, pleasant to listen to.
Jim Rogers seems stuck somewhere in 2008. Read one of his books, but now he bores me down. I don't know it it's age or what he's (not been) doing, but he doesn't have much clue about the latest trends in the world. Lacks depth.