Yippe-Ki-Ya
New Member
Bargain Hunter said:Silversurfer its much easier to invest millions of dollars than it is to invest billions of dollars. If Warren Buffett only had to invest $5 million or $10 million dollars over the past 10 years he would have annihilated Mike Maloney's track record (probably by investing in massively undervalued small caps) I'm absolutely sure of that. In fact Buffett once stated some years ago that if he only had $1 million to invest he could produce an average return of 50% per annum. I believe him.
While on the topic of Warren Buffett ...
The famous "value investor" has said he doesn't understand gold, because it has "no utility". Never mind its 5,000-year history of storing wealth. Anyone watching the gold market from Mars "would be scratching their head" to see it "dug up in Africa" only to be buried again in a vault underground, says Buffett.
Yet his Berkshire Hathaway fund tried to corner the silver market in the late 1990s, selling its massive position in 2006 for a fair profit. So while Buffett doesn't "get" gold, his Graham-and-Dodd value investing made silver a valid play. Because he thought it was undervalued against the outlook for industrial demand.
Gold analysts are spared having to guess how technology might affect prices. Whereas the bigger prize for you, Warren Buffett and for the Hunt brothers, who famously attempted a silver corner in the late 1970s may look to be in judging silver's future mix of monetary, investment and industrial use.
courtesy Money Morning