Only 3 countries left without a Rothschilds controlled central bank...

Revolutionary

Revolutionary

Member
The Rothschild family is slowly but surely having their Central banks established in every country of this world, giving them incredible amount of wealth and power.




In the year of 2000 there were seven countries without a Rothschild owned Central Bank:

Afghanistan
Iraq
Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran

It is not a coincidence that these countrys, which are listed above were and are still being under attack by the western media, since one of the main reasons these countries have been under attack in the first place is because they do not have a Rothschild owned Central Bank yet. The first step in having a Central Bank establish in a country is to get them to accept an outrageous loans, which puts the country in debt of the Central Bank and under the control of the Rothschilds. If the country does not accept the loan, the leader of this particular country will be assassinated and a Rothschild aligned leader will be put into the position, and if the assassination does not work, the country will be invaded and have a Central Bank established with force all under the name of terrorism.




Rothschild owned Central Bank:

Central banks are illegally created private banks that are owned by the Rothschild banking family. The family has been around for more than 230 years and has slithered its way into each country on this planet, threatened every world leader and their governments and cabinets with physical and economic death and destruction, and then emplaced their own people in these central banks to control and manage each country's pocketbook. Worse, the Rothschilds also control the machinations of each government at the macro level, not concerning themselves with the daily vicissitudes of our individual personal lives. Except when we get too far out of line.



The only countries left in 2003 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family were:

Sudan
Libya
Cuba
North Korea
Iran


The only countries left in 2011 without a Central Bank owned by the Rothschild Family are:

Cuba
North Korea
Iran

After the instigated protests and riots in the Arab countries the Rothschild finally paved their way into establishing Central Banks, and getting rid of many leaders, which put them into more power.
 
I read this article a while back or something similar, but what about the RBA? i'm not so sure that is privately owned but would love to be proven wrong.
 
http://www.rba.gov.au/qa/role.html#own
. What is the Reserve Bank of Australia and who owns it?
The Reserve Bank of Australia is Australia's central bank. Its role is set out in the Reserve Bank Act 1959. The Bank conducts the nation's monetary policy and issues its currency. It seeks to foster financial system stability and promotes the safety and efficiency of the payments system. It also offers banking services to government. The Bank is wholly owned by the Australian Government, but is not a government department.
Click to expand...

http://www.rba.gov.au/about-rba/history/index.html
In 1911, legislation established the Commonwealth Bank of Australia. In 1959, this original body corporate was preserved as the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) in legislation, specifically to carry on the central banking functions; at that same time, the commercial and savings banking functions were transferred into a new institution, which carried on the old name of Commonwealth Bank of Australia.
Click to expand...
 
Lovey80 said:
So basically Julie, this rothchild conspiracy theory is all just hyperbol?
Click to expand...

Depends on whether you believe the Queen of England is owned by the banksters, but legally it looks like the Government of Australia owns the RBA
Whether the house of Hanover owns Australia is another question

Edward VII, and, in turn, his son, George V were members of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, a German ducal family, by virtue of their descent from Albert, Prince Consort, husband of Queen Victoria. High anti-German sentiment amongst the people of the British Empire during World War I reached a peak in March 1917, when the Gotha G.IV, a heavy aircraft capable of crossing the English Channel began bombing London directly. The aircraft became a household name, and the name Gotha was part of the name of the royal family, Gotha-Saxe-Coburg. These bombings were coupled with the abdication of King George's first cousin, Nicholas II, the Tsar of Russia on 15 March 1917, which raised the spectre of the eventual abolition of all the monarchies in Europe. The King and his family were finally convinced to abandon all titles held under the German Crown, and to change German titles and house names to anglicised versions. Hence, on 17 July 1917, a royal proclamation issued by George V declared: Now, therefore, We, out of Our Royal Will and Authority, do hereby declare and announce that as from the date of this Our Royal Proclamation Our House and Family shall be styled and known as the House and Family of Windsor, and that all the descendants in the male line of Our said Grandmother Queen Victoria who are subjects of these Realms, other than female descendants who may marry or may have married, shall bear the said Name of Windsor.
Click to expand...

Personally I don't subscribe to the international jewish banker conspiracy I think it is just a version of anti-semitism dragged down through the ages. The collusion in financial circles to unfairly gain as much advantage as possible, can appear like a conspiracy, but only in that base traits like greed are common and banking appears to seduce certain types to it quite successfully.

As far as central banks' function, if you're going to have a banking system it is a good idea to have a central bank in control with a defined mission for the common good. Whether a fractional banking system is a good idea - well just look around on that one.
 
JulieW said:
Lovey80 said:
So basically Julie, this rothchild conspiracy theory is all just hyperbol?
Click to expand...

Depends on whether you believe the Queen of England is owned by the banksters, but legally it looks like the Government of Australia owns the RBA
Whether the house of Hanover owns Australia is another question

Edward VII, and, in turn, his son, George V were members of the House of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, a German ducal family, by virtue of their descent from Albert, Prince Consort, husband of Queen Victoria. High anti-German sentiment amongst the people of the British Empire during World War I reached a peak in March 1917, when the Gotha G.IV, a heavy aircraft capable of crossing the English Channel began bombing London directly. The aircraft became a household name, and the name Gotha was part of the name of the royal family, Gotha-Saxe-Coburg. These bombings were coupled with the abdication of King George's first cousin, Nicholas II, the Tsar of Russia on 15 March 1917, which raised the spectre of the eventual abolition of all the monarchies in Europe. The King and his family were finally convinced to abandon all titles held under the German Crown, and to change German titles and house names to anglicised versions. Hence, on 17 July 1917, a royal proclamation issued by George V declared: Now, therefore, We, out of Our Royal Will and Authority, do hereby declare and announce that as from the date of this Our Royal Proclamation Our House and Family shall be styled and known as the House and Family of Windsor, and that all the descendants in the male line of Our said Grandmother Queen Victoria who are subjects of these Realms, other than female descendants who may marry or may have married, shall bear the said Name of Windsor.
Click to expand...

Personally I don't subscribe to the international jewish banker conspiracy I think it is just a version of anti-semitism dragged down through the ages. The collusion in financial circles to unfairly gain as much advantage as possible, can appear like a conspiracy, but only in that base traits like greed are common and banking appears to seduce certain types to it quite successfully.

As far as central banks' function, if you're going to have a banking system it is a good idea to have a central bank in control with a defined mission for the common good. Whether a fractional banking system is a good idea - well just look around on that one.
Click to expand...

Nice try Julie, Read the 1959 act. In it you will see that the RBA is an ADI - Authorised Deposit taking Institution. Further on you will see that a ****FOREIGNER**** can be appointed to act as attorney (power of?). Therefore the question is, is the RBA a foreign ADI? From this I think it is. It is simply a lower part in the branch of world wide privately controlled central banks where BIS sits at the top of the pyramid. BIS is the central bank's central bank.

Banks are like casinos. They only redistribute wealth with no improvement to the standard of living - stealing wealth not creating new wealth thus causing misery. The few 'good' aspects of banking ought to be carried out by a nationalised banking system for the good of the common wealth.


The Reserve Bank of Australia and the Australian constitution

The Reserve Bank is a foreign ADI. A "foreign ADI" means a body corporate that:
(a) is a foreign corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution; and
(b) is authorised to carry on banking business in a foreign country; and
(c) has been granted an authority under section 9 to carry on banking business in Australia.

Prior to 1959 the Commonwealth issued and printed its own money and had control of the printing of money. However after the 1959 Reserve Bank Act, the Reserve Bank was established as a stand alone independent
foreign ADI, which took over the printing of money and lent the money it printed to the Commonwealth at interest. So instead of the Commonwealth printing its own money, we have a foreign body corporate printing our money and lending it to the Commonwealth which the Commonwealth needs to pay back!

"RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 - SECT 77

Guarantee by Commonwealth

The Commonwealth is responsible for the payment of all moneys due by the Bank" (The commonwealth of Australia is paying money is borrows back to the stand alone bank)
(Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rba1959130/s77.html)

"RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 - SECT 27

Bank to be banker for Commonwealth

The Bank shall, in so far as the Commonwealth requires it to do so, act as banker and financial agent of the Commonwealth" (The reserve bank is the Commonwealths banker and lender and the Commonwealth must pay the money back to the Bank!)
(Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rba1959130/s27.html)

EVIDENCE THE BANK IS A FOREIGN ADI WITH FOREIGN LINKS AND BRANCHES:

The below act shows how foreign coroporations have power of attorny over the Reserve Bank of Australia:

RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 - SECT 76

Attorney of Bank
The Bank may, by instrument under its seal, appoint a person (whether in Australia or in a place beyond Australia) to be its attorney and a person so appointed may, subject to the instrument, do any act or execute any power or function which he or she is authorized by the instrument to do or execute. (Source: http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/rba1959130/s76.html)

Foreign Agents in control of the Reserve Bank of Australia:

RESERVE BANK ACT 1959 - SECT 75

Agents etc.

In the exercise of its powers and the performance of its functions, the Bank may:
(a) establish branches and agencies at such places, whether within or beyond Australia, as the Bank thinks fit;
(b) arrange with a person to act as agent of the Bank in any place, whether within or beyond Australia; and
(c) act as the agent of an ADI carrying on business within or beyond Australia.





The Australian people and most of the people of the world are hypnotized by the manipulative media and the misinformed "Julies" of the world, which is also controlled by the same International corporations that control the Reserve Bank and Global economy. People need to start uncovering facts and truth behind our complex governments, and their oppressive agenda.
 
Is there any proof that the Chinese Central Bank is owned by the Rothschilds? (I highly doubt it)

Slam
 
Julie might be misinformed but at least she asked the question and by doing so, I learnt something today..

Now for the big question?

Who does own The Reserve Bank Of Australia?

Regards Errol 43
 
The Australian people and most of the people of the world are hypnotized by the manipulative media and the misinformed "Julies" of the world, which is also controlled by the same International corporations that control the Reserve Bank and Global economy. People need to start uncovering facts and truth behind our complex governments, and their oppressive agenda.
Click to expand...

I saw the bait in your original question and answered it as I did because of the way you framed that question. It is obvious that conspiracists do not take the words as written instead you choose to take parts of the Act to interpret to mean what you wish to pursue.

I am mildly offended at your 'misinformed' comment, but as hyperbole goes it is relatively mild. Being lumped in with the revisionist proletariat has happened to me before.

Find me the same sort of evidence such as available for the Federal Reserve in USA being privately owned applying to the RBA and I will apologise and accept that the RBA is privately owned. All I see in your quotation is possible interpretations of a possible entity which may have influence, to quote a sample from your post;

a ****FOREIGNER**** can be appointed to act as attorney (power of?). Therefore the question is, is the RBA a foreign ADI? From this I think it is.
Click to expand...

Taking the elements:
Essentially, a financial corporation within the meaning of paragraph 51(xx) of the Constitution is a corporation that has financial activities as the whole, or a substantial or significant part of, its activities (State Superannuation Board v. Trade Practices Commission (1982)
http://www.austrac.gov.au/files/aic_05_financial_corporation.pdf
Click to expand...

and
Section 51 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (Constitution) provides: The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have power to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth with respect to . . . . (xx) foreign corporations, and trading or financial corporations formed within the limits of the Commonwealth
ibid
Click to expand...

Do you think that the powers that could organise an international banking conspiracy over hundreds of years would be so stupid as to leave clues and outright statements in legal documents. Have a look at maritime law and see where we really stand - just check out the strawman debates here on SS to find the convolutions which have supplanted the Magna Carta - nearly all of which has subsequently been repealed anyway . How does the RBA manage to find itself embroiled in a bribery scandal for printing presses if it is foreign owned. Surely something so simple would be easily buried by a cartel of bankers who own the printing presses and the banks of all countries involved!

The real issue is the state of the British Crown's ultimate ownership of Australia and the reduction of personal freedoms under an increasingly totalitarian world zeitgeist.

The government is facing growing pressure to reveal how the Prince of Wales has used his power of consent over draft legislation after it emerged ministers asked him to approve planning and construction laws because they might directly affect the private 700m property empire that provides his annual income.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/oct/31/prince-charles-veto-planning-legislation
Click to expand...
The UK has issued a direct challenge to China and Russia over regulation of the internet, with William Hague insisting that cyberspace must not be "stifled by government control or censorship". In a strongly worded opening address to an international conference hosted in London, the foreign secretary told delegates that the internet "must remain open and not become ghettoised" rebuffing the notion that new international treaties were needed to police online activity.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2011/nov/01/governments-must-not-censor-internet
- see also Labor's hidden draw, the Patriot Act (and Australia's version, and the new push in Europe to control ISP providers - never mind Assange and the criminal campaign against him
Click to expand...

The soulless pathological corporations and their government minions are the issue we should be opening people's minds to. It is their collusion with government that is fuelling the rising fascism in the world, and that is what we should be concerned with, not a possible conspiracy of BIS/IMF and central banks driving us into a feudal state.

If you want a real conspiracy to worry about check out these two sociopaths and the rising fascism in the USA:
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eOCHAv25uTw[/youtube]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top