FortySeven said:
OK, it took a lot longer than that. I've been distracted with other things.
I did some investigating a few weeks ago, and I'm finally getting around to reporting it.
This is by no means a rigorous analysis, but enough to get some idea.
The quantities I used were too small for good accuracy, and I believe the main error is in the final weighing of a very small amount of material.
I started with 22 HC-49 package crystals (the most common size). Both old and new, and from both consumer and high end mainframe gear.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-1.jpg]
[/imgz]
Breaking them open takes about 20-30 seconds each.
I'm making the reasonable assumption that the silver is contained only on the internal electrical section, and none is in the can section.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-2.jpg]
[/imgz]
The gizards are weighed.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-3.jpg]
[/imgz]
Then dissolved in nitric acid.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-4.jpg]
[/imgz]
When all that's going to dissolve has done so, the solution was filtered, and the filter washed through to the filtrate to capture all the silver nitrate.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-5.jpg]
[/imgz]
Notice some gold! This is from 2 or 3 of the crystals.
The clear filtrate containing silver nitrate (and any other-stuff-nitrate).
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-6.jpg]
[/imgz]
Adding some hydrochloric acid causes the silver to precipitate out as insoluble silver chloride.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-7.jpg]
[/imgz]
Not sure what the yellow/green colour is. (Lead chloride?)
Letting the precipitates settle to the bottom.
[imgz=http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/17223_xtals-8.jpg]
[/imgz]
No more pictures...
After this, it was decanted, washed, and settled a couple of times to remove soluble compounds from the wet chloride, which was then allowed to dry. There was bugger all of it, just a scum at the bottom of the beaker. Weighing before and after washing out the residue, I get a value of about 0.05g of AgCl. (which is 75% silver by weight)
This is the biggest source of error due to the small quantity and the accuracy of the scales at that amount.
Conclusions:-
21g of crystals yielded about 0.04g of silver. (very roughly)
To get an ounce of silver, around 750 crystals would be required, and at least 5-6 hours work.
So based on that, it's not worth the trouble.
But, there is considerable room for error in all the above. I could be out by a factor of 2 or more, but I seriously doubt that it could be much higher than about 4.
In the very unlikely case of being out by a factor of 10, that's still 75 crystals and an hours work for an ounce of silver...
However, the error is more probably in the other direction - due to more than just silver chloride being in the residue.
To be really sure, a much larger quantity would need to be processed, but I'm convinced it would still prove non-viable.
(unless silver goes to the moon, or lots of crystals with gold can be found)
FYI...