I thought phosphate was the main ingredient in fertiliser?
I heard from some farmers in Tas that China have stopped exporting phosphate to us and there is a huge shortage at the moment.
The alternative is expensive to produce and the prediction is extremely high food costs in 2022.
On the back of this I bought AEV shares which is a phosphate mine in Australia.
They have gone very well.

Bar a world war, which I feel is on the way after listening to the war mongers in parliament on the radio, they won't achieve their goals. But rest assured 99 out of 100 participants in the coming war will die.
I don't buy into the depopulation scam. Certainly that may be their goal but what they want and what they'll get are two distinct matters. What would you move your wealth into? Cash? There's more of that than gold if you're worried about depopulation. Only real alternative is land/real estate/business which we should already be actively seeking opportunities in regardless of the headwind.What are people's thoughts on Gold and Silver in relation to the clear and obvious agenda? I mean, less population surely equates to less demand. I was hoping to hold my stack well beyond 2030 but now I think I need to reconsider my choices...
I certainly don't want to hold cash in this environment and feel much safety in PM's... But I don't think PM's present the opportunity they once did now all this Sh!t has begun to unfold. I think this agenda has everything to do with resources. If we don't reduce our consumption within the next 5-10 years, we'll experience shortages on an epic scale. We cannot continue to proceed with out technologically advanced society with the same level of consumerism we're seeing today. The easier solution is to reduce the population, rather than teach or encourage people to not consume or try to keep up with the Jones's.
I don't buy into the depopulation scam. Certainly that may be their goal but what they want and what they'll get are two distinct matters. What would you move your wealth into? Cash? There's more of that than gold if you're worried about depopulation. Only real alternative is land/real estate/business which we should already be actively seeking opportunities in regardless of the headwind.
It's not that I don't believe that they want to achieve those goals, I'm just not confident in their abilities to reduce the population so drastically, bar a major world war like event or nuclear phenomenon.I did mention I'm not interested in holding cash in this climate. I already run two businesses, one of which is booming and the other is in the event hire industry, so it's generating very little profit (but requires no investment of time and energy unless working). I have been interested in rural land/acreage, however, that's just for lifestyle and not investment. I don't have an interest in real-estate investment at this stage. It doesn't take much for an investment to become a liability and I don't intend to borrow from the bank under any circumstance.
I'm not sure why you don't believe in the depopulation agenda? It's as clear as day that population control is on the cards. I can see how you might be sceptical about the intention to reduce it to 500 million but even 3-4 billion seems very plausible by 2030.
Surely there's something more to the jab campaign than trying to look after people's health. I don't think it's just about profits and control for a second. When you look at our below ground resources for copper, leaf, zinc and silver, we are expected to see consistent declines in mine production between 2028-2032. Who knows, reducing the population through sinister means such as these jabs may even be a more humane way to address the situation, rather than the suffering that would come from supply shortages and a subsequent failure to supply the broader population with basic needs and services.
What's your reasoning for the lack of belief? You seem to be quite in-tune with the potential agenda before us.
It's not that I don't believe that they want to achieve those goals, I'm just not confident in their abilities to reduce the population so drastically, bar a major world war like event or nuclear phenomenon.
Have to wait and see what some of the long term effects of gene therapy turn out to be
Sterilisation? Wonder if the parents rushing to get their kids vaxxed are prepared for the conversation, in 5/10/15 years time, as to why they can't have babies[/QU
And now back to the subject, does anyone know what has caused the pop in the gold price and the downward trajectory in the Aussie dollar and shares futures?
That's an odd knee-jerk response to 66 rounds statement. I didn't realise The Corbett Report did a video in Deagel.com until he mentioned it, so I watched it myself.
James underlined the lack of substance and credibility of deagel.com with their population forecasts. He really established the unfounded claims and generalised statements in their response to the multiple enquiries about how they came to such drastic conclusions about population reduction in western countries.
I'm not sure if 66 rounds was referring to deagel being a pile of junk, or James' video about being a pile of junk, but the video didn't try to investigate how such a website could reach such conclusions, he simply analysed the potential credibility of the website and left it at that. It was rather disappointing, however, James made some really good points that for him seemed strong enough to leave the deagel speculation alone. Maybe that's the best outcome, maybe it's not.
I'm not sure why you felt compelled to tell 66 rounds to go take the vaccine and boosters. It wasn't really about that and you didn't even wait for a response to clarify what he was meaning.
Nurses have been coming out revealing the threats they receive of de-registration if they expose the situation in hospitals re: vaccine injuries and false reporting of Covid deaths.
AHPRA threating all GPs with regulatory action and having their license revoked if they say anything negative against the vaccine, or say anything which may undermine the vaccine program. This applies to their private life, too. I'm sure they feel nice and safe with the government's offered legal immunity. No wonder the government encourages our people to go and talk to their GP - Of course they're going be pro-druggos.
Then we have the issue of mandatory vaccinations...The general population are too dumb to understand that:
We have NEVER mandated a vaccine that doesn't inject a weakened or dead version of the virus it's intended to immunise against.
We have NEVER mandated a vaccine that hasn't been fully approved.
We have NEVER mandated a vaccine or drug with no long-term safety studies.
We have NEVER mandated a mRNA, or gene based therapy.
We have NEVER mandated a vaccine to participate in public life, or to access shops or basic services.
We have NEVER successfully created a coronavirus vaccine in the past ( here's a good article from ABC with Dr. Ian Frazer explaining why: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.abc.net.au/article/12146616 )
The illogical comparison between traditional vaccines with a proven long-term safety profile and these new treatments will NEVER make sense just because you claim they do.
Even with the government's flawed data, it shows us that Covid is not a virus we should be fearful of. With a 99.9% survival rate for people under the age of 59 and the average age of death being 80> years old, the majority of vaccine trial participants aren't scared of the virus - they're scared of their governments, loss of freedoms and social displacement.
AUD will buy 0.51 USD again , same as back in 2003
doubt it! we have DumbMo on this case…. ECONOMIC BOOM! MINING BOOM! HOUSING BOOM!
BOOM….BOOM…BOOM!
what is the opposite? it was that level before, just a revisit again... all is probabledoubt it! we have DumbMo on this case…. ECONOMIC BOOM! MINING BOOM! HOUSING BOOM!
BOOM….BOOM…BOOM!