He seems like a patent troll.
I wouldn't touch any project throwing money at frivolous lawsuits like this.
Patents typically only protect a very specific invention. You can't patent "DeFi" as if it's just one thing, because it's not. It would be like trying to patent "the internet".
Hope you don't pour too much money on this dumpster fire SULLA, his patents are likely to amount to nothing and have very little impact on the crypto space.
Thanks BB.
time will tell if you are correct or RM is correct.
as for you cannot patent “DeFi”, the US Patent Office and Japanese Patent Office do not agree with you. The US patent was applied for in 2014 and granted in late 2021. The Japanese patent follows a similar timeline. So it took 7 years of litigation for the respective patent offices to approve. I would think they would be extremely meticulous before granting any patent.
RM’s patents in US and Japan also cover trustless P2P transactions, NFTs, stablecoins, CBDCs and cold storage.
Patent Offices do not grant patents frivolously!
As for being a “frivolous lawsuit” again time will tell, but I do not agree that the lawsuits are frivolous and I suspect the Judges in each case do not agree with you either.
What is most interesting is that Coinbase cited one of RM patents in 2021, in a patent application they made!
Two cases are now active Coinbase and Circle.
More coming soon.
And a second Japanese Patent Has just been confirmed.
As for using the term “patent troll” for RM, I strongly recommend that you DYOR.
Not only on his patents and what they are specifically designed to do, but also DYOR on RM the man and his track record in the US financial arena.
Can you name anyone who was working on using the blockchain for DeFi, and Trustless P2P transactions, etc in 2014?
I can.
EDIT:
that video in Leo25’s post is a good starting point.
This video was released less than an hour ago.