Someone may not like this fact but animals are the most popular....

pdkbffwleo said:
Stark said:
pdkbffwleo said:
I just meant, generally, these coins..with the animals. I've got 180 Kook's and 200 Buffalo's and another 50 Maple Leafs (thankfully, not another animal).

I case you haven't seen it in another post:
http://www.lencia.si/wallimages/12100244.png
^^

:)

There are also Mexican Libertads. Also with "naked" women. :)

I want them!

You can get them now cheaper that was initial price. But if she somehow manages to repeat amazing season as was last one or get one of few great achievements she is missing the price would go up. She was very close to getting all 4 all 5 small cups/globes.:)
 
xrayspecs said:
Jcoin said:
More T&A on coins needs to happen. Actually... the more I think about it, the better the idea sounds.
Someone get this done.

You realise you're on the internet, right? You're just a search away from more smut that you could possibly handle. Why would you need it plastered on coins?

Because I'd rather hold and look at a shiny coin with a beautiful woman than a stupid fu#$ing squirrel.
 
pdkbffwleo said:
soooo sick of the animals. how about some playboy centerfolds, or models....or girl's next door...something I'd actually want to look at besides a snake or a stupid panda.

how about the Libertads..

Im with you a model on a coin would be cool. I bought a 1oz Silver Bar with "Ms September" a naked chick on the bar for $26 US shipped. I sold the Bar for $120+ shipping.

This is an example of demand for naked chicks on bars, rounds, or coins.

However I like the Pandas and quite a few of the other animal coins so I can't complain myself.
 
More scantily clad or naked women in sexually provocative and exploitive poses on a bunch of coins sold by major mints will have the likely effect of driving away perhaps many women and not to mention some men....not enough to offset the arguably slight increase in sales by those few men who would want it.

That said, I'm all for freedom of private mints to produce coins with beautiful women so long as the message sent isn't that women ought to be objectified.

It's probably to our own benefit that women aren't driven away from buying silver and gold coins as they are increasingly a growing segment of pm buyers (at least from what I am seeing here in the US).


.
 
Oh please. I'm not talking about a sexually provocative woman doing acts of porn. I'm talking about a woman with a smile...Ms. America or Ms. Universe...or, at the very least, a "woman's movement" series that includes brilliant women and their accomplishments. I'm not looking for porn here, or something that would drive women away. lol. that's just stupid.

Most women I know, appreciate a woman's body. It's not sexual...but, it can be classy and still have an affect that makes it desirable for collectors, men and women.

Women are objectified every single day, as are men. It sells, and always will.
 
pdkbffwleo said:
Oh please. I'm not talking about a sexually provocative woman doing acts of porn. I'm talking about a woman with a smile...Ms. America or Ms. Universe...or, at the very least, a "woman's movement" series that includes brilliant women and their accomplishments. I'm not looking for porn here, or something that would drive women away. lol. that's just stupid.

Most women I know, appreciate a woman's body. It's not sexual...but, it can be classy and still have an affect that makes it desirable for collectors, men and women.

Women are objectified every single day, as are men. It sells, and always will.





You are such a liar. You'd written that you wanted more coins depicting "some playboy centerfolds, or models". It was also you I believe, before you edited it out of your post, who wanted to see more T&A (Tits and Ass).

So stop the nonsense.

In your latest comments, I actually think some of the suggestions are very good - like vibrant women and their accomplishments. I think this would have considerably wider appeal (especially with women) than coins with naked tits and ass displayed naked or scantily clad Playboy models.

My main point is that smut on coins by major mints may actually have the effect of driving business away. I don't have a problem with Libertads...to me that isn't promoting a negative connotation of women as might but nekked Playboy models.



.
 
What are you talking about? Dude...calm down on the internet.

Porn is completely different than T&A. Playboy centerfolds and models does not imply porn.

Are you ok?

Also, if I edited anything, it wasn't that.

Your point was stupid. I called you on it. Now, you're calling me a liar.

You gotta love guys on the internet...all big and stuff.

P.S. Here's an "edit" for you. The only thing I "edited" on his initial posting was the word "Fuc$ing" because it came up as something completely different.

Try again. Another poster mentioned T&A.

Sooooo....porn is the same as nudity, or partial nudity. Got it. :rolleyes:
 
pdkbffwleo said:
Oh please. I'm not talking about a sexually provocative woman doing acts of porn. I'm talking about a woman with a smile...Ms. America or Ms. Universe...or, at the very least, a "woman's movement" series that includes brilliant women and their accomplishments. I'm not looking for porn here, or something that would drive women away. lol. that's just stupid.

Most women I know, appreciate a woman's body. It's not sexual...but, it can be classy and still have an affect that makes it desirable for collectors, men and women.

Women are objectified every single day, as are men. It sells, and always will.

I stand by everything I said...as do most people.

Keep buying the squirrels and lions, I'll buy a classy coin that shows off something remarkable about a woman.
 
@ pdkbffwleo,

You are indeed carrying on in this thread like a compulsive liar, making things up just to fit your narrative. I NEVER used the word "porn" to describe naked, sexually posed females (T&A). I did use the word "smut" which means "Sexual fiction, art etc" ( http://www.internetslang.com/SMUT-meaning-definition.asp ) which is precisely what scantily clad or naked females in sexually provocative positions (T&A) is in the real world.

Stop with your nonsense already...you have already discredited yourself enough here.


.
 
mmissinglink said:
@ pdkbffwleo,

You are indeed carrying on in this thread like a compulsive liar, making things up just to fit your narrative. I NEVER used the word "porn" to describe naked, sexually posed females (T&A). I did use the word "smut" which means "Sexual fiction, art etc" ( http://www.internetslang.com/SMUT-meaning-definition.asp ) which is precisely what scantily clad or naked females in sexually provocative positions (T&A) is in the real world.

Stop with your nonsense already...you have already discredited yourself enough here.


.

Lol
 
mmissinglink said:
That said, I'm all for freedom of private mints to produce coins with beautiful women so long as the message sent isn't that women ought to be objectified.

Even when tightly wrapped in the Sacred Shroud of Sanctimonious Righteous Intentions, censorship is still
censorship and many (such as those who wrote the US Constitution and Bill of Rights) find it unacceptable.

That being said, I have only one other thing to say: CROWN MINT BEAUTIES* FOREVER!!!

* For anybody not familiar with the 1980's Crown Mint series of 1oz silver art bars--search the name in sleazeBay.
 
Someone has already done the cheap T&A thing:

http://koinpro.tripod.com/BarsMedalsRounds/DicksW600px.jpg

There are others (You'll have to Google the images yourself, I couldn't be bothered):

Baseball Beauties / Put It Here (Nude Girl playing catcher) 1oz silver round.
Football Beauties / Tight Ends (Partially Girl playing football) silver-clad round.
Remember Your First Soft-Tail (Nude Girl Straddling front of motorcycle) 1oz silver round.
Hot To Trot / Mustang Ranch (Nude Girl in cowboy hat in front of corralled mustangs) 1oz silver round.
Year of the Horse...Mustang Ranch...
 
Back
Top