M Maggie New Member Silver Stacker Aug 18, 2012 #25 Thank you that Guy. When I heard about it I was told it was because they couldn't get the weight correct. I don't think it has been resolved yet.
Thank you that Guy. When I heard about it I was told it was because they couldn't get the weight correct. I don't think it has been resolved yet.
alexbecks Member Aug 18, 2012 #26 At this point I would prefer coin with no holes or with them not piercing through, just in relief. Hope mint will come out with a good final design. Alex.
At this point I would prefer coin with no holes or with them not piercing through, just in relief. Hope mint will come out with a good final design. Alex.
pushingtin Member Silver Stacker Aug 18, 2012 #28 I would have preferred they stuck to the original holes and I would have gladly accepted a slightly underweight 1oz coin. (Provided they marked it as a 30g coin instead of 31.1g) Oh well, lets see what we get
I would have preferred they stuck to the original holes and I would have gladly accepted a slightly underweight 1oz coin. (Provided they marked it as a 30g coin instead of 31.1g) Oh well, lets see what we get
A Argentlust Active Member Silver Stacker Aug 19, 2012 #29 thatguy said: http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/5583_screenshot20120808at136.pnghttp://www.nzmint.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/469x254/Great White Shark2.jpg Click to expand... The original design does have a slightly more organic look.
thatguy said: http://forums.silverstackers.com/uploads/5583_screenshot20120808at136.pnghttp://www.nzmint.com/sites/default/files/imagecache/469x254/Great White Shark2.jpg Click to expand... The original design does have a slightly more organic look.
ShadowPeo Member Silver Stacker Aug 20, 2012 #30 I am with Alex and pushing, either would have been acceptable as a solution