perfulator
Member
What accusations Numistacker? I had to reread Bobbies post, and as far as I can tell its a respons to Badons endaviours with the Rooster With Treasure lunar panda fork? As you say, you and Badon are different persons...
Lunar Panda #3 ROOSTER
- Thread starter barsenault
- Start date
barsenault
Well-Known Member
The bottom line is, we are not going back to do a 'classic' goat. That is not even possible, nor should it be. I know it was done with the Nanjing Pandas 2015. They went back a year to continue the series. In my humble opinion, something just doesn't seem right with this policy. Where does the line get drawn? If it is 1 year, why not 100 and just label it that year, or each subsequent year going back a 100 and call it a series. I know this is ludicrous, but so would going back 2 years to do a different goat. The series is just fine the way that it is. our classical version is recognized for what it is, 'the Lunar Panda' - rooster by NGC. It is also referenced subsequent online magazines. The other series has morphed to be called the rooster treasure, check out the NGC label. Simple. One is the Lunar Panda Series and the other is the Panda Treasure series. Done. 
. See how easy that was...and we can feel great about both of them.
. See how easy that was...and we can feel great about both of them.
andrewlee10 said:
Here the donation receipt for merchandise SGD400 to wwf for the coming lucky draw.
Here the donation receipt for SGD100 to wwf.
WWF Singapore office. It is under renovation so some of the prizes will ready in end Jan 2017. The lucky draw will be in Feb or March 2017.
numistacker
Member
perfulator said:
I was referring to the post that mentioned me and badon in the same sentence as if we were one person ))
numistacker
Member
barsenault said:The bottom line is, we are not going back to do a 'classic' goat. That is not even possible, nor should it be. I know it was done with the Nanjing Pandas 2015. They went back a year to continue the series. In my humble opinion, something just doesn't seem right with this policy. Where does the line get drawn? If it is 1 year, why not 100 and just label it that year, or each subsequent year going back a 100 and call it a series. I know this is ludicrous, but so would going back 2 years to do a different goat. The series is just fine the way that it is. our classical version is recognized for what it is, 'the Lunar Panda' - rooster by NGC. It is also referenced subsequent online magazines. The other series has morphed to be called the rooster treasure, check out the NGC label. Simple. One is the Lunar Panda Series and the other is the Panda Treasure series. Done.
Actually It would be quite fun to go back and do a classic goat ... There is a precedent for doing a number of advance years in one year as with perth mint Lunar 1 series proofs. Anyone want to team up with me to fork the series backwards? We would start with a Numi version classic goat for 2015 and then each year we would go back one year with the horse 2014 and the snake 2013. Eventually we would meet Andy and Barsanault in the middle. Anyone for fun and games?
numistacker said:barsenault said:The bottom line is, we are not going back to do a 'classic' goat. That is not even possible, nor should it be. I know it was done with the Nanjing Pandas 2015. They went back a year to continue the series. In my humble opinion, something just doesn't seem right with this policy. Where does the line get drawn? If it is 1 year, why not 100 and just label it that year, or each subsequent year going back a 100 and call it a series. I know this is ludicrous, but so would going back 2 years to do a different goat. The series is just fine the way that it is. our classical version is recognized for what it is, 'the Lunar Panda' - rooster by NGC. It is also referenced subsequent online magazines. The other series has morphed to be called the rooster treasure, check out the NGC label. Simple. One is the Lunar Panda Series and the other is the Panda Treasure series. Done.
Actually It would be quite fun to go back and do a classic goat ... There is a precedent for doing a number of advance years in one year as with perth mint Lunar 1 series proofs. Anyone want to team up with me to fork the series backwards? We would start with a Numi version classic goat for 2015 and then each year we would go back one year with the horse 2014 and the snake 2013. Eventually we would meet Andy and Barsanault in the middle. Anyone for fun and games?
Do you have the relationship and power the get Shenyang mint to agree on it is a question mark !!!
barsenault
Well-Known Member
Of course he doesn't. My good friend numistacker is blowing hot air. Lol.
plus, what more can you add to this classic goat version, not much I'd say. It's perfect for the classic lunar version, and fits in with the animated rooster treasure too.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7f_vxtQLpY[/youtube]
plus, what more can you add to this classic goat version, not much I'd say. It's perfect for the classic lunar version, and fits in with the animated rooster treasure too.
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7f_vxtQLpY[/youtube]
numistacker
Member
andrewlee10 said:numistacker said:barsenault said:The bottom line is, we are not going back to do a 'classic' goat. That is not even possible, nor should it be. I know it was done with the Nanjing Pandas 2015. They went back a year to continue the series. In my humble opinion, something just doesn't seem right with this policy. Where does the line get drawn? If it is 1 year, why not 100 and just label it that year, or each subsequent year going back a 100 and call it a series. I know this is ludicrous, but so would going back 2 years to do a different goat. The series is just fine the way that it is. our classical version is recognized for what it is, 'the Lunar Panda' - rooster by NGC. It is also referenced subsequent online magazines. The other series has morphed to be called the rooster treasure, check out the NGC label. Simple. One is the Lunar Panda Series and the other is the Panda Treasure series. Done.
Actually It would be quite fun to go back and do a classic goat ... There is a precedent for doing a number of advance years in one year as with perth mint Lunar 1 series proofs. Anyone want to team up with me to fork the series backwards? We would start with a Numi version classic goat for 2015 and then each year we would go back one year with the horse 2014 and the snake 2013. Eventually we would meet Andy and Barsanault in the middle. Anyone for fun and games?
Do you have the relationship and power the get Shenyang mint to agree on it is a question mark !!!
I know a guy in the local Chinese that is well connected. He has an uncle who knows a cleaner at the mint. I am hopeful...
barsenault
Well-Known Member
^^^
LOL!! Of course Numistacker, and it is good to make light of things. Life can't be taken too seriously...especially fun stuff like coins.
LOL!! Of course Numistacker, and it is good to make light of things. Life can't be taken too seriously...especially fun stuff like coins.
numistacker said:
Cleaner Aunty is most important staff in office which access to everyone in the company. Not looking down at them. Definitely she will do better job than the stockist sponsor which you well connect with him.kudo to it
There is always baseless information in that forum to attract attention. Keep going out with conspiracy theory and baseless logic which give no real evident which is very irresponsible.
By the way i have received some prizes from wwf which will post photo tonight.
I will post another prizes photo too.
By the way i have received some prizes from wwf which will post photo tonight.
I will post another prizes photo too.
perfulator
Member
andrewlee10 said:
I gave up reading that forum. Too much nonsense and such a relief I can call medals for medals! The only thing I'm missing is the postings about classic medals for sale and sold.
perfulator
Member
It's just my personal view and I don't want to step on any toes, at least most of the toes, so I better not. My point is I feel more at home in this forum. More laid-back, and that suits me.
I reading few forums especially as when I need to explore new areas which I has very low knowledge. However, it took many times to get a good one. So I approach customer who specialize in other areas which i do not. I feel more comfortable in that way.
Many are knowing the forum I point here BUT I will not name it.
I forgot to take the wwf prizes photo. However, This is one of the prize.
Gold .999 rooster with "fortune" wording by Shanghai Mint. Mintage 5000 for one corporate customer which we manager to get 100 pieces.
Many are knowing the forum I point here BUT I will not name it.
I forgot to take the wwf prizes photo. However, This is one of the prize.
Gold .999 rooster with "fortune" wording by Shanghai Mint. Mintage 5000 for one corporate customer which we manager to get 100 pieces.
By the way, 30 pieces of Original Silver proof rooster panda series has graded NGC which 22 pcs PF70 and 8 pieces PF69. 10 pieces with Shenyang special label. 22 pieces available for sell.
We have less than 40 pcs to sell inclusive of ngc graded and omp.
As silver proof first batch was minted at 300 pieces. We yet to decide to mint another batch at this moment. If mint which not more than 100 pieces will mint.
Price will adjust upward for omp very soon. Pf69 still will sell at attractive price which less than 10 pieces for sell for all resellers and ourselves. Rooster is selling faster than monkey panda which we are unable to verify the reason.
As silver proof first batch was minted at 300 pieces. We yet to decide to mint another batch at this moment. If mint which not more than 100 pieces will mint.
Price will adjust upward for omp very soon. Pf69 still will sell at attractive price which less than 10 pieces for sell for all resellers and ourselves. Rooster is selling faster than monkey panda which we are unable to verify the reason.
Shenyang Mint NGC PF70
