100%
Maybe. :/ 
wrcmad said:
Greg Williams said:
gooby said:I agree with Greg - 0%.
Argentum said:Well done wrcmad
Last one for tonight:
You're a bank manager in a SHTF crisis and your bank has 1000 safety deposit boxes filled with gold. Since fiat is now irrelevant you dont worry about all the stacks of dollars euros and pounds that are stacked in the vault. You do know that one of the deposit boxes has gold/silver bullion in it and rest are tungsten bars at the core but that deposit box with real gold is fitted with a dispenser of some kind of biological/chemical agent that will kill you over a period between 12-24 hrs without any symptoms in the mean time. The dispenser is so small that noone really notices it when searching for it.
You dont have access to any protection equipment or any technolgy that distinguishes gold from tungsten however you do have access to a large group of employees that work for you. These can be used to check the contents of the boxes. Now bear in mind that time is of the essence and that you want least amount of people to die for your cause.
The only way to know which box contains real gold is the one where the person dies from opening it. Whats the minimum number of employees you will need to die for you to find the real gold.
So explain how many employees you will need and how many will die and your strategy
wrcmad said:I find the following puzzle fantastic, and tends to highlight deeply rooted "intuitive assumptions/beliefs" that are instinctive in humans, and that often trip us up - especially in things like trading or investing:
Suppose you're on a game show, and you're given the choice of three boxes:
Inside one box is a 10oz gold bar;
Inside the others, a 1oz silver coin.
You pick a box, say No. 1, and the host, who knows what's inside each box, opens another box, say No. 3, which contains a 1oz silver coin.
He then says to you, "Do you want to pick box No. 2?"
Is it to your advantage to switch your choice?
wrcmad said: