hiho said:
There aint enough gold and silver in the world to match the populations monetary needs, surely?
Well, that all depends on the value.
Hence the pressure on the USA with its monopoly money reserve currency. If Libya or Iraq traded oil in Gold, the price of the PM complex would levitate much higher while the value of the USD would fall away, simple demand. Holders of Gold would ultimately stand indepedently wealthy and powerful, something the USA can not tolerate apparenty.
Which is what I don't get. If the USA has more gold than any other nation on the planet, as they claim, then it would stand to benefit the greatest from the revaluation of gold and re-introduction of a Gold standard.
There are, of course, conspiracy theories that suggest there is no gold in Fort Knox, and attempts to audit the holdings have been dismissed. So that there has not been any independent audit of the Gold reserves of the USA since Eisenhower.
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/article5989271.ece
In which case, it is completely understandable why the USA dares not tolerate any attempts to re-introducing gold into international trade settlements. Maybe there are other reasons, as well, but we would never know.
In fact, if you think about it (and I have a few times) the USA should have crashed its currency before Russia and China started their gold accumulation and USD and US Treasury diversification. They could have completely destroyed their capital reserves and would have been able to re-assert their global superiority, if they had the gold they claim that is.
Hey! Maybe their gold is sleeping with the fishes just like OBL.