Pfizer Insiders Tell the Truth

Interesting. I wonder why the WA Public Health Act states "Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Poison" instead of "Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Medicine". Is it a poor choice of words, or something more?

Probably because the Fed legislation is referred to as The Poisons Stabdard.

  • The Poisons Standard (the SUSMP)
    The Poisons Standard consists of decisions regarding the classification of drugs and poisons into Schedules for inclusion in the relevant legislation of the States and Territories

https://www.tga.gov.au/scheduling-medicines-poisons
 
Interesting. I wonder why the WA Public Health Act states "Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Poison" instead of "Authorisation to Supply or Administer a Medicine". Is it a poor choice of words, or something more?
they put skull and bone picture for deadly poison, its all about treatment, not cure, medicine is more for cure. all the standard had been changed, doctors are very good at drugs treatments, unlike it used to be.
 
I was looking into this a while back when I first found that WA legislative document for administering a poison. The one I saw was for the defence force to have the ability to administer a poison. The reason they call it a poison (IMO) is because it could cause harm or death.

"In biology, poisons are substances that can cause death, injury or harm to organs, tissues, cells, and DNA usually by chemical reactions..."

I haven't looked at the legislation in whole, but I could understand how such legislation would be necessary to indemnify those administering injections, especially when the defence force is brought in to do so in a "national emergency".

As everyone would already know, the term "choose your poison" isn't to be taken literally. Hell, I used it when presenting multiple service options to a client recently. It was definitely poorly chosen terminology given the nature of this current experiment.
 
^^ they'll be running out of unvaccinated people to test their hypothesis. It would be unscientific to declare it's from Covid unless the study included the unvaccinated and the results were compared to vaccinated individuals.

A more likely conclusion could be the vaccine is messing with insulin-producing cells.
If the suspicions regarding the spike protein are true, it would be quite easy to confirm if build up of spike protein is causing pancreatic inflammation and thus death of insulin producing cells.
 
3GDu98a.jpg
 
^
Phase 1: Simulate a threat and create fear. (December 2019-March 2020)

Mount a pandemic in China.
> – Kill tens of thousands of elderly people.
> – Increase the number of cases and deaths
> – Position vaccination as the only solution from the beginning.
> – Focus all attention on Covid-19.
> Result, (almost) general panic

Phase 4: Install Apartheid and the QR code. (June 2021-October 2021)
> – Voluntarily plan for shortages.

Phase 5: Establish chaos and Martial law. (November 2021-March 2022)
> – Exploit the shortage of goods and food.
> – Cause the paralysis of the real economy and the closure of factories and shops.
> – Let unemployment explode.
> – Apply a third dose to the vaxx (boosters).

Phase 6: Cancel the debts and dematerialize the money. (March 2022-September 2022)
> – Trigger the economic, financial and stock market collapse, the bankruptcy of the banks.
> – To rescue the losses of the banks in the accounts of their clients.
> – Activate the «Great Reset».
> – De-materialize money.
> – Cancel debts, loans and loans.
> – Impose the digital portfolio. (Digital Wallet)
> – Seize properties and land.
> – Ban all global medicines.
> – Confirm the obligation to vaccinate semi-annually or annually.
> – Impose food rationing and a diet based on the Codex Alimentarius.
> – Extend the measures to emerging countries.
> Result, Third stage of digital control. Extension of the N.O.M. to the whole planet.
 
Back
Top