RicHARD said:
Ronnie 666 said:
People who can afford health insurance but choose not to, relying on the public system to provide should not be on the SS site.
What the??? Is insurance not a "banking product".....
Forget the health insurance. Insurance is really the a classic fiat banking product isn't it. a kind of "we promise to help pay" if there is absolutely no possibility of getting out of it, just as long as too many problems don't occur at the same time, because we can't afford to pay for you all.
People who pay tax towards the public system have a right to respectable health care relative to the tax dollars I have paid. As soon as the government allows me to "opt out" I will happily take responsibility for my own healthcare funding. In the meantime I feel like paying premium to big insurance companies is just another form of investing in the fiat system. Have seen first hand here in NZ this past year one big insurer AMI have to be bailed out after they didn't have the funds to pay out their responsibilities on Christchurch Earthquake damage.
Putting money into an insurance company is taking a gamble that the company will be around when I need them, that the government will be in a position to bail them out if claims exceed their bank balance. All based on a fiat dollar that is losing value every day.
Putting this investment in PM's instead is a no brainier to me.
1. So what if it's a banking product, just because it's a banking product doesn't mean it's bad. Not everything related to banking is bad, only those with tinfoil pulled over their head so hard that it's melded with their brains thinks everything is bad.
2. Yeah we pay tax towards a public health system, and guess what, it's not respectable. How do we hedge this risk? We pay a private health company so that when my left nut sack gets sawn off in a hedge trimming accident I can get my kids reattached without having to wait in line.
3. So what if they got bailed out? It means they got money from the government to pay for the $700k that just got flattened. The insurance policy holders still win. Let's weigh up the situations that could have happened:
- You pay a few hundred bucks a year for insurance for your home, it gets flattened, you get $700k back.
- You don't pay for insurance and oh snap, you just lost 700k.
4. So what if those Big Mac binges caught up to you and you needed a triple bypass which costs skywards of $120k? Let's weigh up the situations that could unfold:
- You pay a few hundred bucks a year for insurance for your health, you get flattened, you get surgery and you live.
- You don't pay for insurance and oh snap you just lost your home to pay for your surgery.
BBQ, if you are baller enough to have a couple of hundred K just sitting around, and don't mind losing it because of natural disasters, then good on ya mate.
5. Fiat money has nothing to do with insurance, I don't even know how you managed to mix and shake that together.