President Paul

Ron Paul: "I Don't Fully Endorse Romney For President"
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/ron-paul-i-dont-fully-endorse-romney-president
On the 'new' eve of the Republican Convention, it appears all is not well in the Romney-Ryan ranks. In what is quite a stunning admission, though not entirely surprising given his outspoken desire for a change to the status quo, the NY Times is reporting that Ron Paul does not fully endorse Romney for President. Mr. Paul, said convention planners had offered him an opportunity to speak under two conditions: that he deliver remarks vetted by the Romney campaign, and that he give a full-fledged endorsement of Mr. Romney. He declined. "It wouldn't be my speech," Mr. Paul said. "That would undo everything I've done in the last 30 years. I don't fully endorse him for president." Whether this is Paul playing an admirable 'long-game' and/or standing by his libertarian roots (or angry at his apparent marginalization) is unclear but one thing is for sure; with the dominance of 'young' voters (seeking 'change'?) behind Ron Paul relative to 'old' voters with Romney, this rebuff will not help in the fight against TOTUS. As BigStory reports, Paul is telling his supporters to stand firm because "we will become the tent eventually!"
The Man giving the finger to the man... if we get lucky the hurricane will squish Romney and it will be Paul Vs. Obamney... opps I mean Obuma
 
As BigStory reports, Paul is telling his supporters to stand firm because "we will become the tent eventually!"

That's the point. Why compromise for short-term gain? Paul doesn't really want to be President, I believe. I don't know what sane, rational person would.

What he wants is to change the world. He wants it to emerge from the dark age that was the 20th century, the century of governments, to a more reasoned, rational, ethical, enlightened and more pleasant age.

This is the second renaissance and he is going to be seen as one of the major figures.
 
hawkeye said:
As BigStory reports, Paul is telling his supporters to stand firm because "we will become the tent eventually!"

That's the point. Why compromise for short-term gain? Paul doesn't really want to be President, I believe. I don't know what sane, rational person would.

What he wants is to change the world. He wants it to emerge from the dark age that was the 20th century, the century of governments, to a more reasoned, rational, ethical, enlightened and more pleasant age.

This is the second renaissance and he is going to be seen as one of the major figures.

It may take another generation though, however it will be worth it for our children and their children
 
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/ron-paul-recants-gop-just-says-no-keynesians

As we anticipate more demand-rigging, pump-priming, can-kicking experiments from Bernanke today, Ron Paul just came out with his latest stream of truthiness (via Bloomberg):

*REP. PAUL SAYS BOTH PARTIES KEYNESIANS, GOP 'NOT HIS
PARTY'
*REP. PAUL SAYS FED PRICE FIXING
*REP. PAUL SAYS FED FLOODING MARKET WITH MONEY

Indeed, what is the opposite of 'between a rock and a hard place' when deciding on just who will provide 'change' in November.
3rd party run?
 
Back
Top