Skyrocket said:
Ghost said:
Big A.D. said:
Most people who claim asylum here are ultimately found to be genuine refugees fleeing persecution.
What a load of crap! Bypass 20 countries to get here, use their passports and huge amounts of money to make the journey but then loose all their documents moments before being picked up by customs or the Navy... Must be some pretty good green koolaid you're drinking...
Thanks again !
A true asylum seeker fleeing persecution or whatever would not care too much about which country they fled to as long as that country accepted them. A true asylum seeker would not bypass all those other countries with looser asylum seeker policies then ours to get to Australia which has one of the tightest policies in the world. That does NOT add up.
No it doesn't, and the reason why they don't go to any of those other countries is because they're not signatories to the UN Refugee Convention like we are.
We have an obligation - that we voluntarily took on - to look after asylum seekers.
Those dozen other countries between here and Syria have no such obligation. There is no such thing as an "asylum seeker" in Saudi Arabia, or the UAE, or Pakistan, or India, or Bangladesh, or Myanmar, Thailand, Malaysia or Indonesia. Africa can't look after the people there already, so going south isn't really an option. There's nothing to the north except uninhabitable desert and a few other countries that don't recognize refugees. Turkey, to the west is hosting more than a million refugees already and not coping well.
That leaves Western Europe to the north-west and Australia and New Zealand to the South East as viable options where asylum seekers can go to (a) not be persecuted and/or killed, and (b) get on with life in a new community.
We also have data on how many people arrive and how many are found to be legitimate asylum seekers i.e. the vast majority of them. We know they are, by and large, legitimate refugees but we can't legally chuck them on the first plane back to where they came from, so we stick them in concentration camps on desert islands.
And the whole thing is a charade to distract people from important issues, like how we maintain and improve our standard of living in a globalized economy.
Why is it that sovereignty is so important when it comes to a few dozen people on a boat, but as soon as a multi-national corporation moves a billion dollars overseas to avoid paying any tax the whole sovereignty thing suddenly becomes all a bit too hard?