stock market dangers

Peter

Well-Known Member
Five reasons to be wary of the markets
By Ian Verrender

Posted Mon 9 Jun 2014, 7:43am AEST
Prepare for the party hangover Photo: The party on stock exchanges probably still has some life in it, but there are some worrying signs. (Romeo Ranoco: Reuters)

There are some worrying features about global stock markets right now and just how mature the boom has become. Here are five reasons why you need to take care, writes Ian Verrender.

There's an old saying that stock market booms are built upon a wall of worry.

When it's running hot, everyone worries the rally has been overdone, as investors agonise over whether they had paid too much. And when the inevitable crash occurs, the worry is that the worst has yet to come.

But for a brief period before the collapse, an eerie calm descends. It happened in 2007, even in the final months of that year, despite overwhelming evidence that the money-go-round had run out of puff.

It was the same in 1987. John Spalvins, one of the aggressive breed of entrepreneurs of the day, abandoned his bearish outlook after 18 months of predicting a crash, threw caution to the wind and embarked upon a major acquisition spree.

Big mistake.

In the past fortnight, three of the world's most powerful central bankers - Dallas Federal Reserve chief Richard Fisher, Bank of England deputy governor Charles Bean and Italy's central bank governor Ignazio Visco - have noticed the same thing happening right now and have sounded warnings.

Before you become too alarmed, it's worth bearing in mind that these three gentlemen bear a large portion of the blame for the current state of global financial markets.

Radical monetary policy has depressed real interest rates to below zero and boosted demand for high-risk investments, including stocks. This is precisely what the global banking puppeteers wanted, so it is a little rich for them to be warning others of the pitfalls.

In any case, rather than ease off the gas, they now are preparing to add fuel to the fire, meaning the party on stock exchanges probably still has some life in it.

On Thursday night, the European Central Bank took the unprecedented step of cutting the rate it offers banks to minus 0.1 per cent.

That's right, minus 0.1 per cent! Any bank that wants to park spare cash with the ECB will have to pay for the privilege. If they feel they are scoring a dud deal, then perhaps they'll finally discover how the rest of us feel.

Despite all those who claim to have forecast the 2008 crash, myself included, no one can ever predict the timing.

Individual human behaviour still has us mystified. Put all those irrational beings together into a group and the psychology takes on a whole new dimension.

But there are some worrying features about global stock markets right now and just how mature this boom has become. Here are five reasons why you need to take care.

1.

When central bankers start issuing cautions, it is worth taking note, even if they are to blame for the problem in the first place.

In December 1996, Alan Greenspan issued his famous warning about "irrational exuberance", pointing out that investors no longer appeared to be worried about risk, and that the stock market didn't appear to be overly concerned about what was happening in the real economy.

It took four years for Greenspan's warnings to bear fruit when the tech bubble finally burst. Greenspan's loose monetary policy in the aftermath of that meltdown is often cited as one of the foundations for the credit crisis of 2008.

America's recovery from the financial crisis has been slow and tepid and in the first quarter of this year, growth reversed.

Despite that, Wall Street pushed further into record territory last week, rising to 16,836. In February 2009, the Dow Jones Industrial Average threatened to plunge through 7000. A disconnect with the real world? Or exuberance extrapolated?

2.

History tends to repeat. And over time, there are certain patterns that emerge that policymakers rely upon.

If you lower interest rates, people tend to borrow more. But if asset prices like stocks begin rising strongly, it is likely interest rates will rise in the future, so bond markets anticipate this.

That fundamental relationship has broken down. Stock markets are rising strongly. But market-based interest rates continue to fall. In essence, stock investors are predicting a recovery while bond investors fear the future.

A year ago, economists were warning this trend could not continue.

It is easy to understand why it has persisted. The relentless manipulation of the financial system by central bankers has completely distorted markets. Despite America's pledge to taper its money printing, there is no sign of a return to normal trading any time soon.

3.

In the final stages of a boom, big corporations bust out the takeovers. Often, these multi-billion-dollar deals are about the individual egos of the executives involved rather than in the interest of shareholders. Logically, they should buy other businesses when markets are down, not when they are booming.

In recent weeks, American and European pharmaceutical companies have unleashed a series of hugely expensive takeover bids with Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Allergan and Valeant featured.

After years of inactivity, Australian investment bankers suddenly have been inundated with work. Warrnambool Butter got the ball rolling late last year and since then, David Jones, Westfield Retail Trust and a host of minnows such as Crowe Horwath have come under attack. This has delivered sudden gains to shareholders and the prospect of fabulous riches to bonus-starved bankers.

The pace of merger activity appears to be rising to a level not seen since, er, 2006.

4.

Private equity firms have suddenly decided that now is a terrific time to unload some fabulous investment opportunities onto unsuspecting, sorry, lucky punters.

The modus operandi of these buccaneering outfits is to buy a busted company, sell off the best assets like the real estate, sack half the staff, load the company up with debt, pay themselves a whacking great dividend and then wait for a bout of irrational exuberance to float them on the stock exchange. Brilliant!

Most major financial publications have declared 2014 to be the year of the Private Equity IPO. And it's only June.

5.

If any single event in 2014 tells you that global markets have abandoned the notion of risk it is the Great Greek Bond Auction of April.

A little over a year ago, no one in their right mind would have even contemplated buying Greek debt. This was the country that almost tore apart the European Union. And its economy is still a basket case. An unsustainable debt burden, struggling through a recession and massive unemployment.

But this year, after four years of financial pariah status, the Greek government decided to test the waters by issuing some new debt.

The result? A mad scramble from a yield hungry investment world saw the 3 billion euro bond issue six times oversubscribed with ecstatic punters happy to accept an interest rate of just 4.95 per cent. Hey, it's better than nothing. But it is a long way short of the crisis rates of 40 per cent lenders were charging on the secondary market in February 2012.

The Greek government hailed April's events as a triumphant return, a vindication of the austerity measures and a tribute to the hard work of all Greeks.

Others were more sanguine, noting the bond issue would not have been feasible without the backing of the European Union as crisis era headlines resurfaced along the lines of: "Beware Greeks Bearing Bonds".

The global economy may be limping back. But financial markets, as they normally do, appear to be running well ahead of themselves. For now though, the central banks running the system cannot afford another cataclysmic collapse and will continue to do everything they can to avoid one.

Ian Verrender is the ABC's business editor. View his full profile here.

Topics: stockmarket, business-economics-and-finance, markets
 
Excluding war or major event, it will keep climbing. Look at what just happened with the ECB. Charging banks to store their money, to 'force' banks to lend and spur the economy. That money won't be lent to people who can't pay it back. That money has to go somewhere to get a return and my feeling is that a lot will end up in stocks plus money that central banks around the world are printing. US is winding down QE (that hasn't slowed US equities) and I wouldn't be surprised that if in the future they follow what the ECB is doing. I remember casually reading something somewhere, saying Yellen (years ago) was pro negative rates. If the Fed follows ECB that will be another boon for stocks.
A crash will come, a major one, but who knows when that will be. Some people have been calling for a crash for a long time, in the meantime stock indices have climbed and climbed. Even the PIGS have gone up big since 2013.
Keeping stocks up is part of the facade CB's/Govt build so people think all is well, they will do anything to maintain it.
 
I've reduced my stock exposure by 75% in the last couple months and I will probably keep going with exception to gold miners. I've got pre approval for another investment property right now, but am having second thoughts. I think I may hold off and see what the rest of 2014 has in store.

Nenner says:
Stock market cycle nearing end and full of fear. Nenner is already out 100% and holding cash atm.
Gold will bottom in July and be buying around then, key levels permitting.
Silver very close to cycle lows.
Crude is down as a buy.
Aussie FX cycle bottoming.
Sell orders still current on US bonds.
Possibly war coming 2015.
 
Charles Nenner is pretty good, Im don't keep track of all his predictions but he made the right call regarding PMs in mid 2013 six months or more in advance. The low in the cycle he predicted also happened when the Fed indicated it might start winding down QE, so PM's got kicked twice in the guts around the same time.
If war breaks we can always go short.
I'm cautiously optimistic long, account still in the red but only by a little bit (only have 10g's invested anyway) now as my Spain,Italy,Euro50 are up but still have losses on gold stocks (which have bumped up last couple of days). I added to current and bought new stocks mid last week and they have come up well, should've picked up more. Oh well, I don't think we are at the bottom for gold stocks so maybe better buying time in the future.
 
LovingtheSilver said:
?.....oh well, I don't think we are at the bottom for gold stocks so maybe better buying time in the future.

+1 for now. The game of cards is near the bottom for gold I believe. Miners included for that matter with a little lower to go.

was watching my preferred junior miner lose & gain nearly 10% each way in just 2days of trade. For no reason other than the release of more unlisted shares (seems the go for these friggin juniors nowadays), whilst I understand the need to raise capital, it s still money grabbing & one must be wary of this conduct. Especially if it is over & over again in as many days?? Desperation no? Can't see any other reason for this activity.

The other thing I'm wary about with th juniors at present is the acquisitions of other mines at a time where they need the cashflow & debt reduction in case of a fall in gold price.

Whilst I have heard the argument that miners are proudly acquiring others to boost egos & sure, future productivity & only doing so in anticipation of rising POG in the very near future (inside information?) but, what if their wrong? How much inside information exists in regards to POG?

I am growing very wary of miners at present. Are they a steel now or are we in for worse gold prices this year.

A bottoming in July, as mentioned is feesable but who really knows the score nowadays? What indications do you rely on towards the years end?
 
LovingtheSilver said:
Charles Nenner is pretty good, Im don't keep track of all his predictions but he made the right call regarding PMs in mid 2013 six months or more in advance. The low in the cycle he predicted also happened when the Fed indicated it might start winding down QE, so PM's got kicked twice in the guts around the same time.
If war breaks we can always go short.
I'm cautiously optimistic long, account still in the red but only by a little bit (only have 10g's invested anyway) now as my Spain,Italy,Euro50 are up but still have losses on gold stocks (which have bumped up last couple of days). I added to current and bought new stocks mid last week and they have come up well, should've picked up more. Oh well, I don't think we are at the bottom for gold stocks so maybe better buying time in the future.
Yeah Nenner is good. He also told his subscribers to sell at $1900, and has not issued a buy signal since. I like his transparency and his unique system of analysis. Being a researcher he has to disclose his investments by law. Not like those jibering idiots you see all over youtube that have some hidden agenda. It was Nenner that brought up a good point on gold relating to gold miners. That the average premium over cost of production in the 90's was only 45%, and at the moment 700-800$ production cost at 45% would be the 1100-1200$ mark for gold price to be at par with 90's production premiums. In which miners were doing business just fine.

War would probably be back for stocks in general because of the fear mainly, but war in the past has always stimulated the economy. It depends on what kind of war. An a-bomb going off in a US city would be bad all round.

In the past economic change has happened during a major war. ww1 central banks were introduced and gold standard reserve ratio was reduced from 100% to 40%. ww2 they changed the gold standard again by fixing the price at $35 per oz. Vietnam they removed the gold standard. So maybe a new war would bring economic reform.
 
After reading the initial post I can now add one more clown to my list of people who's articles I will never bother to read.
Mainstream crap is all it is.....wrong, wrong, wrong....so wrong in fact that he cannot even see that his own statement regarding the breakdown of a fundamental relationship should in fact encourage him to reassess his own understanding simply because the relationship never existed in permanence.
He is simply regurgitating other commentators, who have also proven to be wrong but you will never read about it.
He has absolutely no idea what is driving the market and could not possibly be relied upon for any future direction.
I would suggest if anyone is really interested that they dig up some of his previous articles over the years and compare them to what actually happened.
 
Back
Top