There's three we know of, out of about 25 people on the forum.....Crazy to think that someone with an SDB is waiting for it all to blow over instead of knock on Perth bullions door daily until they get their stuff back.
Can tell you I would definitely be kicking down doors if I had stock there, waiver or no waiver.
What an absolute rort regards that 3300 fee and what sort of a shit hole do we live in where court documents regarding insolvency can be redacted. A sad indictment on Australian courts indeed!!
I would presume those three have sought legal advice which would undoubtedly include advice not to discuss their situation online due to the chances of it all ending up in court.There's three we know of, out of about 25 people on the forum.....
How many more are out there??
I imagine that the 3 SDB holders who have not come forward may well be not be able to prove their false identity! Maybe too clever by half.
I hope you are right Sammy, but also don't think it is prudent to rely on hopeI imagine that the 3 SDB holders who have not come forward may well be not be able to prove their false identity! Maybe too clever by half.
1stly - the safety deposit box holders OWN property was stored there - it was NEVER the company's assets - this was a completely separate side of the company unrelated to the retail side that the GST was applied to - so you've got it ass backwards - why should 3rd party asset holders pay for the liquidator to deal with other people's GST debts? Answer that and stay fashionable! 2ndly - all the pain was completely unnecessary - brought on by the ATO arbitrarily slapping an ambiguous interpretation of GST rules that purportedly were never applied before to this company OR to any other bullion retailer. All for what? - absolutely NOTHING positive has been gained by anyone here - not even the effing ATO who ignited it all - as there wont be anything left to get their GST from. Just mindless destructive bureaucrats!Sham, an organised front wouldn't have changed a thing. It is absolutely reasonable that sdb holders pay to access their metals. If you think about it, why should creditors of the company pay for the liquidator to deal with other people's assets? Or should the liquidator work for free?
In any case, I don't think the Court would have ruled in any other way, even if 450 sdb holders made an appearance at the hearing.
Now regarding the increased cost for large sdb holders, I'm not sure what that is about. Haven't read the request for directions.
I just want to get people to see it from all sides before screaming how unfair everything is. It's a company liquidation. A lot of pain to go around...
P.S. No affiliation with Perth Bullion or the liquidator, just familiar with the insolvency industry.
Tax legislation gives them authority. They are the Australian IRS that collect GST from all goods and service providers, registered or not.who gives the ATO the authority to claim GST when bullion dealers does not need license to operate ???
They're not claiming GST on the stored property, they claim that Perth Bullion didn't appropriately collect GST from their precious metal sales and owe the Government $$$$$. This caused PB to go into liquidation, and thus everyone's stored assets in PB vaults are in the hands of the liquidators who seem keen on rorting the owners. $350 was an acceptable if not high fee. $3300 is highway robbery and should be met with all possible resistance.but gold and silver are my property, they are not goods or services