IMO it is obvious that Russia has the upper hand. They have tanks on the streets, NATO have diddly squat and it is questionable that they would want to roll them in. There's no way the EU would want an open confrontation else freeze next winter. The US government may be a little more bellicose. I doubt they would want direct confrontation though, more likely an economic response will be the focus - unfortunately it may take a global recession to do it.
I don't see Russia rolling over or rolling out in a hurry. The NATO response to the Georgian conflict six years ago was telling. Putin may have weaknesses but he is no fool.
Will be interesting to see how the Ukraine elections in May pan out. The splintering between east and west is fairly obvious. It may be that Russia will be happy 'claiming' eastern parts of Ukraine and leaving the rest to Europe. Crimea is strategically important and the east (Donetsk, etc.) is fertile in cropping and mining. That would be a win but they may not be satisfied.
This is a carve of Europe. It's happened before, for example with Poland between Germany/USSR some 75 years ago. I also see this is as another legacy from Soviet border-drawing designed to mix and weaken ethnic groups.
I don't see Russia rolling over or rolling out in a hurry. The NATO response to the Georgian conflict six years ago was telling. Putin may have weaknesses but he is no fool.
Will be interesting to see how the Ukraine elections in May pan out. The splintering between east and west is fairly obvious. It may be that Russia will be happy 'claiming' eastern parts of Ukraine and leaving the rest to Europe. Crimea is strategically important and the east (Donetsk, etc.) is fertile in cropping and mining. That would be a win but they may not be satisfied.
This is a carve of Europe. It's happened before, for example with Poland between Germany/USSR some 75 years ago. I also see this is as another legacy from Soviet border-drawing designed to mix and weaken ethnic groups.