TomD I'll usually have 5+ lights, 1 or more at a very flat angle and then look at the coin from the camera angle while moving it around looking for the shot I want. The lights don't cost much, they're just $10 clamp ons with $5 5500K CFL bulbs. It takes several lights working together to make the light and shadow.
The absolutely hardest to get good results with are the ones with smooth reflective subjects.
I had no idea you cold get 5500k bulbs for that price.
I have been out of the loop for a while.
Supplier?
The Pandas are basically mirrors with designs. Glassware and shiny metals are the most challenging.
I didn't get to look up any of your Bios - at this point I take you to be a specialist photographer (coins). Most professional photographers wouldn't take the time to reach your level of excellence, no money in it. It is very easy for a studio photographer to do a very good, even great job with things like coins, but seriously, you have taken it to another level. Ten of ten.
The coins show your technical expertise, and the backgrounds show your artistic eye.
I noticed on at least some of your photos you are using the black reflection for mirrored finishes. I'm guessing that is the best that can be done, as I see no googled images any better. It is a little disappointing, does not compare to the actual coin (looking at 1981 Queen Canadian silver dollar). That is the way photography is, some thing look better than real life, some not as good.
My goal is to see what can be done with a simple digital camera, like the ipad.
A tripod is the most undervalued piece of photography equipment, but no tripod for an ipad, or the kind of digital camera most stackers would already have.
This means no front shooting (camera viewpoint) into the light box. This should not be a major problem.
~ ~
Briefly about myself:
First university class in photography in 1969, as an Education major, not art or photography.
University newspaper and yearbook photographer until 1972 when I went into the Navy as a photographer.
We were doing most of our work with 4x5 Speed Graphics at that time, but also used Leicas, Nikons, 120 format, and even 8x10 view cameras from time to time.
Quite a eye opener for a hot shot college kid that thought he know a lot about photography.
With my wife's blessing I opened a studio in the 80's. Like in the Navy, I did a little of everything, portraits and wedding primarily - unlike the Navy.
I loved doing high school seniors, hated weddings.
The studio was too much time, no benefits, and the hand writing was on the wall for digital. I was having digital retouching done on negs, but needed to get out of film completely, big investment.
I had a full line of Canon bodies and lenses, but did most of my studio work with a Pentax 6x7.
Horseman 6x7 my all time favorite camera. Handles like a Speed Graphic, but with swings and tilts like a view. Lots of different backs for roll film and sheet film, probably digital backs today. The glass is tack sharp, every bit as good as Hasselblad, and a friendlier format.
I have no idea of your ambition, but the only way your images could improve with be with a view camera. Another whole ball game, but it could add another layer to the three dimensional quality you are so good at. I was never very good with a view camera. I doubt that you would want to invest the money and time to go there, but if you have a burning desire.......
I have bought and sold complete 35mm systems twice, and medium format three times.
I only have point and shoot today.
My intentions were to explore the capabilities of the ipad as an outlet.
If I start building a digital system, it will be because of seeing your work.
Thank you.