^^^
you’re killing it @sammysilver !
you’re killing it @sammysilver !
Midnight to 6am - Overnight Spot Watchers Spot...
- Thread starter Turk
- Start date
I’ve sold a shitload of silver today.
^^^
@sammysilver 'you shit loads of silver today?'
@sammysilver 'you shit loads of silver today?'
Always!
^^^
Until US elects TRUMP wins again…cause he’ll make
WORLD PEACE!
Until US elects TRUMP wins again…cause he’ll make
WORLD PEACE!
Last edited:
Hi ho sillllverrrr!!!! Awayyyyyy!
The chart Gods are smiling on us this week.
Oddjob keep your wallet closed!
I should sell to you from my pirate stack then for a double whammy.
Always drops when I start trying to sell...
I think I'm going short forex a tonne and just "break even" on paper till it moves at the "going" rate...
In that scenario my buyers paying more and the forexmarket will make BANK large.
So I think I'll hold for while... see how North Korea and Samsung battery tech takes off and if TPTB can "come together, right now..." and bring a silver laden asteroid into LEO to mine it.
Otherwise less is more imo.
I'd fair a guess tho that the current chart technicals are WAY outside the upper briolinger band, high spread, high volume probably too...
Short sellers like "Survivor" alliance...
Once it breaks and they start covering their OWN asses, "even some going long," they betray their side of the market.
The buyers don't need to be buying when the shorts cover.
Shorts wanna buy back before the spike, not after, so more weak hands for shorts means price up more.
First wave up, the shortes who betry their cause for profit. And go long to squeeze up.
They'd use news to decide the play
If their long now, AND are smart money... then they will flip after they make a profit on their long. Which will be after another higher up...
The ones deciding on technical charts would have either hit a stop loss, or had way more bank and will assess the potential to do a flip themselves.
Stop losses will be out of market.
Te animal flippers may go long as well I there are further shorter in metrics.
That's blow off top tho.
News to avert crisis..
Price falls.
Cause and effect or effect and cause?
Wage war for money or is it just news fora cover story.
Who Is the big money a d when do they make news that affects markets.
Remember 2011 crash was 3 days before news Osama was ended.
Who shorted that spike in advance?
Short sellers like "Survivor" alliance...
Once it breaks and they start covering their OWN asses, "even some going long," they betray their side of the market.
The buyers don't need to be buying when the shorts cover.
Shorts wanna buy back before the spike, not after, so more weak hands for shorts means price up more.
First wave up, the shortes who betry their cause for profit. And go long to squeeze up.
They'd use news to decide the play
If their long now, AND are smart money... then they will flip after they make a profit on their long. Which will be after another higher up...
The ones deciding on technical charts would have either hit a stop loss, or had way more bank and will assess the potential to do a flip themselves.
Stop losses will be out of market.
Te animal flippers may go long as well I there are further shorter in metrics.
That's blow off top tho.
News to avert crisis..
Price falls.
Cause and effect or effect and cause?
Wage war for money or is it just news fora cover story.
Who Is the big money a d when do they make news that affects markets.
Remember 2011 crash was 3 days before news Osama was ended.
Who shorted that spike in advance?
^^^^^^
That’s the long and the short of it!
That’s the long and the short of it!
Its a tasty Keynsian soup sandwich they've made for us.
The joke of the day could be that debt doesn't matter.
The joke of the day could be that debt doesn't matter.
Oh it matters.
When everyone finally works out that printing money is better than austerity and that government debt is not an issue then we may get politicians in power that will make a difference to people's lives.
We're still a long way from realising that though.
Last edited:
Joe Pivarunas, Founder of Nanalyze argues that an individual's investment strategy shouldn't change based on the outcome of the election if their portfolio is sufficiently diversified.
I think the intelligent realize we have to keep printing and austerity isn't in the cards.
There's no one talking cuts, only more promises of freebies and tariffs and more inflation.
They always choose inflation over anything else historically.
You're right, neither candidate is talking budget restraint, but the media stories I read do reference "spiralling debt", "declining revenues from taxation" and the Feds being unable to meet their social security obligations by 2025 or something. It's just proof that the commentators don't have a grip on how governments fund their activities.
Same here in Oz.
Same here in Oz.