yrh0413 said:
I don't mind Royal Mint puts xxxx with limited presentation of yyyy, but putting xxxx as maximum mintage and the COA says another is totally wrong.
I trust the COA over Royal Mint's website.
It's a strange thing, but i remember the specs page on RM site saying the correct number 1350 when the 2014 range first appeared on their site.
A few days later it was changed to 600.
Curious. Does this mean the mint have abandoned plans to mint beyond 600? (but didn't change the coa's)
Or were they so tired of being contacted about their plans for the next 750, that they just removed the figure of 1350 from the specs page?
But hey, i can honestly say it doesn't bother me. This one is in my top 5 coins. It'll never be sold on.
And that kind of reminds me - some people mentioned the extreme premium cost of this coin.
Yeah, very true. It's the same for all the RM proof coins.
Believe me, i'm often to be heard... er...turtle-ing at the screen when browsing their stuff (especially as i have to pay the VAT).
As a part time stacker myself, i totally understand how we all calculate the silver spot content versus retail price of proofs.
It's natural to do this, and i have often changed my mind about buying this or that issue from many mints based on this.
But....
this britannia is quite simply in a league of its own. It's a work of art. It can't be viewed in terms of silver content or spot values or premium.
It surpasses all those things. For it's beauty of design (thank you Mr Clark!), crafted in high relief in a 65mm precious metal disk- i don't regret a single penny of the purchase price.
You know how we all from time to time have an uninitiated relative or a friend say "so, you collect coins? show me one"
.........This IS that one you will bring out