mmissinglink
Active Member
So, I've been stacking for about 22 months. I've learned a lot but there's a lot more to learn.
I think the question I have that follows is more for long time stackers than it it is for new stackers but all may be interested in the answers anyway.
When I first started my very modest (okay, small) stacking endeavor in the Fall of 2012, I read about the advantages of stacking junk silver and modern raw silver bullion coins like the ASE. I bought some of each and never actually bothered to look at the quality of those products. Shortly after this time I started becoming aware of semi-numi (collector) coins and even graded coins. So I bought some modern semi-numis and some modern graded coins. I've always personally distinguished junk and raw (meaning to me, not graded) bullion coins from semi-numis (even separating them in my SDB) because the way I see it, the primary reason why I would buy junk and raw, ungraded bullion is different from why I'd buy collector (semi-numi) coins. Clearly, mints which produce both types of coins use a different manufacturing standard for bullion vs collector coins, almost always from what I understand. That's why the premiums on collector coins can and often are higher than on bullion coins....it costs the mint more to quality control produce collector coins over bullion.
So, when over these past 15-20 or so months in reading discussions on forums like this where I noticed that some stackers appear to be very concerned about the quality of the bullion coins they are buying, it makes me wonder why there is so much fuss over a piece of bullion which is ostensibly made not for collectors, but for investors / stackers. I can understand a big fuss made about collector coins, but raw bullion....really? What am I missing?
For the long-timers:
Has it always been like this?
Is this a recent trend in the stacker community?
Has this been brought on by the popularity of TGP graded coins?
What is your take on making a fuss about bullion coins?
.
I think the question I have that follows is more for long time stackers than it it is for new stackers but all may be interested in the answers anyway.
When I first started my very modest (okay, small) stacking endeavor in the Fall of 2012, I read about the advantages of stacking junk silver and modern raw silver bullion coins like the ASE. I bought some of each and never actually bothered to look at the quality of those products. Shortly after this time I started becoming aware of semi-numi (collector) coins and even graded coins. So I bought some modern semi-numis and some modern graded coins. I've always personally distinguished junk and raw (meaning to me, not graded) bullion coins from semi-numis (even separating them in my SDB) because the way I see it, the primary reason why I would buy junk and raw, ungraded bullion is different from why I'd buy collector (semi-numi) coins. Clearly, mints which produce both types of coins use a different manufacturing standard for bullion vs collector coins, almost always from what I understand. That's why the premiums on collector coins can and often are higher than on bullion coins....it costs the mint more to quality control produce collector coins over bullion.
So, when over these past 15-20 or so months in reading discussions on forums like this where I noticed that some stackers appear to be very concerned about the quality of the bullion coins they are buying, it makes me wonder why there is so much fuss over a piece of bullion which is ostensibly made not for collectors, but for investors / stackers. I can understand a big fuss made about collector coins, but raw bullion....really? What am I missing?
For the long-timers:
Has it always been like this?
Is this a recent trend in the stacker community?
Has this been brought on by the popularity of TGP graded coins?
What is your take on making a fuss about bullion coins?
.