The Case for Private, Programmable Digital Cash

Bullion Baron

Well-Known Member
Silver Stacker
It’s been a while since I last posted here... it's been good to come back and see the forum refreshed and under new (mystery ) ownership. It feels like the start of a new phase.

I checked back in partly because metals have been on an absolute tear. Prices are moving, sentiment is changing, and this year I’ve started to lighten my load a little. Not exiting, just trimming. Scaling back toward a core position over the months and years ahead rather than holding everything.

That process has forced me to think again about why I hold what I hold, and where I’m willing to take asymmetric risk outside of physical assets. This post is partly that thinking written down, and partly an invitation for others to share projects they think genuinely respect privacy and fungibility. I don’t hold many crypto positions anymore. In fact, the one I share below is the only one that’s remotely significant for me right now, simply because the opportunity feels too skewed to ignore.

Most people who stack gold or silver already understand that money is not just about price. It’s about freedom, control, and the ability to transact without permission. Physical cash and precious metals gave us that for a long time. You can trade directly, without intermediaries, without surveillance, and without leaving a permanent record.

Digital money was supposed to extend that freedom globally. Instead, most public blockchains became a permanent surveillance ledger. Every transaction visible. Every balance traceable. Forever. Where your coins come from is tracked. Who touched them leaves a trail.

That breaks one of the core properties money needs to function properly: fungibility. One unit should equal another unit regardless of history. Once money carries baggage, it stops being neutral. And once money is no longer neutral, it is no longer free.

In the real world, privacy is not radical. It’s normal. Your bank doesn’t publish your transaction history (to everyone ). Your employer doesn’t see where you spend your salary. The retailer doesn’t know where your cash came from. Crypto flipped that expectation and then seemed surprised when adoption didn't take off.

People don’t want their finances broadcast. Businesses can’t operate that way. If crypto is ever going to move beyond gambling on price, privacy has to be the default again, not something you have to opt into or apologise for.

This is where Tari comes in (MinoTari on CMC).

Tari is built with privacy at the protocol level, not bolted on later. Confidential transactions are the default. From the ground up, the assumption is that users should not leak their financial lives just to participate in the network.

That already puts it in a small group, but what makes it more interesting is how it differs from other well-known privacy projects.

Monero is still the gold standard for private digital cash. It does one thing extremely well: private, fungible payments. But Monero is intentionally conservative and not programmable in the modern smart-contract sense. That makes it excellent money, but limits what can be built on top of it.

Zcash took a different path. It introduced powerful cryptography, but privacy is optional. Most transactions remain transparent. That weakens fungibility and turns privacy into a feature rather than a baseline. It's also not programmable.

Tari sits somewhere else entirely. Privacy is default, like Monero, but the roadmap includes a programmable Layer 2 (testnet next quarter). The aim is not just private money, but private applications, private stablecoins, and eventually private payments between autonomous software agents.

Tari’s lead developer is a core contributor to the Monero protocol. These are builders who have already taken an idea from obscurity to real-world use. They understand privacy at a level most projects simply don’t.

Stablecoins are already one of the largest real use cases in crypto... yet almost all of them leak everything. Who paid who. How much. When. Forever. That doesn’t scale to real-world use. It’s a compliance layer disguised as innovation.

A stablecoin that settles confidentially by default changes the equation. It restores what cash used to do, while keeping instant global settlement. That isn’t a niche feature. It’s a prerequisite for mass adoption.

This becomes even more important when you consider what comes next. The next wave of economic activity won’t just be humans. It will be software. AI agents buying data, paying for services, settling invoices, operating continuously in the background.

That brings me to the investment opportunity (maybe better described as speculation ).

All pricing is USD to keep things easier.

Tari’s market cap is roughly $6M. The current price is around $0.002 per token.

At $0.002, $1,000 buys about 500,000 tokens.

If, over time, Tari were to reach a $1B market cap, the price would be around $0.20 assuming a ~5B circulating supply (as a PoW coin, emissions are currently quite high). That’s a 100x from here. $1,000 becomes $100,000. I think Tari has potential to be even larger than this.

That is not a prediction. It’s a scenario. One that requires patience. It could fail. It could take far longer than expected.

But this is what people mean by an asymmetric bet. The downside is capped at what you allocate. The upside, if it works, is many multiples of that. One of the main reasons Tari is priced where it is today has very little to do with the technology itself, and a lot to do with access.

Tari is not yet listed on any major exchanges. Liquidity mostly lives on smaller venues, through mining, or via wrapped versions of the token. That naturally keeps awareness low and friction high, which tends to suppress price regardless of fundamentals.

That is slowly starting to change. Kraken has already added the wrapped version, wXTM, to its public listing roadmap. Wrapped assets are often the first step toward broader exchange support and deeper liquidity. When access improves, the pool of potential buyers expands very quickly.

For anyone who chooses to explore it further, there are currently a few different ways to acquire Tari, each with its own trade-offs:

1. Buy USDT on any exchange. Transfer it to SafeTrade (non-KYC exchange). Purchase XTM (the native token). Then withdraw it to your own wallet using the Tari Universe app. If you self-custody, write down your seed phrase and store it safely. If you lose the seed phrase or share it, the tokens are gone forever.

2. Buy wXTM on Uniswap. This works if you already use an Ethereum wallet. Same rules about seed phrase protection apply.

3. Buy XTM or wXTM on Gate or MEXC. This is the easiest method. Just remember that leaving tokens on exchanges carries risk.

4. Mine Tari slowly over time if you have a gaming PC. You can download Tari Universe and mine directly. This spreads your entry cost out over time, however it would take a long time to acquire a meaningful amount. Software is at tari.com. I have a mini PC with a beefy CPU and it earns 100-200 XTM daily.

I’d be genuinely interested to hear what other privacy-focused projects people here are watching or hold. This just happens to be the only one I currently hold in any size, because the risk-reward at these levels feels, frankly, absurd.

Privacy isn’t a feature. It’s the foundation. And Tari is one of the few projects building as if that is important.
 
I remember writing about many silver miners that no one had heard of in ~2009-2010, including CCU. They flew until they didn't :cool:

It's a small cap coin and not well known at present, but has one of the ex-lead contributors to Monero working on it and anyone who has been around crypto for a while should recognise him (fluffypony).
 
I'm so confused. The only thing that might make sense is that you were fooled into visiting a distillery by a fake BB... is that what happened?
 
All good

On the topic of 'privacy coins' by the way, the chart for Monero looks very similar (compressed version) to the chart of silver in USD over the past 50 years. Breakout would have a positive flow on effect across the entire privacy coin space IMO.

1766358408153.webp
 
I'll bite on the topic. Why use this coin over bitcoin on a higher layer? Liquid BTC has confidential transactions. Lightning payments have pretty decent privacy for the payer. Chaumian eCash layers such as Cashu and Fedimint have excellent privacy (but do introduce counterparty risk).

All these solutions have various tradeoffs of course, but have the advantage that they are all denominated in bitcoin, and thus have the monetary properties of bitcoin.

A $6M market cap coin Any coin other than bitcoin is making plenty of tradeoffs in security and centralisation.
 
We already have digital money which works somewhat .
Never had any problems paying for groceries with a debt card or settling a transaction on SS via bank transfer except when experiencing power and internet outages which is very frustrating.
Why we need a new programmable CBCD and crypto which requires the grid and internet to operate raises suspicions that it won’t benefit me in any shape or form.
I’m at easy the most when paying with cash, I don’t get anxious that their may be some sought of outage
 
Last edited:
I'll bite on the topic. Why use this coin over bitcoin on a higher layer? Liquid BTC has confidential transactions. Lightning payments have pretty decent privacy for the payer. Chaumian eCash layers such as Cashu and Fedimint have excellent privacy (but do introduce counterparty risk).

All these solutions have various tradeoffs of course, but have the advantage that they are all denominated in bitcoin, and thus have the monetary properties of bitcoin.

A $6M market cap coin Any coin other than bitcoin is making plenty of tradeoffs in security and centralisation.
Fair comment and I agree that Bitcoin-denominated layers have a strong appeal because they inherit Bitcoin’s monetary properties. But I think the denomination itself is also a major limitation for real economic use.

Bitcoin is extremely volatile. Even in strong cycles it regularly experiences 50–80% drawdowns. For any business or individual trying to use crypto for serious payments, that volatility is a non-starter.

Bitcoin’s base layer is expensive and slow by design, and while second-layer and sidechain solutions improve things, they all introduce trade-offs as you mention.

I’m not claiming that Tari, especially at its current size, is “ready for prime time.” It isn’t. At a ~$6M market cap, this is clearly a speculative bet on where a use case could go, not a finished mainstream payment network.

Where I see the long-term opportunity is in privacy-first systems that are designed that way from the ground up, rather than bolting privacy onto transparent architectures. Once you assume widespread chain analysis powered by AI, fungibility breaks very quickly on public ledgers. Even very careful, security-conscious Bitcoin users struggle to maintain meaningful privacy if a primary address is ever linked to them.

One additional point... while Tari is still early, the network design around mining is already quite thoughtful. It runs four mining lanes (algos), supporting ASIC, GPU, and CPU mining, and the hashrate across those lanes is already impressive for a network of this size. Combined with the fact that Tari Universe makes mining almost a one-click install on Windows and Mac, it lowers the barrier to participation dramatically (more participation in consensus = greater decentralisation IMO). Most protocols still expect complex setups and command-line tooling. Being able to mine on a home PC brings things closer to the early days of Bitcoin, when anyone could realistically participate, rather than today’s model where most hash power lives in large, specialised mining farms.
We already have digital money which works somewhat .
Never had any problems paying for groceries with a debt card or settling a transaction on SS via bank transfer except when experiencing power and internet outages which is very frustrating.
Why we need a new programmable CBCD and crypto which requires the grid and internet to operate raises suspicions that it won’t benefit me in any shape or form.
I’m at easy the most when paying with cash, I don’t get anxious that their may be some sought of outage
I mostly agree with you.

For everyday use, fiat infrastructure generally works. Paying for groceries, tapping a card, or settling a local transfer is usually frictionless.

Where I think crypto becomes useful isn’t as a replacement for that system, but as a complementary layer for emerging use cases where traditional rails either don’t work well or introduce unnecessary friction.

One example I mentioned is agent-driven commerce. The Tari team is building Blink, a shopping agent that uses debit cards backed by a stablecoin balance. There is no scenario where I would give an AI agent access to my real credit card. But a prepaid, capped balance that I manually top up and let an agent spend on my behalf is a very different proposition. That’s a category of use existing banking infrastructure isn’t designed for.

There’s also the merchant side. Credit card chargebacks and fraud are a significant cost, particularly online. For reputable businesses, final settlement at the point of purchase is attractive, and stablecoin-based systems can enable that in ways card networks can’t.

Last year I paid a software developer in Nigeria using stablecoins. It was faster, cheaper, and simpler than bank wires, and avoided a lot of intermediary friction.

Also, digital-native assets like NFTs, DeFi, and on-chain credentials exist whether we personally find them compelling or not. Those activities would benefit enormously from default privacy. Fully transparent systems like Ethereum expose users to risks most don’t fully understand e.g.

1766452491943.webp

So I’m not arguing that crypto replaces cash or fiat for everyday life. I don’t think that’s realistic or even desirable. I see it as an additional toolset for new categories of activity where privacy, programmability, and global settlement have importance.
 
Also, for anyone who believes in financial privacy rights in the online realm, consider signing this petition for a presidential pardon for two software developers being jailed for writing code.
100% agree that situation is terrible and hope it gets the attention of Trump for a pardon.
 
Back
Top