Silver Lake Resources (SLR)
- Thread starter Greenman
- Start date
SilverSanchez
Active Member
SilverSanchez said:
*cough*
SilverSanchez
Active Member
Yeah - but wish some support came in to hold it, i didnt sell into it, because i wanted 0.25. Oh welldollars said:
MyNamesNotBen
New Member
Capital raising? Really? F*ck this for a joke. 
SilverSanchez
Active Member
Its annoying, really annoying
I was going to take profits today
I was going to take profits today
MyNamesNotBen
New Member
Theres no way this could possibly be a good move for SLR. Seriously.. Going to the market to raise capital when the share price is at its lowest point in years? Just how incompetent is management? And not just raising a little bit either.. $50million! They are going to have to offer shares lower than their current price so expect placement to be at around 85c. Thats what, like 70million new shares issued? Wtf! All this to pay off debt that is quite manageable AND while the share price is finally recovering. Anyone here read the investors presentation? 50 pages of mindless drivel and 6 pages of actual info. I have seen better power points made by 12 year olds. So they are issuing more shares while the resource is not growing (actually declining) and ceasing expansion and exploration (well not completely, there will be a measly $7million spent on exploration in FY14).
SLR is currently operating for a AUD gold price of $1350/oz. From the investors presentation:
Current budget A$1350 gold price environment:
-deferral of capital expenditure
-deferral of organic expansion projects
-treating stockpiles to reduce spend in ground
-modest and prudent exploration spend, however maintaining a sensible exploration program (what a load of bullshit)
^this made sense earlier this year with gold rapidly declining and not showing any signs of stopping; but now with gold above $1500 AUD it kinda makes no sense.
Improved and sustained gold price environment:
-Commence production from Wombola Dam with minimal lead time
-develop Majectic and Imperial deposits
-recommence underground development in the Murchison to compliment existing open pit operations
-Enhance exploration efforts:
-Lorna Doone
-Raldalls BIF
-Great southern
How many more weeks of gold going up will it take before SLR directors consider changing operations to "Improved and sustained gold price environment"?. No clue, not a mention in the 56 page presentation.
SLR now aiming for annual production of 200,000 ounces per annum. That made sense in April but not any more with gold prices recovering why not go back to last years goal of 400,000 ounces per annum and dividend in 2014, at least for now. If gold starts going down again THEN change back to "Current budget A$1350 gold price environment". With the gold price as skitzo as it is SLR needs to be more flexible, eg producing 100,000 ounces per quarter at times like now then times like last quarter dropping production to like 50,000 ounces. But no that would make too much sense for these mentally incompetent directors.
Not happy
SLR is currently operating for a AUD gold price of $1350/oz. From the investors presentation:
Current budget A$1350 gold price environment:
-deferral of capital expenditure
-deferral of organic expansion projects
-treating stockpiles to reduce spend in ground
-modest and prudent exploration spend, however maintaining a sensible exploration program (what a load of bullshit)
^this made sense earlier this year with gold rapidly declining and not showing any signs of stopping; but now with gold above $1500 AUD it kinda makes no sense.
Improved and sustained gold price environment:
-Commence production from Wombola Dam with minimal lead time
-develop Majectic and Imperial deposits
-recommence underground development in the Murchison to compliment existing open pit operations
-Enhance exploration efforts:
-Lorna Doone
-Raldalls BIF
-Great southern
How many more weeks of gold going up will it take before SLR directors consider changing operations to "Improved and sustained gold price environment"?. No clue, not a mention in the 56 page presentation.
SLR now aiming for annual production of 200,000 ounces per annum. That made sense in April but not any more with gold prices recovering why not go back to last years goal of 400,000 ounces per annum and dividend in 2014, at least for now. If gold starts going down again THEN change back to "Current budget A$1350 gold price environment". With the gold price as skitzo as it is SLR needs to be more flexible, eg producing 100,000 ounces per quarter at times like now then times like last quarter dropping production to like 50,000 ounces. But no that would make too much sense for these mentally incompetent directors.
Not happy
MyNamesNotBen
New Member
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkmN75krOBk[/youtube]
MyNamesNotBen
New Member
Greenman said:
Yep and quite rational considering the directors basically just gave a big F*CK YOU to all existing share holders.
MyNamesNotBen
New Member
finicky said:Butbut notBen, it might mean I'll be able to buy cheaper
Investors like companies that don't have any debt issues.
Thats true but SLR's debt wasn't (isn't) an issue. They are producing a profit and are capable of producing a profit with lower gold prices so I really can't see where the sudden need to pay off debt has come from. Especially at the shareholders expense. Waiting for the share price to go higher ($1.40+) obviously would have been much better IMO. Just like that they have screwed SLR's share price recovery. I can see why having no debt is a good thing especially with the uncertainty around gold prices but diluting shares like this is the wrong way to go about it.
Are you actually going to buy SLR? May I ask why you have chosen SLR over others like NST?
MyNamesNotBen said:
SLR in on my list but I am definitely not going to get very involved with gold stocks again. I shouldn't be buying any. Here we have this upsurge in interest just because the share prices are going up. I didn't want SLR at 60c, or SAR at 10c, so why now. The only reason I would buy SLR over NST or DRM is to spread my risk, or if looks relatively cheaper. The chart impressions would also influence me as to which seems best chance to appreciate quickly and let me sell down some to lower my average.
SilverSanchez
Active Member
Fully underwritten SPP and Placement @0.85, scallable if too many applied for (which means not an unrenouncable rights issue which sucks because if you hold a minimum of shares you have the same oppertunity to buy maximum)
I think this is a good move by the comany for these reasons
1. It puts a level of support above the nearest chart level of support
2. If the share price falls below the SPP price its fully underwritten
3. Pay off debts
I think it is bad for these reasons
1. Dilution
2. Sentiment still low
3. Market didnt expect the company to need money
4. Ivestors may have overweighted the undervalued stock and may be 'saturated' in their possition already looking to take profits, not buy more in a SPP. Explains why its not a nonrenouncable rights issue
I think this is a good move by the comany for these reasons
1. It puts a level of support above the nearest chart level of support
2. If the share price falls below the SPP price its fully underwritten
3. Pay off debts
I think it is bad for these reasons
1. Dilution
2. Sentiment still low
3. Market didnt expect the company to need money
4. Ivestors may have overweighted the undervalued stock and may be 'saturated' in their possition already looking to take profits, not buy more in a SPP. Explains why its not a nonrenouncable rights issue
ashleyd123
Member
I made a tidy sum some time ago with SLR shares, the thing that got me into them was that the directors were a mix of some of the wealthiest people in the Kalgoorlie mining scene. Exactly why I got out of them as well, seems like they're lining their pockets again, $1.2m this time.....pity the shareholder.