whinfell said:
OK, go to:
http://courts.dallascounty.org/default.aspx
Click on 'Civil District Case Information'
Enter Case Number: DC1307434 then click 'Search'
On the next page, click on the 'DC-13-07434' link and browse ...
That worked, thanks.
It's a complex story, centered around a collateral dispute where RMC states the bag silver as its property while MM states that they had several deliveries and that it wasn't just RMC's silver.
With the judge deciding in RCM's favor, seizing MM's assets as to make sure that properties/eventual collateral won't be smuggled away.
There is a contradiction though, the site of the topics opening post (which seems not working anymore) claimed that the "International Commodity Banking Association" from the Grays from MM didn't exist.
But the civil district case information does list it on
http://courts.dallascounty.org/View...umentFragmentID=9270212&CheckDocumentGroups=0 as a property : "David and/or Rob Gray, ICBA (International Commidity Banking Association)
And I've read about it last year too,
http://www.freelakotabank.com/a-new-system-of-banking/
I have some dozens of AOCS coins, bought 2011-2012 hence my interest back then.
Some other arguments are abit silly, alike that #Labor and Regulation Department Warns Free Lakota Bank Not Licensed - The South Dakota Department of Labor and Regulation warns potential customers Free Lakota Bank is not licensed, chartered or regulated by the Division of Banking. The bank also does not have FDIC insurance!
The entire setup of the Mulligan Mint and everything of the Grays is against the banking system and the way it operates. It would be contradictional for an organisation that is anti government/state/central banks/etc to operate under the same regulation / FDIC insurance they are against.
And that other argument about the Free Lakota Bank being unrelated to the Republic of Lakotah, the related coins are sold since years.
This is an interesting discussion on this subject, from 2008:
http://forum.freestateproject.org/index.php?action=printpage;topic=16378.0
Below the page is an email answer from the Grays.
The given
http://www.freemarketmetals.com/ redirects to
http://www.fmmex.com/ where a java script is located that links it to a GoDaddy report that the domain is parked free.
The thing is, I know many mints that have country or other state-related names in their company names, with not any relation to that country/state, so why using this as an argument for a bogus company?
Those Andorra silver bars (also from Umicore): unrelated to Andorra. Their currency Diner, used as an argument for a lower tax rate based on legal tender status, actually isn't legal tender and has never been, not before and not after the Euro introduction. That Armenia Noah's Ark coin range, produced by a German company, unrelated to Armenia.
These companies all are a legal business since years, why then blaming Free Lakota Bank for being unrelated to Lakotah? (see #13 Free Lakota Bank? - The Republic of Lakotah is in NO WAY associated with this new "freelakotabank." Caveat Emptor! on
http://www.mulliganmintexposed.com/
Caveat Emptor? Bah.
I'm not taking any position in this. I rather see it as a sad story, because I liked the initiatives and what it is about. I hope the acquisitions turn out to be not true.
From all I've read about it today, it appears like a personal vendetta. Alike illustrated above: several arguments were obviously sought, and a website dedicated to harrass a company in the public, before a lawsuit let alone conviction has been made, it just screams personal vendetta. Even if the Grays are scammers, why 'adding' arguments that are essentially fake? To get an impressive long list?